dagblog - Comments for "“We’re losing our damn minds”: James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party" http://dagblog.com/link/we-re-losing-our-damn-minds-james-carville-unloads-democratic-party-30219 Comments for "“We’re losing our damn minds”: James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party" en Food fight! Two old guys! http://dagblog.com/comment/276599#comment-276599 <a id="comment-276599"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/we-re-losing-our-damn-minds-james-carville-unloads-democratic-party-30219">“We’re losing our damn minds”: James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Food fight! Two old guys!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">James Carville fires back after Bernie Sanders calls him a "political hack": "At least I'm not a communist" <a href="https://t.co/xdp2UaPc57">https://t.co/xdp2UaPc57</a> <a href="https://t.co/MNgrNYy5Mg">pic.twitter.com/MNgrNYy5Mg</a></p> — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/1228125474418806787?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 14 Feb 2020 06:14:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 276599 at http://dagblog.com FWIW, it appears Bloomberg http://dagblog.com/comment/276377#comment-276377 <a id="comment-276377"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276348#comment-276348">Democrats need to spend less</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FWIW, it appears Bloomberg and Bloomberg's advisors believe in doing just the opposite of that:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Our country has a rich history of presidents who respected the power, decorum, and influence of their office.<br /><br /> Unfortunately, that rich history ended the day Trump became president. <a href="https://t.co/3QEncsTiNA">pic.twitter.com/3QEncsTiNA</a></p> — Mike Bloomberg (@MikeBloomberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeBloomberg/status/1226580658807504897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>I have a small suspicion that he might be doing that, spending all that money on Trump character attacks allover the place, so that the other candidates don't have to? But I could absolutely be wrong about that. Why? Cause Bloomberg is egotisical in a much different way than Trump, he likes to prove that he is an excellent manager who can solve any problem, that's what he gets off on. The<em> real</em> stable genius thing, wants to be in the history books as that but also just enjoys doing it. This whole thing can err on the side of dictatorial, though.</p> <p>Edit to add, look at his slogan on the Twitter home page: <em>WE WILL GET IT DONE.</em> Whatever it is. The trains WILL run on time.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2020 23:40:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 276377 at http://dagblog.com So is this kid an influencer http://dagblog.com/comment/276373#comment-276373 <a id="comment-276373"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276369#comment-276369">How to talk to Gen-Z /</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So is this kid an influencer or not? And what pronoun(s) does <s>he </s> they prefer to use?</p> <p>Whatever the case, for some reason, <a href="https://twitter.com/SJGrunewald/status/1226230923265339393">methinks he needs to be careful about trusting liberal populist boomers.</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2020 23:00:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 276373 at http://dagblog.com How to talk to Gen-Z / http://dagblog.com/comment/276369#comment-276369 <a id="comment-276369"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/we-re-losing-our-damn-minds-james-carville-unloads-democratic-party-30219">“We’re losing our damn minds”: James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How to talk to Gen-Z / millennials for social s curity recipients (rather than "well, we're going to lose anyway...")</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Every DC think tank panel ever <a href="https://t.co/KRUYtYNmzC">pic.twitter.com/KRUYtYNmzC</a></p> — Allegra Harpootlian (@ally_harp) <a href="https://twitter.com/ally_harp/status/1226201576416665602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2020 22:23:37 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 276369 at http://dagblog.com Democrats need to spend less http://dagblog.com/comment/276348#comment-276348 <a id="comment-276348"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276345#comment-276345">Well here you go. Thank god</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Democrats need to spend less time attacking Trump’s character and his ego, and more time going after the horrific things he’s actually doing as president.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2020 06:08:18 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 276348 at http://dagblog.com Well here you go. Thank god http://dagblog.com/comment/276345#comment-276345 <a id="comment-276345"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276324#comment-276324">Clinton won 1st time because</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well here you go. Thank god for Carville, he's figured it out. I was so wrong when I said no one knows how to beat Trump. Carville know not only how to win over 400 electoral votes but 55 votes in the senate. I'd like to introduce to you, the next president of the United States, <a href="https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/watch-james-carville-launches-epic-rant-obliterating-the-myth-of-trumps-invincibility/">Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO)</a>.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Feb 2020 01:28:03 +0000 ocean-kat comment 276345 at http://dagblog.com more along the lines of http://dagblog.com/comment/276326#comment-276326 <a id="comment-276326"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276290#comment-276290">Another version of the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>more along the lines of <em>People experience life as individuals not groups.</em></p> <p><em> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">the intellectual dark web &amp; social justice warriors are the same.<br /><br /> &gt; they blast perceived enemies &amp; biases, but ultimately are undermined by in-group battles for power<br /> &gt; they talk about outgroup sociopathy, but rarely deal with one another as human beings</p> — uberfeminist (@uberfeminist) <a href="https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/1226268497912762368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </em></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">social justice warriors = pedantic aspergers<br /><br /> intellectual dark web = pedantic aspergers, but this time right wing</p> — uberfeminist (@uberfeminist) <a href="https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/1226268958791098368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Feb 2020 22:14:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 276326 at http://dagblog.com Clinton won 1st time because http://dagblog.com/comment/276324#comment-276324 <a id="comment-276324"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276323#comment-276323">Yeah, how to beat Trump is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Clinton won 1st time because of Perot, maybe 2nd time as well (he got roughly same as Dole + Perot, but on an electoral basis may have been the clincher). Republicans have been using some similar tricks for a while now - would think we could counter, but we're slow learners. Shady stuff in Ohio for Kerry, shady in FL for Gore, shady in PA, MI, WI and MN for Hillary. But these aren't the tiny states choosing the Senate. I dunno what the message is, but pretty sure "white people don't count" isn't it.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:32:04 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 276324 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, how to beat Trump is a http://dagblog.com/comment/276323#comment-276323 <a id="comment-276323"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/276317#comment-276317">Steyer: how to beat Trump?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, how to beat Trump is a good and important question. But I've seen no evidence anyone knows the answer. If we had that answer Carter would have won a second term, Mondale and Dukakis would have won, Gore and Kerry would have won. All of them were establishment picks to one degree or another. All of them were considered the safe choice. I'm not saying we should take a chance on a left candidate instead of the moderate. I'm saying no one really knows.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:38:34 +0000 ocean-kat comment 276323 at http://dagblog.com Steyer: how to beat Trump? http://dagblog.com/comment/276317#comment-276317 <a id="comment-276317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/we-re-losing-our-damn-minds-james-carville-unloads-democratic-party-30219">“We’re losing our damn minds”: James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Steyer: how to beat Trump?</p> <p><a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-steyer-democratic-debate-defeat-donald-trump-949773/amp/">https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-steyer-democrati...</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:44:38 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 276317 at http://dagblog.com