dagblog - Comments for "The Iranian assassination" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iranian-assassination-29909 Comments for "The Iranian assassination" en Someone may steal it for him. http://dagblog.com/comment/274908#comment-274908 <a id="comment-274908"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274907#comment-274907">As a by product of his self</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Someone may steal it for him.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Jan 2020 18:10:04 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 274908 at http://dagblog.com As a by product of his self http://dagblog.com/comment/274907#comment-274907 <a id="comment-274907"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274890#comment-274890">Interesting analysis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As a by product of his self defense Trump is  undermining the constitutional separation of powers .And using    not only those of the executive to do that but also his-admit it-  well honed rabble rousing skills.</p> <p>The Entertainment Power strikes back!</p> <p>Back in the day it was well known that if  you'd want to strike at the King, be sure you're successful.</p> <p>Ir's the bottom of the ninth, score tied , nobody out and Donnie at second. Fortunately he's too fat to steal third!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Jan 2020 13:57:38 +0000 Flavius comment 274907 at http://dagblog.com Biden is focusing on the http://dagblog.com/comment/274892#comment-274892 <a id="comment-274892"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274881#comment-274881">well, one could segue to &quot;is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Biden is focusing on the tweet threatening war crimes, but so far is only targeting the "irrational" behavior:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>The more the walls close in on this guy, the more irrational he becomes. <a href="https://t.co/Nba7Color1">https://t.co/Nba7Color1</a></p> — Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1213663155743842304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 5, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Jan 2020 03:23:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 274892 at http://dagblog.com Interesting analysis http://dagblog.com/comment/274890#comment-274890 <a id="comment-274890"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iranian-assassination-29909">The Iranian assassination</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting analysis recommended by Laura Rozen, by Reza Marashi of the National Iranian American Council, l<a href="https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1213282205868290049https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1213282205868290049">ong twitter thread here giving many examples to back up his opinion that</a></p> <p> <em>the only discernible common thread in Trump’s decision-making is proving that he is different than Obama </em></p> <p>and</p> <p><em>when Trump’s desire to be the anti-Obama is mixed with the foundational Islamophobia that he has repeatedly displayed at home and abroad, a clear picture of where he's coming from on Iran emerges.</em></p> <p>except he then goes on to explain how </p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>That being said, Trump isn't the only one in his administration with a personal grudge. The majority of his top advisors on Middle East policy are white men with military backgrounds who view the Iranian govt through the prism of “payback” after losing in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.</p> — Reza Marashi (@rezamarashi) <a href="https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1213282214781149184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>From the outset of Trump's presidency, career U.S. govt officials have told me: “These guys are looking to settle scores, American interests be damned.”</p> — Reza Marashi (@rezamarashi) <a href="https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1213282215745818625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>that is continued on his feed....</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Jan 2020 02:57:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 274890 at http://dagblog.com Here's a nasty Catch 22 if http://dagblog.com/comment/274888#comment-274888 <a id="comment-274888"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iranian-assassination-29909">The Iranian assassination</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's a nasty Catch 22 if one were to insert a President Pence into this current situation to replace a President Trump who is isolationist one day and making crazy choices and threatening war crimes the next. Looking a little like a President Pence would be like having a Dick Cheney world deja vus allover again, no guessing games about him but still plenty of disinfo. He did a long feed of tweets today elaborating many examples of why Soleimani's Quds was an enemy of America, including this nonsense about 9/11:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.</p> — Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) <a href="https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/1213189757708189699?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">From <a href="https://twitter.com/lawrence_wright?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@lawrence_wright</a>, one of the leading authorities on 9/11: <a href="https://t.co/9T4Q7TGYh5">https://t.co/9T4Q7TGYh5</a></p> — Rukmini Callimachi (@rcallimachi) <a href="https://twitter.com/rcallimachi/status/1213549530056134658?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>And maybe worse than Cheney, maybe more anti-Muslim Christian Dominionist than he lets off, appearing secular but making Christian Dominionist choices in foreign policy?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Jan 2020 02:27:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 274888 at http://dagblog.com this is a good question but I http://dagblog.com/comment/274882#comment-274882 <a id="comment-274882"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274881#comment-274881">well, one could segue to &quot;is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>this is a good question but I would hope they answer no because I don't like the idea of Twitter being the one deciding who's crazy and incapable of executing their job and I do like him revealing his incompetence in public:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Dear Twitter, does threatening a war crime violate the site's ToS? Asking for the whole world.</p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1213607242227965953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:51:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 274882 at http://dagblog.com well, one could segue to "is http://dagblog.com/comment/274881#comment-274881 <a id="comment-274881"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274879#comment-274879">Hmmm.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>well, one could segue to "is it an impeachable offense to threaten war crimes?"</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">WAR CRIME<br /><br /> "Making the clearly-recognized historic monuments, works of art or places of worship which constitute the cultural or spiritual heritage of peoples ... the object of attack"<br /><br /> Geneva Convention Protocol I<br /> (also: U.S. Department of Defense, Law of War Manual, 5.18) <a href="https://t.co/yqKLA6JHbY">pic.twitter.com/yqKLA6JHbY</a></p> — Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) <a href="https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1213602012308418560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:33:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 274881 at http://dagblog.com Hmmm. http://dagblog.com/comment/274879#comment-274879 <a id="comment-274879"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274877#comment-274877">it&#039;s like Drumpf is not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hmmm.<br /> He is watching a show he made be produced. That's it.</p> <p>No reason to ask why.</p> <p>Unless you were interested in the causes of things.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:14:13 +0000 moat comment 274879 at http://dagblog.com reminds me of how he started http://dagblog.com/comment/274878#comment-274878 <a id="comment-274878"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274877#comment-274877">it&#039;s like Drumpf is not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>reminds me of how he started out ridiculing Kim as rocketman, then he gradually fell in manlove, then looks like last month it was<a href="https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/trump-revives-rocket-man-nickname-when-speaking-about-kim-jong-un-74403397547"> back to rocketman</a>-was that because Kim called him a dotard? He's nobody's girly man? Can be just as  tough as Mullah Omar blowing up big buddhas, so there!</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:12:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 274878 at http://dagblog.com Something like that. http://dagblog.com/comment/274876#comment-274876 <a id="comment-274876"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/274875#comment-274875">&quot;jihad, bitch!&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Something like that.</p> <p>But the present action is more along the lines of deepening Shia and Sunni divisions.</p> <p>So the wars underway in Syria and Saudi Arabia will get a new flavor.</p> <p>And Jordan too. They have been hoping for a development that won't be happening now.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:06:19 +0000 moat comment 274876 at http://dagblog.com