dagblog - Comments for "Stacey Abrams’s Trumpian problem" http://dagblog.com/link/stacey-abrams-s-trumpian-problem-31281 Comments for "Stacey Abrams’s Trumpian problem" en Yeah not even in Georgia, http://dagblog.com/comment/282122#comment-282122 <a id="comment-282122"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stacey-abrams-s-trumpian-problem-31281">Stacey Abrams’s Trumpian problem</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Yeah not even in Georgia, generally she was on the right wing of the D caucus <a href="https://t.co/3ZE6A2ZeVf">https://t.co/3ZE6A2ZeVf</a></p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1265730095240679429?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 27 May 2020 19:42:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 282122 at http://dagblog.com Or an embarrassing disaster. http://dagblog.com/comment/281785#comment-281785 <a id="comment-281785"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/281781#comment-281781">From the NYT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Or an embarrassing disaster.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 19 May 2020 20:57:15 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 281785 at http://dagblog.com From the NYT http://dagblog.com/comment/281781#comment-281781 <a id="comment-281781"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stacey-abrams-s-trumpian-problem-31281">Stacey Abrams’s Trumpian problem</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From the NYT</p> <blockquote> <p>WASHINGTON — Politics has always abided by certain unwritten rules. Not all of them make sense.</p> <p>One timely example: the rule stating that people who want to be picked as a presidential nominee’s running mate must never appear to be openly campaigning for the job — even though he or she plainly wants it (probably very badly).</p> <p>If, traditionally, prospective vice presidents were asked whether they would like to be so-and-so’s running mate, they would typically follow some variation on the familiar dodge. They would say how flattered and humbled they were to be mentioned before claiming that they were not really thinking about getting selected, not at all, not one bit.</p> <p>In other words, they must be reluctant. Or at least act reluctant.</p> <p>But that custom is fading in this strange lockdown of a veepstakes season. Prospective running mates appear more and more to be shedding their fake reluctance — or not bothering to shroud their ambition in faux nonchalance.</p> <p>You can call this progress, a win for the notion of saying what you want and advocating yourself. Credit <u>Stacey Abrams</u> as a trailblazer.</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/19/us/politics/biden-vice-president-trump.html?action=click&amp;module=Top%20Stories&amp;pgtype=Homepage">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/19/us/politics/biden-vice-president-trump.html?action=click&amp;module=Top%20Stories&amp;pgtype=Homepage</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 19 May 2020 20:13:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281781 at http://dagblog.com The AJC poll was conducted http://dagblog.com/comment/281697#comment-281697 <a id="comment-281697"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stacey-abrams-s-trumpian-problem-31281">Stacey Abrams’s Trumpian problem</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The AJC poll was conducted last year. A recent progressive think tank poll of almost 5000 people suggests that Biden-Abrams would beat Trump-Pence.</p> <p><a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/poll-stacey-abrams-is-bidens-best-running-mate-choice.html">https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/poll-stacey-abrams-is-bidens-best-running-mate-choice.html</a></p> <p>I wouldn't count out Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren. Bakari Sellars is pulling for Harris.</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/10/kamala-harris-early-biden-vice-president-favorite-248615">https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/10/kamala-harris-early-biden-vice-president-favorite-248615</a></p> <p>Warren made no secret that she would accept a VP offer.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 18 May 2020 02:05:48 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 281697 at http://dagblog.com