dagblog - Comments for "SDNY supporting weird atty-client privilege vs Parnas" http://dagblog.com/link/sdny-supporting-weird-atty-client-privilege-vs-parnas-30136 Comments for "SDNY supporting weird atty-client privilege vs Parnas" en Andrew P. Napolitano: “What http://dagblog.com/comment/275834#comment-275834 <a id="comment-275834"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sdny-supporting-weird-atty-client-privilege-vs-parnas-30136">SDNY supporting weird atty-client privilege vs Parnas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Andrew P. Napolitano: “What does it take to remove a president?” <a href="https://twitter.com/Judgenap?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@judgenap</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/washtimesoped?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#washtimesoped</a><a href="https://t.co/0cmx0ozUFf">https://t.co/0cmx0ozUFf</a></p> — WashTimesOpinion (@WashTimesOpEd) <a href="https://twitter.com/WashTimesOpEd/status/1220128451904012296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:03:54 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 275834 at http://dagblog.com