dagblog - Comments for "The Superdelegate Squabble" http://dagblog.com/link/superdelagate-squabble-30378 Comments for "The Superdelegate Squabble" en thinking how Minnie Pearl http://dagblog.com/comment/277187#comment-277187 <a id="comment-277187"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277186#comment-277186">Yeah, Minnie Pearl - good eye</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thinking how Minnie Pearl style self-deprecation pretty much a good sign of successful assimilation going on</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:13:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 277187 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, Minnie Pearl - good eye http://dagblog.com/comment/277186#comment-277186 <a id="comment-277186"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277185#comment-277185">Actually very intriguing! I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, Minnie Pearl - good eye for a bargain buy tie.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:30:07 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 277186 at http://dagblog.com Actually very intriguing! I http://dagblog.com/comment/277185#comment-277185 <a id="comment-277185"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277177#comment-277177">There are criteria for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually very intriguing! I clearly am missing a lot of the jokes. What is the price tag on the hat about? Is he basically <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnie_Pearl">the Minnie Pearl</a> of rap?</p> <p>All that said, Steyer's tie hits me as a richer signifier, more irony. It's very WASP--Tartan!</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:20:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 277185 at http://dagblog.com There are criteria for http://dagblog.com/comment/277177#comment-277177 <a id="comment-277177"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277174#comment-277174">JuvieTheGreat disagrees with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There are criteria for wearing a tie while rapping - cf. the Hump:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="416px" width="568px"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="416px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PBsjggc5jHM" width="568px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:13:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 277177 at http://dagblog.com JuvieTheGreat disagrees with http://dagblog.com/comment/277174#comment-277174 <a id="comment-277174"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277137#comment-277137">I wish Tom Steyer had stayed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>JuvieTheGreat disagrees with you on Steyer, PP <img alt="surprise" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/omg_smile.png" title="surprise" width="23" /></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">And he backed that azz up right into history. <a href="https://twitter.com/juviethegreat?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@juviethegreat</a> made his first ever presidential endorsement: <a href="https://twitter.com/TomSteyer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TomSteyer</a> <a href="https://t.co/RpVUbnKQlM">pic.twitter.com/RpVUbnKQlM</a></p> — Daniel Newhauser (@dnewhauser) <a href="https://twitter.com/dnewhauser/status/1233585799179964416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Feb 2020 03:11:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 277174 at http://dagblog.com Whatever Warren's up to, she http://dagblog.com/comment/277170#comment-277170 <a id="comment-277170"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277128#comment-277128">NEW: Warren super PAC plunges</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Whatever Warren's up to, she's taking big risks as far as possibly alienating the lefty base:</p> <p><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/elizabeth-warren-super-pac-run-by-former-oil-advocacy-group-frontman/">Elizabeth Warren Super PAC Run by Former ‘Oil Advocacy Group’ Frontman</a></p> <p>@ LawandCrime.com | 6:03 pm, February 28th, 2020</p> <p>She's also smart enough to know all the purity testing stuff ends at the convention. Doing an "ends justify the means" at this point?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Feb 2020 02:18:14 +0000 artappraiser comment 277170 at http://dagblog.com The current rules are Sanders http://dagblog.com/comment/277138#comment-277138 <a id="comment-277138"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277136#comment-277136">Obama&#039;s followers hated</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The current rules are Sanders' creation. He was heavily involved in the rules that exist today.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:20:08 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 277138 at http://dagblog.com I wish Tom Steyer had stayed http://dagblog.com/comment/277137#comment-277137 <a id="comment-277137"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277128#comment-277128">NEW: Warren super PAC plunges</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I wish Tom Steyer had stayed out of the race and continued to pump money into Democratic candidates.<br /> Is that a "SuperPAC"? I don't care. THe Republicans have crooked Saudi &amp; Russian money, NRA money, huge billionaire donors, assholes like Karl Rove doing their PACs, and a variety of other legal and illegal sources of money. At this point I just care about someone smart enough to win, preferably understanding coattails to bring in others who will support an agenda. Do SuperPACS imply compromise? Fine, cut off that 10-15% of the progressive agenda if it's not the most important part and call it the price of doing business. Elections have consequences, being rich &amp; embedded into the business/power structure has consequences. We're getting slaughtered except for Nov 2018, and we seem to have lost the focus that made those midterms a success.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:10:44 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 277137 at http://dagblog.com Obama's followers hated http://dagblog.com/comment/277136#comment-277136 <a id="comment-277136"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/superdelagate-squabble-30378">The Superdelegate Squabble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama's followers hated Superdelegates until he got enough of them.<br /> Bernie hates Superdelegates because he's not tied into the party mechanism.</p> <p>As has been known for a while, Superdelegates are one party mechanism to avoid suicide.<br /> We may need it this year. It's less undemocratic than Caucuses - Superdelegates are people<br /> who put in work, chaperone the party to a more winning position.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:03:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 277136 at http://dagblog.com NEW: Warren super PAC plunges http://dagblog.com/comment/277128#comment-277128 <a id="comment-277128"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/superdelagate-squabble-30378">The Superdelegate Squabble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">NEW: Warren super PAC plunges $9 MILLION into Super Tuesday states.<br /><br /> Warren likely now has the biggest super PAC of the cycle, or at least close to it. <a href="https://t.co/TOoIP0GW31">pic.twitter.com/TOoIP0GW31</a></p> — Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShaneGoldmacher/status/1233218817398013953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Here is an ad Elizabeth Warren spent $679,000 running more than 2,000 times in Iowa in which she said:<br /><br /> "I'm not cozying up to super PACs"<br /><br /> Now she has the biggest one in the 2020 Democratic field.<a href="https://t.co/kbpxbqbbZK">https://t.co/kbpxbqbbZK</a> <a href="https://t.co/uneDmOGJ5B">pic.twitter.com/uneDmOGJ5B</a></p> — Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShaneGoldmacher/status/1233232449133518849?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>The following USA Today piece is not by horse race junkies but by<em> Robert Alexander, director of the Institute for Civics and Public Policy at Ohio Northern University, is author of "<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Representation-Electoral-College-Robert-Alexander/dp/0190939435" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Representation and the Electoral College</a>." Lauren Copeland is an assistant professor and associate director of the Community Research Institute at Baldwin Wallace University</em></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Warren has revived her 2020 campaign and could be the nominee who unites the Democrats <a href="https://t.co/633vDvKIO0">https://t.co/633vDvKIO0</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/USATODAY?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@usatoday</a></p> — Charlotte Clymer (@cmclymer) <a href="https://twitter.com/cmclymer/status/1233161227301466113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:55:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 277128 at http://dagblog.com