dagblog - Comments for "Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176 Comments for "Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff" en 11 months later, we got http://dagblog.com/comment/295672#comment-295672 <a id="comment-295672"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>11 months later, we got BREAKING!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">BREAKING: An Iowa Democratic Party audit found that DNC meddling, combined with missteps by the state Democratic Party, were the primary drivers of the chaos that torpedoed the Iowa caucuses earlier this year <a href="https://t.co/b3ozCoE3HF">https://t.co/b3ozCoE3HF</a></p> — POLITICO (@politico) <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1337818701727485954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:40:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 295672 at http://dagblog.com Pete won it, verified, 14 http://dagblog.com/comment/277120#comment-277120 <a id="comment-277120"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pete won it, verified, 14 delegates to Bernie's 12:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">BREAKING: Recount of Iowa Caucuses show small changes to totals, but no change to national delegates. <a href="https://twitter.com/PeteButtigieg?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@peteButtigieg</a> wins the Caucus with 14 nat'l delegates. <a href="https://twitter.com/SenSanders?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenSanders</a> with 12. <a href="https://t.co/9rxa8Ibnna">pic.twitter.com/9rxa8Ibnna</a></p> — Nick Weig (@tbweig) <a href="https://twitter.com/tbweig/status/1233185867793125384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2020 02:39:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 277120 at http://dagblog.com I recall a lot of "fairy tale http://dagblog.com/comment/276194#comment-276194 <a id="comment-276194"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276079#comment-276079">Iowa is not representative of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I recall a lot of "fairy tale" hype to make Bill a racist along with "Hillary didn't cry during Katrina" dog whistles to make that early internal South Carolina polling spread work. Pollsters always seem to believe their own bullshit anyway.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:42:51 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 276194 at http://dagblog.com A tie with Buttigieg and http://dagblog.com/comment/276191#comment-276191 <a id="comment-276191"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ends in a tie at the top with Buttigieg and Sanders each a little less than 550 delegates, Warren 381, Biden 331, and Klobuchar 255.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>With 97% of precincts reporting, <a href="https://twitter.com/PeteButtigieg?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PeteButtigieg</a>’s lead over <a href="https://twitter.com/BernieSanders?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BernieSanders</a> is down to 0.1%.<br /><br /> Safe to say they will both leave the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IowaCaucuses?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IowaCaucuses</a> with the same number of delegates.<br /><br /><a href="https://t.co/nseYNRCOjF">https://t.co/nseYNRCOjF</a> <a href="https://t.co/PYXW7ClkIF">pic.twitter.com/PYXW7ClkIF</a></p> — Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) <a href="https://twitter.com/FrankLuntz/status/1225315723578265602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 6, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Except for silly political horse race junkies who think this is like a sports game where somebody wins something because they got the highest number: This says they are all still very much in the running and WTF IS WRONG WITH THAT? Good thing, no? Who got hurt? Nobody! They all still got a chance, the supposed "lack of diversity" somehow delivered a diverse result, eh?These are all a pitifully small number of delegates makes no sense to blow it up as such an important indicator that Pete and Bernie got a few more than the others. Cmon, that's ridiculous, it's more like a 5 way tie. Too many falling for political horse race b.s. Early Iowa caucus is simply an indicator and a training ground about ability of face-to-face selling, see who's got the stamina and staying power. Well this time, five of them do.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:29:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 276191 at http://dagblog.com Why @JoeBiden finished fourth http://dagblog.com/comment/276175#comment-276175 <a id="comment-276175"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Why <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeBiden?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeBiden</a> finished fourth in Iowa<br /><br /> w/ <a href="https://twitter.com/katieglueck?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@katieglueck</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/thomaskaplan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@thomaskaplan</a> <a href="https://t.co/Wf2b4NBEyl">https://t.co/Wf2b4NBEyl</a></p> — Jonathan Martin (@jmartNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1225150524993032192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:58:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 276175 at http://dagblog.com Look at the difference in http://dagblog.com/comment/276174#comment-276174 <a id="comment-276174"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Look at the difference in Sanders and Warren numbers, pre- and post-correction — these are significant differences. Lord. <a href="https://t.co/DkaWE5lJuL">https://t.co/DkaWE5lJuL</a></p> — MJ Lee (@mj_lee) <a href="https://twitter.com/mj_lee/status/1225184323395035136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:41:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 276174 at http://dagblog.com She's just bitter. http://dagblog.com/comment/276164#comment-276164 <a id="comment-276164"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276157#comment-276157">Iowa held over 80 satellite</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>She's just bitter.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Feb 2020 21:34:51 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 276164 at http://dagblog.com good way to put it: http://dagblog.com/comment/276161#comment-276161 <a id="comment-276161"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>good way to put it:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">If this pans out, the basic upshot is Pete Buttigieg wins the electoral college and Bernie Sanders wins the popular vote in Iowa. <a href="https://t.co/Sa7boIC6oO">https://t.co/Sa7boIC6oO</a></p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1225152443358552064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:12:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 276161 at http://dagblog.com Iowa held over 80 satellite http://dagblog.com/comment/276157#comment-276157 <a id="comment-276157"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Iowa held over 80 satellite caucuses. These were primarily for<br /><br /> * non-English speakers<br /> * students<br /> * people whose jobs didn't allow them to go to regular caucusing locations<br /> *disabled and elderly people<br /><br /> NONE of their votes have been counted yet</p> — Molly Crabapple (@mollycrabapple) <a href="https://twitter.com/mollycrabapple/status/1225107093591597057?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:46:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 276157 at http://dagblog.com Nate Silver updates from a http://dagblog.com/comment/276152#comment-276152 <a id="comment-276152"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/iowa-caucus-related-news-and-stuff-30176">Iowa Caucus News and Related Stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nate Silver updates from a few minutes ago:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">State delegate equivalents with new Iowa data<br /> Buttigieg 26.9 (+0.1)<br /> Sanders 25.2 (-)<br /> Warren 18.2 (-0.2)<br /> Biden 15.6 (+0.2)<br /> Klobuchar 12.5 (-0.1)</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1225138367274323974?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Final alignment with new Iowa data<br /> Sanders 26.1 (-0.1)<br /> Buttigieg 25.3 (+0.1)<br /> Warren 20.3 (-0.4)<br /> Biden 13.5 (+0.3)<br /> Klobuchar 12.3 (-0.2)</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1225138730517909504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">According to The Needle, Buttigieg is up to 86% to win on SDEs. Sanders is 94% to win the first alignment and 60% to win the final alignment. <a href="https://t.co/l64PetfzP0">https://t.co/l64PetfzP0</a></p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1225139651725479938?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:26:21 +0000 artappraiser comment 276152 at http://dagblog.com