dagblog - Comments for "Trump wins again" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961 Comments for "Trump wins again" en Trump NOT WINNING on Iran: http://dagblog.com/comment/275153#comment-275153 <a id="comment-275153"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961">Trump wins again</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trump NOT WINNING on Iran:<br /><br /> Approve 43/56<br /> More/Less Safe 22/52<br /> Trump's behavior w/Iran reckless 52/34<br /> Divert from Impeachment 47/39<br /> Congress should limit Trump's war powers 55/33<a href="https://t.co/36emvm6JYL">https://t.co/36emvm6JYL</a><br /><br /> From USA Today &amp; ABC News Ipsos polls this week.</p> — Simon Rosenberg (@SimonWDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/SimonWDC/status/1216513822762131457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:16:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 275153 at http://dagblog.com I think "spot on": http://dagblog.com/comment/275141#comment-275141 <a id="comment-275141"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961">Trump wins again</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think "spot on":</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Day 1086: The people behind our Intelligence are insufficiently servile “human scum”, except when my Raytheon-lobbyist-turned-acting-Defense-Secretary gives it the OK and I’ve got a re-election to sleaze my way into. Now STFU with your unpatriotic question-asking. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/warprofiteers?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#warprofiteers</a> <a href="https://t.co/COSe1eN93u">pic.twitter.com/COSe1eN93u</a></p> — TheDailyDon (@JRDuquette) <a href="https://twitter.com/JRDuquette/status/1216422393658380295?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:02:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 275141 at http://dagblog.com ya I saw that. And thought: http://dagblog.com/comment/275135#comment-275135 <a id="comment-275135"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275131#comment-275131">And if these mercenaries</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ya I saw that. And thought: back b.t. (before Trump) I woulda thought:ridiculous conspiracizing. But now, it would just be another thing on the other side of the looking glass we are all stuck in.</p> <p>It just never ends. Check it out:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trump’s policy proposal for what NATO can do in the Middle East. Reflects months of interagency work apparently. <a href="https://t.co/KJfDoyXkZV">https://t.co/KJfDoyXkZV</a></p> — Tom Wright (@thomaswright08) <a href="https://twitter.com/thomaswright08/status/1216311325997006848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:09:34 +0000 artappraiser comment 275135 at http://dagblog.com And if these mercenaries http://dagblog.com/comment/275131#comment-275131 <a id="comment-275131"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275128#comment-275128">The winningest president evah</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And if these mercenaries maliciiusly kill someone like a contractor out in the field, do they get to target one of our leaders?</p> <p>And why haven't we struck Saudi Arabia?</p> <p><a href="https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/01/11/politics/saudi-servicemen-expelled-december-air-force-base-shooting/index.html">https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/01/11/politics/saudi-servicemen-expelled-de...</a></p> <p>Trying to understand the new rules.</p> <p>Unconfirmed (read thread):</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Everyone wonders where the $1 billion Trump got from MBS (he won't say when) went. In late 2017, a Saudi whistleblower later spied on by MBS via Twitter said he had the answer. (<a href="https://twitter.com/MiddleEastEye?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MiddleEastEye</a> was founded by an <a href="https://twitter.com/guardian?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@guardian</a> editor.)<br /><br /> The story is unconfirmed. <a href="https://t.co/QPJ0ohui9l">https://t.co/QPJ0ohui9l</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1216168772404490245?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Jan 2020 03:05:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275131 at http://dagblog.com The winningest president evah http://dagblog.com/comment/275128#comment-275128 <a id="comment-275128"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961">Trump wins again</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The winningest president evah sells The Troops for big bucks. Artful dealing. #MAGA.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">How is it possible that the President can announce we're using U.S. troops as mercenaries, and yet absolutely no further information is available on the details of this arrangement? <a href="https://t.co/0tnHp8PyOc">https://t.co/0tnHp8PyOc</a></p> — Susan Simpson (@TheViewFromLL2) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheViewFromLL2/status/1216136116631371778?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:44:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 275128 at http://dagblog.com Julian Borger thinks (and he http://dagblog.com/comment/275084#comment-275084 <a id="comment-275084"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961">Trump wins again</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Julian Borger thinks (and he has a good record on things about power in foreign policy) that:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Pompeo has sealed his spot as 'Trump's whisperer' with his mission to beat Iran<a href="https://t.co/lDd5no3wBW">https://t.co/lDd5no3wBW</a></p> — Julian Borger (@julianborger) <a href="https://twitter.com/julianborger/status/1215786704059150337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Jan 2020 00:03:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 275084 at http://dagblog.com Interesting that there's http://dagblog.com/comment/275077#comment-275077 <a id="comment-275077"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961">Trump wins again</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting that there's always a Trump tweet that makes Trump a loser by his own standards:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Eight years ago right now. <a href="https://t.co/JQI4KAbF9r">https://t.co/JQI4KAbF9r</a></p> — Philip Bump (@pbump) <a href="https://twitter.com/pbump/status/1215741596420976641?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:06:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 275077 at http://dagblog.com FWIW, Thurs. night he was http://dagblog.com/comment/275070#comment-275070 <a id="comment-275070"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275068#comment-275068">Hair splitting I agree. My</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FWIW, Thurs. night he was desperately appropriating the "deplorables" thing:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Donald Trump refers to 42 million American voters as “vicious, horrible people.” <a href="https://t.co/ZNfzcRZgTe">pic.twitter.com/ZNfzcRZgTe</a></p> — Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) <a href="https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1215463286298247168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Heckuva way to get more votes!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2020 05:50:37 +0000 artappraiser comment 275070 at http://dagblog.com Hair splitting I agree. My http://dagblog.com/comment/275068#comment-275068 <a id="comment-275068"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275067#comment-275067">Argument that he&#039;s a big</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hair splitting I agree. My theory is that he'd be further behind  if he hadn't trotted out the ever-popular  anti Obama attack to provide his faithful with a blind alley to chase down.</p> <p>Not just amusing myself with a  contrary view,  I actually think there's<u> some</u> actual validity. But only some!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Jan 2020 03:33:07 +0000 Flavius comment 275068 at http://dagblog.com Argument that he's a big http://dagblog.com/comment/275067#comment-275067 <a id="comment-275067"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/trump-wins-again-29961">Trump wins again</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Argument that he's a big loser:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trolled by Iran’s leaders and captured by the hawks around him, the president clumsily took the U.S. to the brink of the Middle East war he’d pledged to avoid. For some supporters, it could be the last straw <a href="https://t.co/L20hjXOICj">https://t.co/L20hjXOICj</a></p> — VANITY FAIR (@VanityFair) <a href="https://twitter.com/VanityFair/status/1215378288543260672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jan 2020 20:59:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 275067 at http://dagblog.com