dagblog - Comments for "Historical switch: Blacks near support for secession"

I bet you think that this is

rmrd0000 — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:23:37 +0000

I bet you think that this is coherent.

Now tell us about the dishwashers.

More an acceptance of an

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:14:04 +0000

More an acceptance of an additional form of redress for grievances just in theory that was previously rejected outright due to it being used against them, not that Marcus Harvey's Back To Africa project was that different from secession. But yes, what state or municipality would vote for secession, would that be a viable country by itself or in tandem with others, would it be based on ethnic or religious identity (or gender - Amazons, here's your chance). I can see Texas or California seceding before some other group tries it, though Wyoming might go easy due to its remoteness and low population. North Dakota is oddly too valuable -might fight to see them stay (or occupy a piece of Saskatchewan or Manitoba for them - non-violently, of course, just good ol Trump-styoe intimida... er, persuasion.

U shure do talk purty

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:02:52 +0000

In reply to I'm sure the snowflake

U shure do talk purty

I'm sure the snowflake

Anonymous — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:49:49 +0000

In reply to The hypothetical secession

I'm sure the snowflake socialists don't understand the questions in this survey any better than the responses. The first question asks if people would support succession if it offered the Libertarian ideal of freedom from Big Government intrusion in their life and more control of their individual destiny/liberty. The growing support of Black voters for this Libertarian ideal is great news for America but bad news for the commie dem Plantation Masters.

The response to the second question showed that only 1/3 of voters still support Big Government's use of force to impose the Administrative States' control over peoples lives. This is still too many people that support Big Brother tyranny but at least the majority rejects this tyranny 2 to 1.

If the Blue State Marxist Confederacy became a reality the rubes who supported it would immediately be stripped of their 1st, 2nd and 4th Amendment Rights and be forced to listen to their new Masters tell them to shut up, sit in the dark and eat bugs.

Things have changed since

rmrd0000 — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:26:34 +0000

In reply to Why should they have to? It's

Things have changed since Texas v White?

I have so many questions.

artappraiser — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:17:47 +0000

In reply to Why should they have to? It's

I have so many questions. Like: Are they all going to move to the same geographical area? (And then build a wall?) Or like take over Hawaii or Alaska and kick all the U.S. supporters out? Or have a West Bank sorta deal? Like will U.S. people be able to eat in their restaurants without a passport? Will they have quicker or slower Amazon Prime? Or is this going to be a "virtual" state? How would that work? Seems to me it would be a little more complicated than this Brexit thing, those people are already separated on islands.

Why should they have to? It's

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:35:55 +0000

In reply to The hypothetical secession

Why should they have to? It's 2020 - secession should be a non-violent event.

The hypothetical secession

rmrd0000 — Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:31:40 +0000

In reply to Historical switch: Blacks near support for secession

The hypothetical secession does not involve enslaving other people. An important question is how many would be willing to arm themselves, plan, and fight for secession.