dagblog - Comments for "Wisconsin is Rising Up!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/wisconsin-rising-30731 Comments for "Wisconsin is Rising Up!" en (picks self up off floor...) http://dagblog.com/comment/280287#comment-280287 <a id="comment-280287"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279754#comment-279754">You want skirt? Here&#039;s skirt.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>(picks self up off floor...) I just played this...outstanding!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:40:50 +0000 jollyroger comment 280287 at http://dagblog.com BAGPIPES!! http://dagblog.com/comment/280286#comment-280286 <a id="comment-280286"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280284#comment-280284">WI&#039;s suburban W-O-W counties</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>BAGPIPES!!</strong></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:38:44 +0000 jollyroger comment 280286 at http://dagblog.com WI's suburban W-O-W counties http://dagblog.com/comment/280284#comment-280284 <a id="comment-280284"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/wisconsin-rising-30731">Wisconsin is Rising Up!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">WI's suburban W-O-W counties outside MKE are no longer the same juggernaut for GOP they were pre-Trump, esp. Ozaukee, Waukesha. Same voting pattern in 16 (pres), 18 (gov), 20 (WI sup ct): smaller landslides, lesser margins.<br /> whither WOW counties? a look: <a href="https://t.co/XbFb8aAFaU">https://t.co/XbFb8aAFaU</a></p> — Craig Gilbert (@WisVoter) <a href="https://twitter.com/WisVoter/status/1252203252713549825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:05:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 280284 at http://dagblog.com You want skirt? Here's skirt. http://dagblog.com/comment/279754#comment-279754 <a id="comment-279754"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279753#comment-279753">Well, ok, maybe...But don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You want skirt? Here's skirt.<br /> (Age appropriate, NQSFW)<br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">ENERGY!!! <a href="https://t.co/EFdk2ygtBn">pic.twitter.com/EFdk2ygtBn</a></p> — call gunna if you want you a birkin (@KiaSpeaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/KiaSpeaks/status/1249408771404845063?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:56:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 279754 at http://dagblog.com Well, ok, maybe...But don't http://dagblog.com/comment/279753#comment-279753 <a id="comment-279753"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279725#comment-279725">The state mostly leans red</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, ok, maybe...But don't expect me to give up on the skirt...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:42:16 +0000 jollyroger comment 279753 at http://dagblog.com So we might not count on a http://dagblog.com/comment/279744#comment-279744 <a id="comment-279744"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279725#comment-279725">The state mostly leans red</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So we might not count on a national uprising of disgusted independents based on Wisconsin, but it's still a good sign that rapacious dangerous partisan affronts don't always succeed.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:42:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 279744 at http://dagblog.com The state mostly leans red http://dagblog.com/comment/279725#comment-279725 <a id="comment-279725"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279716#comment-279716">The open primary is relevant</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The state mostly leans red because it is mostly more rural people who don't like someone coming from far away and saying they are from the government and are there to help when the supposed helpers don't have a clue what's actually been going on in the locality. Only Madison and Milwaukee leans blue. Many from both camps are open to a trial with independent thinking radicals (hence characters like Trump, Paul Ryan and even way back when: Bob LaFollette types can be given a chance to do it their way.)</p> <p>As I said, I  haven't seen or looked at any stats (Marquette University polling would be the one to go to for that) But I would suspect it took a number of red leaners really pissed off at what the state GOP was trying to do to rig election partisan with a purge to add to voters leaning blue in order to elect the judge:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>One short-term impact of the liberal’s court win in Wisconsin will be on the fight over a purge of 200k voters. Court had been split 3-3 with a conservative joining the 2 liberals and Kelly abstaining due to this election. So there’s now a 4-3 majority against the purge.</p> — Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) <a href="https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1249852726516867072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>The Wisconsin I know is just not political party partisans. Yes there are lots of rabid conservatives,and moderates and liberals, and also many libertarians. <em>They vote for individuals</em>.  If you listened to political talk radio there a while, you'd see it. (Charlie Sykes is one example, before going national, he was a big radio star for a long time.) I don't see judges and political parties taking away voting rights to be too popular. They knew the solution.</p> <p>Edit to add: now that I think on it, I can't think of any Wisconsite I ever met that said they were a proud Democrat nor a proud Republican. They'll say more descriptive things like "I'm an FDR Democrat" or "I mostly agree with Limbaugh".</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 04:18:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 279725 at http://dagblog.com The open primary is relevant http://dagblog.com/comment/279716#comment-279716 <a id="comment-279716"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279707#comment-279707">Hah,don&#039;t be ridiculous, this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The open primary is relevant to the  judicial election how?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:45:52 +0000 jollyroger comment 279716 at http://dagblog.com Hah,don't be ridiculous, this http://dagblog.com/comment/279707#comment-279707 <a id="comment-279707"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279700#comment-279700">DoubleA, it&#039;s time to rethink</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Huh? don't be ridiculous, this is working within the system as it is, no revolution at all.</p> <p>Look, I haven't read any articles but the thing prognosticators would really want to know here, <u>since it's an open primary,</u> is how many people who describe themselves as "Republican" came out to vote for Democrats because they are pissed about either Trump or about how their own GOP Statehouse has been acting.</p> <p>Wisconsin is the whole swing thing in exquisite microcosm, this thing is how Trump won the electoral college in the first place and within the stats is the answer on whether his losing is a sure thing. I think that goes for flipping the Senate too. If pissed off normally GOP voters come out and vote for Dems,<u> that's the real turnout one wants.</u></p> <p>(cavaet: these are independent contrarian and/or idiosyncratic people, so winner beware: they'll probably turn against you next time because they didn't like what ya did.)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:05:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 279707 at http://dagblog.com DoubleA, it's time to rethink http://dagblog.com/comment/279700#comment-279700 <a id="comment-279700"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/279692#comment-279692">Things are proceeding well,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>DoubleA, it's time to rethink your apostasy..</p> <p> </p> <p>Come home to *the girl you were.....Emma will forgive you. </p> <p> </p> <p>The People, United, Will Never Be Defeated.</p> <p> </p> <p>Hasta La Victoria Siempre.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>*ETA Roll up that Catholic School skirt...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:54:36 +0000 jollyroger comment 279700 at http://dagblog.com