dagblog - Comments for "The Old Grey Lady and Dementia" http://dagblog.com/link/old-grey-lady-and-dementia-30099 Comments for "The Old Grey Lady and Dementia" en Mara Gay was part of the NYT http://dagblog.com/comment/275618#comment-275618 <a id="comment-275618"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275616#comment-275616">I don&#039;t &quot;object&quot; to op-ed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Mara Gay was part of the NYT editorial boards' endorsement of Warren and Klobuchar </p> <p>Here is her explanation on MSNBC's " Morning Joe"</p> <blockquote> <p>Mara Gay, a member of the New York Times editorial board, on Monday explained the newspaper's decision to endorse two candidates in the Democrat primary, for the first time ever.</p> <p>"Both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration," <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/19/opinion/amy-klobuchar-elizabeth-warren-nytimes-endorsement.html?action=click&amp;module=Opinion&amp;pgtype=Homepage">the editorial said</a>. "That’s why we’re endorsing the most effective advocates for each approach. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar."</p> <p>Mara Gay told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday, "The party is extremely divided, and this is really our way of narrowing that field and also just pointing out to voters that there is more than one pathway forward here.</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://www.cnsnews.com/article/national/susan-jones/ny-times-editorial-board-member-explains-double-endorsement">https://www.cnsnews.com/article/national/susan-jones/ny-times-editorial-board-member-explains-double-endorsement</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 03:51:38 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 275618 at http://dagblog.com Well I'm pretty anti http://dagblog.com/comment/275617#comment-275617 <a id="comment-275617"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275611#comment-275611">That post is enough, but I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well I'm pretty anti-establishment too, and I support primary challenges of conservative politicians. One of the politicians referenced in the article added amendments in an important abortion bill against same sex marriage and equal pay for women. I'd have difficulty voting for someone that far out of sync with my principles.</p> <p>Does that mean I think the party is scum? That I want all boomers killed? That Hillary etc. are Nazis? That's what I don't see in Mara's posts.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 03:20:15 +0000 ocean-kat comment 275617 at http://dagblog.com I don't "object" to op-ed http://dagblog.com/comment/275616#comment-275616 <a id="comment-275616"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275614#comment-275614">Did you object to her pieces</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't "object" to op-ed pieces. I read them. And after a time, I might make a judgment about the writer and what angles they push and then whether they do that well enough to continue reading them or go find someone who represents the same view but writes better and is more sophisticated about challenging readers' thoughts.</p> <p>Not a big fan of the agitprop type of op-ed, as you might know by now.  No matter what political angle is being pushed. Don't get a lot out of "amen" and "say it again, brother" technique, left right or center.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:53:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 275616 at http://dagblog.com Did you object to her pieces http://dagblog.com/comment/275614#comment-275614 <a id="comment-275614"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275611#comment-275611">That post is enough, but I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Did you object to her pieces on Michael Bloomberg or bail reform?</p> <p>Bloomberg </p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/17/opinion/Michael-bloomberg-stop-and-frisk.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/17/opinion/Michael-bloomberg-stop-and-frisk.html</a></p> <p>Bail</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/opinion/new-york-bail-reform.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/opinion/new-york-bail-reform.html</a></p> <p>Complete list of NYT op-eds </p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/by/mara-gay">https://www.nytimes.com/by/mara-gay</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:46:04 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 275614 at http://dagblog.com That post is enough, but I http://dagblog.com/comment/275611#comment-275611 <a id="comment-275611"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275608#comment-275608">That&#039;s a  pretty extreme</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That post is enough, but I did look at her Twitter feed too. She's clearly anti-classic-Dem, looks forward to them all being replaced with "The Squad" types. I would not be surprised if she was anti-Pelosi, too, too much of a compromiser. It's a very common syndrome in NYC. This is why we ended up with Republican mayors being elected, the activists are very lefty and get this impression that everyone in the city is like all their Brooklyn friends. Alas, the quiet centrists also end up voting too....</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:24:37 +0000 artappraiser comment 275611 at http://dagblog.com That's a  pretty extreme http://dagblog.com/comment/275608#comment-275608 <a id="comment-275608"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275605#comment-275605">So far, after checking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's a  pretty extreme analysis. I don't get anything near that from what I've read of Mara Gay. Do you have anything to support your analysis?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:15:25 +0000 ocean-kat comment 275608 at http://dagblog.com So far, after checking http://dagblog.com/comment/275605#comment-275605 <a id="comment-275605"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275594#comment-275594">A bit of Wokeness into every</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So far, after checking further, looking like she's a divider type of woke, not a uniter, all for primarying anyone that got elected before 2016? (The party formerly know as Democratic, now a bunch of reactionary scum? Or maybe like: <em>boomers: kill them all</em>? Hillary a machine pol for sure, maybe even a Nazi.)<em>  </em>We'll see. </p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>“The party machine can’t stop us.” Great <a href="https://twitter.com/hgoldman77?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@hgoldman77</a> story <a href="https://t.co/wCyW2CHGdm">https://t.co/wCyW2CHGdm</a></p> — Mara Gay (@MaraGay) <a href="https://twitter.com/MaraGay/status/1220450356280340481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 23, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Jan 2020 01:59:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 275605 at http://dagblog.com Reading Brooks, Friedman, and http://dagblog.com/comment/275601#comment-275601 <a id="comment-275601"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275597#comment-275597">Similar comments were made by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Reading Brooks, Friedman, and Dowd is an excellent cure for insomnia.</p> <p>Jamelle Bouie and Charles Blow, for example, offer different views of issues. The NYT is trying to maintain relevancy.</p> <p>Bob Herbert, who filled a similar role, retired</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:14:15 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 275601 at http://dagblog.com Similar comments were made by http://dagblog.com/comment/275597#comment-275597 <a id="comment-275597"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275592#comment-275592">side topic, re: your headline</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Similar comments were made by other writers at the NYT</p> <blockquote> <p>Her remarks ricocheted across the Democratic Party on Tuesday, threatening to reopen the barely healed wounds of the 2016 primary, a race that quickly turned from a near-coronation of Mrs. Clinton as the party’s first female nominee into a bitter battle that exposed a deep ideological rift among Democrats.</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders.html</a></p> <p>From Politico</p> <blockquote> <p>Hillary Clinton lambasted Bernie Sanders in a forthcoming documentary as a “career politician” who “nobody likes,” savaging her rival for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination less than two weeks before the 2020 Iowa caucuses.</p> <p>The brutal remarks reopened longstanding party wounds, with multiple Obama White House alumni knocking Clinton, Sanders supporters galvanizing behind their candidate, and current and former Clinton aides rushing to her defense.</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/21/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-2020-election-101339">https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/21/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-2020-election-101339</a></p> <p>Seems that she got the story right. The NYT has been looking for a younger audience. Age does not mean that she is not qualified</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:43:15 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 275597 at http://dagblog.com A bit of Wokeness into every http://dagblog.com/comment/275594#comment-275594 <a id="comment-275594"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/275592#comment-275592">side topic, re: your headline</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A bit of Wokeness into every life must fall.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:09:28 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275594 at http://dagblog.com