dagblog - Comments for "Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump" http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669 Comments for "Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump" en seeing the situation through http://dagblog.com/comment/273905#comment-273905 <a id="comment-273905"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669">Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>seeing the situation through different eyes sometimes helpful to reality check:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Republicans are united against impeachment.<br /> Democrats still have some members who are iffy on it. <a href="https://t.co/QrwkDZ35E6">https://t.co/QrwkDZ35E6</a></p> — Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) <a href="https://twitter.com/FrankLuntz/status/1204493765760520192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 10, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:06:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 273905 at http://dagblog.com 1/2 http://dagblog.com/comment/273871#comment-273871 <a id="comment-273871"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669">Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">1/2<br /> The senators marked with a green dot on this chart were part of the Clinton impeachment also Those who voted 'guilty' felt that lying to Congress and having sex in the WH were impeachable crimes If these same people still in office vote 'not guilty' to admitted &amp; witnessed <a href="https://t.co/tAbqBS9n1h">pic.twitter.com/tAbqBS9n1h</a></p> — dreamwithfaith™ (@dreamwithfaith) <a href="https://twitter.com/dreamwithfaith/status/1204205138144944128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 10, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:51:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 273871 at http://dagblog.com Smart young white guy, good http://dagblog.com/comment/273854#comment-273854 <a id="comment-273854"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669">Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Smart young white guy, with good hair even, has good education but must also have great network and staffers, too; impressing all kinds. Yet, it's not exactly rocket science, there's just too much noise:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>This is about as good a use of the five minutes allotted to members as you can get. <a href="https://twitter.com/ericswalwell?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ericswalwell</a> in his questioning of the D &amp; R counsels creates a succinct: 4:41 summary of the impeachment case against <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a>. <a href="https://t.co/KNq79R2CSA">https://t.co/KNq79R2CSA</a></p> — Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoyAnnReid/status/1204202596333998087?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 10, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:58:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 273854 at http://dagblog.com How to counter disinfo w/o http://dagblog.com/comment/273794#comment-273794 <a id="comment-273794"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669">Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How to counter disinfo w/o amplifying</p> <p><a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-schiff-report-deals-disinformation">https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-schiff-report-deals-disinformation</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Dec 2019 18:01:53 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 273794 at http://dagblog.com Rick Perry led Trump crony http://dagblog.com/comment/273791#comment-273791 <a id="comment-273791"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669">Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Rick Perry led Trump crony energy coup attempt over Ukrainian state gas - totally illegal. <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ukraine-impeachment-naftogaz-rudy-giuliani-donors-inquiry-gop-a9145651.html">https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ukra...</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Dec 2019 11:32:33 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 273791 at http://dagblog.com More laws broken: HUD http://dagblog.com/comment/273789#comment-273789 <a id="comment-273789"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-are-senate-republicans-who-could-vote-convict-trump-29669">Here are the Senate Republicans who could vote to convict Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More laws broken: HUD illegally withholds Congressionally allocated funds.</p> <p>Impeach the motherfucker.</p> <p><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/house-democrats-slam-trump-admin-illegally-withholding-puerto-rico-hurricane-n1096421">https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/house-democrats-slam-trump-admin-ill...</a></p> <p>ETA:: Democrats really have to stop being weakass dumbfucks.</p> <blockquote> <p>"I don’t want it to come to this," Price told NBC.</p> </blockquote> <p>WTF? It's come to this, you moron - over and over and over again. It's been over 3 months past the deadline just on this case alone. Sue him, cut his administration appropriates, and EVERY OTHER FUCKING THING IN THE ARSENAL, AT THE SAME TIME. Trump sure as fuck won't listen to "pretty please, could you stop procrastinting?" absolute idiots. Didn't they read what happened in Ukraine? Trump withheld mandated money from a war defense effort against Russia, which people care about more than Puerto Rico so he had to give in.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Dec 2019 11:10:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 273789 at http://dagblog.com