dagblog - Comments for "Francis Fukuyama: COVID-19 Is Threatening Global Democracy And Peace"

No major disagreement.

rmrd0000 — Mon, 04 May 2020 20:15:36 +0000

No major disagreement.

In terms of the idea of

moat — Mon, 04 May 2020 20:11:58 +0000

In reply to From Fukuyama in the article

In terms of the idea of recognition Fukuyama develops in The End of History, people find a way to differentiate themselves through groups. In so far as the Trumpsters self identify themselves as such a group struggling to defeat other groups, this example is consistent with his definition.

As I have said for the last ten years when Fukuyama has been brought up, the defect in his idea of a group is that it does not reflect people who have "groupiness" thrust upon them. From that perspective, his view is too narrow, not overly inclusive.

From Fukuyama in the article

rmrd0000 — Mon, 04 May 2020 02:31:36 +0000

In reply to But you use it a lot.

From Fukuyama in the article

But the problem is that our political alignments have become cultural sources of identity. And so, for people who like Donald Trump, downplaying the epidemic and showing that you’re not scared of the virus has become the mark that you are part of this team, you are part of a tribe that doesn’t believe in the seriousness of the disease.

Everything is a tribe according to him.

Now we are told that we need to understand history and culture to fully understand a people. Tribe is a throw away term.

But you use it a lot.

moat — Mon, 04 May 2020 01:18:43 +0000

In reply to I don't thinks tribes is a

But you use it a lot.

I don't thinks tribes is a

rmrd0000 — Mon, 04 May 2020 00:46:08 +0000

In reply to I would differ. I think we

I don't thinks tribes is a useful term.

If the term is not useful

moat — Mon, 04 May 2020 00:30:56 +0000

In reply to I would differ. I think we

If the term is not useful then why provide a definition of it?

EDIT:

I don't ask that as a rhetorical or debating style question but as one who notices how the term gets used for vastly different points of view.

I would differ. I think we

rmrd0000 — Mon, 04 May 2020 00:19:12 +0000

In reply to I object to Fukuyama's point

I would differ. I think we form tribes with people who share similar ideals.

There has to be another term for those willing to rush a building armed with assault weapons, and willing to infect others to preserve what they call their " freedom ". Cult, perhaps?

The term tribe lumps together too much to be useful.

I object to Fukuyama's point

moat — Mon, 04 May 2020 00:07:40 +0000

In reply to “Many people in the West

I object to Fukuyama's point of view for many reasons but I think he understands "tribes" per se.

But the problem is that our political alignments have become cultural sources of identity. And so, for people who like Donald Trump, downplaying the epidemic and showing that you’re not scared of the virus has become the mark that you are part of this team, you are part of a tribe that doesn’t believe in the seriousness of the disease. And even if it’s not rational, it’s not based on any kind of scientific evidence, this desire to be part of the team is so strong that it overwhelms people’s reason. We’ve seen cases of things like this before, but unfortunately it’s happening right now in the middle of an epidemic.

“Many people in the West

rmrd0000 — Sun, 03 May 2020 23:31:11 +0000

In reply to Francis Fukuyama: COVID-19 Is Threatening Global Democracy And Peace

“Many people in the West really don’t understand Chinese history and the deep cultural traditions that exist in China.”

-Fukuyama

To understand the world, you need to understand the"tribes".