dagblog - Comments for "Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden" http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249 Comments for "Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden" en The fuller context on Tara http://dagblog.com/comment/282486#comment-282486 <a id="comment-282486"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The fuller context on Tara Reade’s flirtation with Russian nationalism is pretty <a href="https://t.co/PiwGy3SOnu">https://t.co/PiwGy3SOnu</a> <a href="https://t.co/3nKMZiSSui">pic.twitter.com/3nKMZiSSui</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1267256291879198720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 01 Jun 2020 05:31:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 282486 at http://dagblog.com "If Democrats want to beat http://dagblog.com/comment/281597#comment-281597 <a id="comment-281597"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"If Democrats want to beat Trump, they should take money from everyone — even Louis C.K."</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Very excited for my first <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@washingtonpost</a> byline! Thank you <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/yanggang?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#yanggang</a> for making all things possible<br /><br /> Believe it or not, the original version of this was even sassier...<a href="https://t.co/PF6WN5EtlM">https://t.co/PF6WN5EtlM</a></p> — Carly Reilly (@carlypreilly) <a href="https://twitter.com/carlypreilly/status/1261379157608599552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2020 19:56:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 281597 at http://dagblog.com PBS did a deep dive and found http://dagblog.com/comment/281595#comment-281595 <a id="comment-281595"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>PBS did a deep dive and found nothing</p> <p><a href="https://progresspond.com/2020/05/15/pbs-finds-no-support-for-tara-reades-accusations/">https://progresspond.com/2020/05/15/pbs-finds-no-support-for-tara-reades-accusations/</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2020 19:15:57 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281595 at http://dagblog.com #TaraReade accused a man of http://dagblog.com/comment/281594#comment-281594 <a id="comment-281594"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TaraReade?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TaraReade</a> accused a man of abusive behavior, then came back with a new version of the story in which her allegations became drastically more lurid and extreme.<br /> The man wasn't Joe Biden; it was her ex-husband. See my new story at <a href="https://twitter.com/Quillette?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Quillette</a> <a href="https://t.co/wpgYPzCY3K">https://t.co/wpgYPzCY3K</a></p> — Cathy Young (@CathyYoung63) <a href="https://twitter.com/CathyYoung63/status/1261069573220073474?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2020 19:10:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 281594 at http://dagblog.com The @USATODAY did a story on http://dagblog.com/comment/281560#comment-281560 <a id="comment-281560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The <a href="https://twitter.com/USATODAY?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@USATODAY</a> did a story on the inconsistencies in the allegations. <a href="https://t.co/BPT1wdZ558">https://t.co/BPT1wdZ558</a></p> — Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) <a href="https://twitter.com/Alyssa_Milano/status/1256262780555952130?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2020 03:59:55 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281560 at http://dagblog.com Part of the calculation may http://dagblog.com/comment/281552#comment-281552 <a id="comment-281552"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Part of the calculation may be that the Republicans have made it clear that assaulting women does not inhibit the ability to be elected President or selected for the Supreme Court.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2020 02:32:03 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281552 at http://dagblog.com Asked what he'd say to women http://dagblog.com/comment/281551#comment-281551 <a id="comment-281551"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-some-democrats-may-be-willing-look-past-allegation-against-biden-31249">Why Some Democrats May Be Willing To Look Past The Allegation Against Biden</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Asked what he'd say to women who believe Tara Reade and are now struggling with their vote, Biden says: "If they believe Tara Reade, they probably shouldn't vote for me. I wouldn’t vote for me if I believed Tara Reade."</p> — Mike Memoli (@mikememoli) <a href="https://twitter.com/mikememoli/status/1261119770059046914?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2020 02:22:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 281551 at http://dagblog.com