dagblog - Comments for "1619 project&#039;s &quot;Ida Bae Wells&quot; demonstrates a new kind of professionalism for historians" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/1619-projects-ida-bae-wells-demonstrates-new-kind-professionalism-historians-30312 Comments for "1619 project's "Ida Bae Wells" demonstrates a new kind of professionalism for historians" en John McWhorter: http://dagblog.com/comment/281351#comment-281351 <a id="comment-281351"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/1619-projects-ida-bae-wells-demonstrates-new-kind-professionalism-historians-30312">1619 project&#039;s &quot;Ida Bae Wells&quot; demonstrates a new kind of professionalism for historians</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>John McWhorter:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A while ago I wrote a short piece about the 1619 idea. Here I stretch out more. Nota bene: I wrote this a while before Jones’ Pulitzer; this is in response not to that, but the larger issues. <a href="https://t.co/VkyELIZwrV">https://t.co/VkyELIZwrV</a></p> — John McWhorter (@JohnHMcWhorter) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnHMcWhorter/status/1259475118943698944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 10, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>quote from the above:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">“The 1619 perspective, for all of its elaborate terminology and moral passion vented in serious media organs and entertained by people with PhDs, demands that we abjure complexity. It is a call for dumbing ourselves down in the name of a moral crusade” <a href="https://t.co/0STE4hLWrc">https://t.co/0STE4hLWrc</a></p> — Josh Kraushaar (@HotlineJosh) <a href="https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1259819470245199872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>McWhorter and Glenn Loury discuss Hannah-Jones Pulitzer here:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">My latest podcast with John McWhorter discusses the Pulitzer Prize awarded to Nicole Hannah-Jones/New York Times for the 1619 Project (warning: we're not happy about it!)<a href="https://t.co/7DnM9aucnH">https://t.co/7DnM9aucnH</a></p> — Glenn Loury (@GlennLoury) <a href="https://twitter.com/GlennLoury/status/1258775484457988097?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Glenn and I had a good talk about the implications of the 1619 Project getting a Pulitzer and the broader issue of black America's degree of "agency" in solving its problems. We kind of wandered, but then we always do. <a href="https://t.co/AAMzOB2bLq">https://t.co/AAMzOB2bLq</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/YouTube?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@YouTube</a></p> — John McWhorter (@JohnHMcWhorter) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnHMcWhorter/status/1258112033486233601?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 6, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 May 2020 12:14:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 281351 at http://dagblog.com Sound of 1 brain cell http://dagblog.com/comment/281085#comment-281085 <a id="comment-281085"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281084#comment-281084">I&#039;m laughing at you, not with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sound of 1 brain cell clapping</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 13:22:04 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281085 at http://dagblog.com I'm laughing at you, not with http://dagblog.com/comment/281084#comment-281084 <a id="comment-281084"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281082#comment-281082">Huh? The Romanians switched</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm laughing at you, not with you.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 13:18:02 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281084 at http://dagblog.com Huh? The Romanians switched http://dagblog.com/comment/281082#comment-281082 <a id="comment-281082"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281081#comment-281081">Thanks for repeating what I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Huh? The Romanians switched sides twice to come out winners both times, certainly weren't slaves - they were independent countries and they knew when their side was losing &amp; when to switch. Hey, my Mom was fixing pancakes and then decided to have mushroom soup instead - guess she chose the Romanian option, just like those black guys in the Revolutionary War.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 13:06:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281082 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for repeating what I http://dagblog.com/comment/281081#comment-281081 <a id="comment-281081"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281079#comment-281079">You, like 1000s of other</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for repeating what I said.</p> <p>There were small numbers of blacks who used the Romanian option and were freed by the colonists and others by the British. Romanians probably got the idea from black people.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 12:44:55 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281081 at http://dagblog.com You, like 1000s of other http://dagblog.com/comment/281079#comment-281079 <a id="comment-281079"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281073#comment-281073">I noted that the British used</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You, like 1000s of other people, noted that the British used enslaved people as pawns.<br /> Blacks fought in small numbers on both sides of the Revolutionary War, and were not likely to gain much in the end.<br /> (Romania switched to the winning side at the end of both World Wars - them's the guys you want to learn from)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 12:37:45 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281079 at http://dagblog.com I noted that the British used http://dagblog.com/comment/281073#comment-281073 <a id="comment-281073"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281069#comment-281069">Black Loyalists also went to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I noted that the British used enslaved people as pawns.</p> <p>Blacks fought on both sides of the Revolutionary War and still lost.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 10:53:03 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281073 at http://dagblog.com Yawn http://dagblog.com/comment/281072#comment-281072 <a id="comment-281072"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281064#comment-281064">A Marxian reinterpretation of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yawn</p> <p>New research into the facts. You are stuck and predictable.</p> <p>Wilentz sent out a letter asking for backup and was rejected by most.</p> <p>One posted his objections on a Socialist website</p> <p><a href="https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/18/oake-n18.html">https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/18/oake-n18.html</a></p> <p>Oh, the horror</p> <p>You are just a guy standing on the lawn yelling, longing for the past when views of history were mostly whitebread, as Painter pointed out.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 10:51:20 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281072 at http://dagblog.com Black Loyalists also went to http://dagblog.com/comment/281069#comment-281069 <a id="comment-281069"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281053#comment-281053">Your popcorn is burnt. From</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Black Loyalists also went to Bahamas and Barbados and thereby spent another 60 years in slavery (Maryland or better PA would've been a better choice)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 06:33:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281069 at http://dagblog.com A Marxian reinterpretation of http://dagblog.com/comment/281064#comment-281064 <a id="comment-281064"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281062#comment-281062">Books already out</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A Marxian reinterpretation of history - who woulda guessed. My favorite was Founding Father's anticipating cotton farming on the moon, starting the Need African Slave Astronauts program right under the eyes of unwitting abolitionists.</p> <p>The Brits also offered to free slaves in the War of 1812, which is considered one of the major causes of the Revolution, along with the need to grow cotton along the Ohio River which promoted the French-Indian War (though if crops didn't work out, the Founding Fathers anticipated car factories and steel mills as a "Plan B"</p> <p>Whee, ain't history fun! Look, Ma! No hands!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 06 May 2020 04:37:11 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281064 at http://dagblog.com