http://dagblog.com/link/relentless-jailhouse-lawyer-propels-case-supreme-court-30953 Comments for "A Relentless Jailhouse Lawyer Propels a Case to the Supreme Court" en http://dagblog.com/comment/280349#comment-280349 <a id="comment-280349"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/relentless-jailhouse-lawyer-propels-case-supreme-court-30953">A Relentless Jailhouse Lawyer Propels a Case to the Supreme Court</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>He won a unanimous ruling. Just on the personal story, is the stuff of a Hollywood movie:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution banned non-unanimous jury verdicts in cases involving serious crimes. The decision will affect cases in Louisiana and Oregon, the only 2 states that have recently allowed such verdicts. <a href="https://t.co/o3E9bNfGCO">https://t.co/o3E9bNfGCO</a></p> — The New York Times (@nytimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1252416800429453314?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>(I am of course referring to the olden days with my comment; probably not going to be the same kind of "Hollywood movie anyway, maybe more like Netflix Megahit, something like that.)</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:11:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 280349 at http://dagblog.com