dagblog - Comments for "McCord slams Barr on misrepresented Flynn testimony" http://dagblog.com/link/mccord-slams-barr-misrepresented-flynn-testimony-31205 Comments for "McCord slams Barr on misrepresented Flynn testimony" en But the Sally Yates 302 the http://dagblog.com/comment/281344#comment-281344 <a id="comment-281344"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mccord-slams-barr-misrepresented-flynn-testimony-31205">McCord slams Barr on misrepresented Flynn testimony</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">But the Sally Yates 302 the frothy right thinks helps Flynn has a significantly redacted section describing how the convos were not like what was (and still is) represented in public. Flynn made specific asks (some of which are still redacted) and there was back and forth. <a href="https://t.co/YO29NUoewY">pic.twitter.com/YO29NUoewY</a></p> — emptywheel (@emptywheel) <a href="https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1259806618230951937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 May 2020 11:23:24 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281344 at http://dagblog.com