dagblog - Comments for "Trump&#039;s gaining" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trumps-gaining-29785 Comments for "Trump's gaining" en Interesting that Noah Smith http://dagblog.com/comment/274625#comment-274625 <a id="comment-274625"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274247#comment-274247">Tweeted yesterday morning:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting that Noah Smith of Bloomberg just tweeted that he became more "long-term optimistic" on all three of these areas this last year:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I became much more long-term optimistic about American culture, politics, and society. <a href="https://t.co/27p1lFmDg1">https://t.co/27p1lFmDg1</a></p> — Noah Smith (@Noahpinion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1211499620230033413?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 30 Dec 2019 04:13:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 274625 at http://dagblog.com The  September to December http://dagblog.com/comment/274618#comment-274618 <a id="comment-274618"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274592#comment-274592">yeah and I see in it the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The  September to December comparison interested me because it brackets the House Impeachment and </p> <p>Decision.  Given the experience of the Clinton Impeachment I'm relieved that  September to December  was as shown.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:56:51 +0000 Flavius comment 274618 at http://dagblog.com Incredibly consistent support http://dagblog.com/comment/274598#comment-274598 <a id="comment-274598"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274592#comment-274592">yeah and I see in it the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Incredibly consistent support (and disapproval). Statistically unlikely, except as ushers in some new phenomenon.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:48:21 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 274598 at http://dagblog.com yeah and I see in it the http://dagblog.com/comment/274592#comment-274592 <a id="comment-274592"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274590#comment-274590">Compared to what ?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>yeah and I see in it the little spike the other day which probably influenced what you were reading. Now looks like just an anomaly of one or two polls.Only real change appears to be a dip in approval from May through Dec. 2017.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Dec 2019 05:26:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 274592 at http://dagblog.com Compared to what ? http://dagblog.com/comment/274590#comment-274590 <a id="comment-274590"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trumps-gaining-29785">Trump&#039;s gaining</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Compared to what ?</p> <p>538's top chart   "how unpopular is  Donald Trump? " is interactive</p> <p>On Sept 1 Trump scored 41.3%. Today he's  42.6</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Dec 2019 05:04:33 +0000 Flavius comment 274590 at http://dagblog.com just now there was this http://dagblog.com/comment/274468#comment-274468 <a id="comment-274468"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274463#comment-274463">A factor rarely broached is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>just now there was this thought-provoking comment in my twitter feed along the same lines:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trump offered Republicans a way to vote against their establishment, and then the entire American establishment.<br /><br /> Bernie offers Democrats a way to do the same.<br /><br /> Yang offers everyone a way to vote against the entire American establishment, Trump, and Bernie.</p> — Wesley Yang (@wesyang) <a href="https://twitter.com/wesyang/status/1210410684158291968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 27, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Dec 2019 04:03:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 274468 at http://dagblog.com So, going for the center vote http://dagblog.com/comment/274467#comment-274467 <a id="comment-274467"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274463#comment-274463">A factor rarely broached is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>So, going for the center vote is a better move?</em></p> <p>I found it interesting in that the article suggests Iowa caucus voters are all set to decide that for the rest of us! So why you worrying your pretty head about it? They got this!<img alt="cheeky" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/tongue_smile.png" title="cheeky" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Dec 2019 03:52:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 274467 at http://dagblog.com A factor rarely broached is http://dagblog.com/comment/274463#comment-274463 <a id="comment-274463"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274448#comment-274448">ICYMI:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A factor rarely broached is if Bernie was the Democratic nominee, would that  "prove" he was just a "sellout" to the "corporate controlled corrupt" DNC ?</p> <p>Ergo....would the hard core lefty purity angels show up in the general?</p> <p>So, going for the center vote is a better move?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Dec 2019 02:57:00 +0000 NCD comment 274463 at http://dagblog.com “Fifty-five percent of those http://dagblog.com/comment/274462#comment-274462 <a id="comment-274462"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trumps-gaining-29785">Trump&#039;s gaining</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“Fifty-five percent of those asked said they were in favor of the US president’s conviction by the Senate, a figure which has shot up from 48 percent the week before.” <a href="https://t.co/vs0DP5Xxa9">https://t.co/vs0DP5Xxa9</a></p> — Heath Mayo (@HeathMayo) <a href="https://twitter.com/HeathMayo/status/1210261602890588161?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Dec 2019 00:34:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 274462 at http://dagblog.com ICYMI: http://dagblog.com/comment/274448#comment-274448 <a id="comment-274448"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trumps-gaining-29785">Trump&#039;s gaining</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ICYMI: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/25/us/politics/joe-biden-2020-republicans.html?action=click&amp;module=Top%20Stories&amp;pgtype=Homepage">The ‘But I Would Vote for Joe Biden’ Republicans</a></p> <p><em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/25/us/politics/joe-biden-2020-republicans.html?action=click&amp;module=Top%20Stories&amp;pgtype=Homepage">For some Democrats, a key part of the former vice president’s pitch is that their moderate friends and relatives like him, too.</a></em></p> <p>By Katie Glueck, 7h ago @ NYTimes.com</p> <blockquote> <p>CRESTON, Iowa — The voters at campaign events for Joseph R. Biden Jr. here in Iowa and across the country aren’t just shopping for a candidate for themselves.</p> <p>As they jostle to take pictures with the former vice president and listen to him preach about national unity, they are often thinking about someone else — a dad, a neighbor or a colleague. They consider the political leanings of people close to them who are uncomfortable with the most liberal presidential contenders, but who hate the chaos of the Trump era and are receptive to the kind of centrist, seasoned candidacy Mr. Biden offers.</p> <p>Some Democrats have been warning the party not to obsess over these potential swing voters, arguing that electability calculations about mythical undecided moderates are futile at this moment of extreme political polarization.</p> <p>But for many Biden supporters, those voters are their Republican-leaning relatives and friends. And their perspectives are an increasingly prominent consideration as the Iowa caucuses near [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Dec 2019 04:34:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 274448 at http://dagblog.com