dagblog - Comments for "Evaluating 2009: What The Dems Did Wrong, Part 1 - &quot;It&#039;s Very Stimulating&quot;" http://dagblog.com/politics/evaluating-2009-what-dems-did-wrong-part-1-its-very-stimulating-3138 Comments for "Evaluating 2009: What The Dems Did Wrong, Part 1 - "It's Very Stimulating"" en You're right, it's just a http://dagblog.com/comment/10521#comment-10521 <a id="comment-10521"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10502#comment-10502">Very good post, DF. I do</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You're right, it's just a subtler argument that requires an understanding of the multiplier.  And, if you do understand the multiplier, it's a very odd thing indeed that right-wingers argue 1.) against fiscal measures and 2.) for tax cuts as stimulus.  It's an argument that makes absolutely no sense on a fundamental level.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:59:43 +0000 DF comment 10521 at http://dagblog.com Very good post, DF. I do http://dagblog.com/comment/10502#comment-10502 <a id="comment-10502"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/evaluating-2009-what-dems-did-wrong-part-1-its-very-stimulating-3138">Evaluating 2009: What The Dems Did Wrong, Part 1 - &quot;It&#039;s Very Stimulating&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Very good post, DF. I do think one ommission was that not only was the stimulus less than many believed it should be, it was also packed with tax cuts. The same tax cuts that the GOP will fight to death to say are the only thing ever necessary to stimulate the economy.</p> <p>If unemployment ticks downward more as the elections come near, look for that to be a major talking point for Republicans - without us, you'd have never gotten those tax cuts, and they were the only part of the stimulus package that stimulated anything.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:08:33 +0000 William K. Wolfrum comment 10502 at http://dagblog.com Reminds me of this post on http://dagblog.com/comment/10498#comment-10498 <a id="comment-10498"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10497#comment-10497">It signaled to the GOP that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Reminds me of <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/01/relieved.php?ref=fpblg">this post</a> on TPM from last month.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:17:16 +0000 DF comment 10498 at http://dagblog.com It signaled to the GOP that http://dagblog.com/comment/10497#comment-10497 <a id="comment-10497"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/evaluating-2009-what-dems-did-wrong-part-1-its-very-stimulating-3138">Evaluating 2009: What The Dems Did Wrong, Part 1 - &quot;It&#039;s Very Stimulating&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>It signaled to the GOP that Democrats were all too willing to negotiate from a position of weakness.</p> </blockquote> <p>True that. I just spoke to a friend of mine who is married to a political appointee in the administration. My friend described a very low morale among the White House and Congressional staff. They were all waiting for health care to move off their plates. Now it's just sitting their like a big rancid meatball that no one will touch, and worse, there's a sense among the staff that nothing ambitious has a chance any more.</p> <p>Great post. I look forward to the rest.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:07:35 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 10497 at http://dagblog.com