dagblog - Comments for "Only a fully Federally funded economy til vaccine makes sense" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/only-fully-federally-funded-economy-til-vaccine-makes-sense-31027 Comments for "Only a fully Federally funded economy til vaccine makes sense" en In a  sort of " moderate" http://dagblog.com/comment/280813#comment-280813 <a id="comment-280813"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280790#comment-280790">Indeed no individual should</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In a  sort of " moderate" tracing regime, you get a call outta nowhere, you feel fine, but a guy is coming in the morning to test you for active virus,</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:14:38 +0000 jollyroger comment 280813 at http://dagblog.com And I meant sick as in sick, http://dagblog.com/comment/280795#comment-280795 <a id="comment-280795"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280794#comment-280794">By &quot;sick&quot; I meant infected.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And I meant sick as in sick, whatever the cause. </p> <p>Because there's that plenty of people don't get sick enough for hospitalization with infection. They get well and recover on their own, at home. (CNN anchor Chris Cuomo is an excellent  example, he's on TV reporting from his basement nearly every night, even with 103 fever. A different example is a curator I follow on Twitter who apparently went through a horrific illness at home, alone, in quarantine in a Manhattan apartment,  and is still in quarantine, and is so bitter about his experience that all he tweets is bitter anger and vitriol at those spreading the virus. Mentally, he clearly cannot get over what happened to him.)</p> <p>One question there is no answer to yet is: do those people, especially those with even milder cases than my two examples, produce a sufficient number of antibodies in sufficient strength to protect them against re-infection? This is where antibody testing admittedly falls very short for the patient. No guarantees, not enough knowledge yet. No real guarantees that the person cannot still be a spreader, either.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:34:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 280795 at http://dagblog.com By "sick" I meant infected. http://dagblog.com/comment/280794#comment-280794 <a id="comment-280794"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280792#comment-280792">Or not sick yet, but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>By "sick" I meant infected. So I think my 3 scenarios cover. Except if recovery/immunity is or isn't possible.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:33:54 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 280794 at http://dagblog.com If you reach 60% http://dagblog.com/comment/280793#comment-280793 <a id="comment-280793"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280692#comment-280692">Mass inoculating may be a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If you reach 60% effectiveness, AND EVERYONE GETS THE VACCINE, you have herd immunity.  That means that even if someone gets sick, his/her cohorts will likely not get it and life goes on.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:54:02 +0000 CVille Dem comment 280793 at http://dagblog.com Or not sick yet, but http://dagblog.com/comment/280792#comment-280792 <a id="comment-280792"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280791#comment-280791">Uh, either you&#039;re sick but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Or not sick yet, but detectable. Or not sick yet and undetectable today.  Or not sick at all AND detectable.  <br />  </p> <p>The possibilities are almost endless!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:50:33 +0000 CVille Dem comment 280792 at http://dagblog.com Uh, either you're sick but http://dagblog.com/comment/280791#comment-280791 <a id="comment-280791"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280790#comment-280790">Indeed no individual should</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Uh, either you're sick but detectable, sick but not detectable, or not sick.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:33:43 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 280791 at http://dagblog.com Indeed no individual should http://dagblog.com/comment/280790#comment-280790 <a id="comment-280790"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280789#comment-280789">I heard about it--there&#039;s a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Indeed no individual should be desiring it.More like they should be forced to, it should be required and paid for by gummint.</p> <p>But that test is not going to help an individual in the very least.</p> <p> Either you're sick or you're not, and if you are sick you just have to hope your symptoms are treatable. All they can do is treat symptoms. What diff does it make to the patient? The difference is that you'll be treated in quarantine hell ward if you get real sick and test positive. While regular uninfected stroke and pneumonia etc. patients would be elsewhere.</p> <p>I think the free study is for people who have <em>already </em>been tested positive for antibodies? That they want samples of their antibodies to study.</p> <p>Why wouldn't you want to know if you already had antibodies? Much less anxiety knowing that. There's still a chance to catch it, but far far lessened. Relief from paranoia.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:39:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 280790 at http://dagblog.com I heard about it--there's a http://dagblog.com/comment/280789#comment-280789 <a id="comment-280789"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280787#comment-280787">Found a review. It&#039;s a full</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I heard about it--there's a free study from the NIH soliciting people also.</p> <p> </p> <p>I think the more iimportant test is the one you don't want to want...</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:22:30 +0000 jollyroger comment 280789 at http://dagblog.com Found a review. It's a full http://dagblog.com/comment/280787#comment-280787 <a id="comment-280787"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280786#comment-280786">I registered. This &quot;Quest</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Found a review. It's a full blood draw test, and Quest is using two systems: the Abbott machines and the EuroImmun/Perkin/Elmer system. What I didn't know, thought they were just in this area, they have <em>2,200 patient service centers.. around the U.S. </em>$119 to know whether you have the antibodies while avoiding the begging your busy doctor problem! You can show to your doctor later. Heck if you get positive for antibodies, you can show to the police officer who is harassing you.</p> <p><a href="https://www.massdevice.com/quest-diagnostics-launches-patient-ordered-covid-19-antibody-test/">https://www.massdevice.com/quest-diagnostics-launches-patient-ordered-covid-19-antibody-test/</a></p> <p>Maybe insurer would even reimburse part if you submit the bill!</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:50:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 280787 at http://dagblog.com I registered. This "Quest http://dagblog.com/comment/280786#comment-280786 <a id="comment-280786"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/280783#comment-280783">holy shit, just alerted to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I registered. This "Quest Direct" tests paid for by patient use the exact same facilities as all the doctors do, there is no difference </p> <p>About half their NYC offices seem to be open, with reduced hours. Lots in Westchester,too. Their past rules were they prefer you make an appt. but walk ins were always okay too (Common practice now: Dr. writes script, tells you to go get test, so that he doesn't have to employ aides to draw blood and label and have picked up by Quest.) I would think because of coronavirus, they wouldn't like walk-ins anymore in order to stagger people in waiting room.</p> <p>So yeah in NYC area now, it's possible to get an antibody test from a good medical lab for $119. (Other tests available without prescription now, too! Finally!!!!!) What I don't know is the quality of this one.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:41:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 280786 at http://dagblog.com