dagblog - Comments for "The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies" http://dagblog.com/link/role-cognitive-rigidity-political-ideologies-29724 Comments for "The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies" en Facebook ad pricing sorta http://dagblog.com/comment/274061#comment-274061 <a id="comment-274061"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/role-cognitive-rigidity-political-ideologies-29724">The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Facebook ad pricing sorta related, hah!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Fascinating and disturbing. “When the researchers sought to force Facebook to show posts to users not already aligned with the ideology of the advertising, the cost of the advertising rose.... a campaign pays more when it tries to speak to the other side” <a href="https://t.co/WxW0uxyn5J">https://t.co/WxW0uxyn5J</a></p> — Laura Rosenberger (@rosenbergerlm) <a href="https://twitter.com/rosenbergerlm/status/1204490190531760129?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 10, 2019</a></blockquote> </div> <p>edit to add: And I note now that Professor Grossman tweeted that right after he tweeted the Cognitive Rigidity paper:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Facebook’s algorithm tends to incentivize preaching to the already converted in political advertising<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SocSciResearch?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SocSciResearch</a><br /><a href="https://t.co/yZwNXDGwcz">https://t.co/yZwNXDGwcz</a></p> — Matt Grossmann (@MattGrossmann) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattGrossmann/status/1205641700519161857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 14, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Dec 2019 04:22:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 274061 at http://dagblog.com Excerpt: http://dagblog.com/comment/274051#comment-274051 <a id="comment-274051"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/role-cognitive-rigidity-political-ideologies-29724">The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Excerpt:</p> <blockquote> <p>[...Past research has often relied on scales of political conservatism as a proxy for extremism (by considering those who self-report as ‘strongly liberal’ and ‘strongly conservative’ as ‘extreme’; e.g. [<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154619301147#bib0105" name="bbib0105" id="bbib0105">21</a>,<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154619301147#bib0110" name="bbib0110" id="bbib0110">22</a>]). This is potentially misleading because it can confound partisan direction with extremity, dogmatism, or allegiance to established doctrines; for instance, a self-professed ‘strongly liberal’ participant may be ‘extreme’ or could simply possess liberal views without necessarily being partisan or radical.</p> <p>In a recent study of over 700 US citizens, Zmigrod <em>et al.</em> [<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154619301147#bib0085" name="bbib0085" id="bbib0085">17••</a>] measured the strength of partisan identities using a continuous pictorial measure which allowed participants to indicate the level of identity fusion between their personal identities and the two prevailing political parties (Democratic and Republican Parties). Using three independent behavioural measures of cognitive rigidity from the neuropsychological literature, the analyses revealed a clear inverted-U shaped relationship between partisan intensity and flexibility: participants on the extreme left and extreme right displayed reduced cognitive flexibility on these three tests relative to moderates and those with only weak personal attachments to the political parties (see <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154619301147#fig0005" name="bfig0005" id="bfig0005">Figure 1</a>). Consequently, when partisan strength is measured directly, rather than through measures that were designed to quantify political conservatism, it is possible to observe the elusive ‘rigidity-of-the-left’ [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Dec 2019 02:53:34 +0000 artappraiser comment 274051 at http://dagblog.com