dagblog - Comments for "Texas closes minority polls" http://dagblog.com/link/texas-closes-minority-polls-30408 Comments for "Texas closes minority polls" en Arg, you ruined my outrage http://dagblog.com/comment/277274#comment-277274 <a id="comment-277274"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/277273#comment-277273">I read the whole thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Arg, you ruined my outrage</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 02 Mar 2020 16:04:55 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 277274 at http://dagblog.com I read the whole thing http://dagblog.com/comment/277273#comment-277273 <a id="comment-277273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/texas-closes-minority-polls-30408">Texas closes minority polls</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I read the whole thing carefully. Second half of the article, starting with the paragraph that starts </p> <p><em>The rush of poll closures in Texas cannot be attributed to any one policy. Just over half of the closures are part of a push toward centralized, countywide polling places, called “vote centers”....</em></p> <p>suggests the problem is much more complex than a lot of direct manipulation by GOP powers that be that is suggested by headlines.</p> <p>Says straight out some Dems were for vote centers. It's the vote centers thing is where the growth in minority population is. Suggests more like: they were trying something new bt it's a mess.  And that made me recall that I recently read that California is also transitioning to vote centers and might be a messy primary because of it.</p> <p>And also second last sentence suggests, in the low population areas: somebody's got to come up with some mon-ay if they want to keep some places open where there is little voting traffic <em>Elections officials have cited tight budgets and difficulty recruiting poll workers as among the reasons for the reductions. </em>Mr. Steyer, Mr. Bloomberg? I bet: nope, because they want bang for their buck, too, not going to pay for a full day of workers to get 8 more votes? And here in the following we are back to the concept where you have to beg people to want to vote</p> <p><em>And activists argue that low turnout at a particular polling place is not a reason to close it – it is a sign that the turnout itself, which is typically lower in Latinx neighborhoods, must be addressed. Closing a polling station for reasons of low turnout can have a discriminatory impact, activists say.</em></p> <p>You have to beg them like a season ahead of time. So that you can agitate for a significant number of voters need a station.And get the mon-ay to pay for it. Since you have to do it in advance, why not just frigging agitate to get them to send in absentee ballots? Problem solved.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:46:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 277273 at http://dagblog.com