dagblog - Comments for "Russian Military Hacked Burisma as Impeachment Inquiry in House Reached Public Phase" http://dagblog.com/link/russian-military-hacked-burisma-impeachment-inquiry-house-reached-public-phase-30019 Comments for "Russian Military Hacked Burisma as Impeachment Inquiry in House Reached Public Phase" en This report tying GRU to a http://dagblog.com/comment/275260#comment-275260 <a id="comment-275260"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/russian-military-hacked-burisma-impeachment-inquiry-house-reached-public-phase-30019">Russian Military Hacked Burisma as Impeachment Inquiry in House Reached Public Phase</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This report tying GRU to a Burisma phishing attack is both literally and figuratively very thin. No details on what data they have other than a public phishing page. The absolute rhetorical certainty instead of standard language on confidence level are red flags. <a href="https://t.co/yeDCZdCRyG">pic.twitter.com/yeDCZdCRyG</a></p> — Alex Stamos (@alexstamos) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1217216221424185344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:32:05 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275260 at http://dagblog.com Reaganite - that's almost a http://dagblog.com/comment/275218#comment-275218 <a id="comment-275218"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275214#comment-275214">Naughty I know. She&#039;s just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Reaganite - that's almost a compliment in these cray-cray topsy-turvy times. Bring me my rocker, let's watch "Those Were the Days". Btw, what *is* Glenn Miller doing now?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:43:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275218 at http://dagblog.com Naughty I know. She's just http://dagblog.com/comment/275214#comment-275214 <a id="comment-275214"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275212#comment-275212">How unwoke 2020, judging</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Naughty I know. She's just always impressed me as very Reaganite, it's my naughty way of getting that across. It is clear she despises what Trump is doing to the country, no matter how hard she tries to hide it. What I was trying to get across here, though, is that I think right of center people still trust her reporting whereas they might not think much of her MSNBC colleagues. (And yeah, since you went there--she is an old school feminist, Ruth Bader Ginsburg style.)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:38:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 275214 at http://dagblog.com How unwoke 2020, judging http://dagblog.com/comment/275212#comment-275212 <a id="comment-275212"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275210#comment-275210">And methinks it&#039;s a good sign</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How unwoke 2020, judging women by their hubbies. You think Elaine Chao is somehow tainted? Or Melania or Ivanka? Mrs.Mnuchin seems like a fine upstanding lady who likes nature, such as total eclipses. And Murdoch's previous gal Wendi. Or Mrs. Sheldon. Really, have you no shame?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:28:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275212 at http://dagblog.com And methinks it's a good sign http://dagblog.com/comment/275210#comment-275210 <a id="comment-275210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275209#comment-275209">.@SenSchumer and </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And methinks it's a good sign that Mrs. Greenspan is tweeting about it, cause Rachel doesn't get to everyone. Mrs. Greenspan never impressed me as much of a liberal, but she's old school, she doesn't think U.S. citizens should be trusting Russia.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:14:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 275210 at http://dagblog.com .@SenSchumer and http://dagblog.com/comment/275209#comment-275209 <a id="comment-275209"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/russian-military-hacked-burisma-impeachment-inquiry-house-reached-public-phase-30019">Russian Military Hacked Burisma as Impeachment Inquiry in House Reached Public Phase</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">.<a href="https://twitter.com/SenSchumer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenSchumer</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RepAdamSchiff</a> both tell <a href="https://twitter.com/maddow?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Maddow</a> they learned about Russian military hacked Burisma the Ukrainian emery company that put Hunter Biden on its board from <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nytimes</a> not from US intel</p> — Andrea Mitchell (@mitchellreports) <a href="https://twitter.com/mitchellreports/status/1216914701411635205?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:07:20 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275209 at http://dagblog.com