dagblog - Comments for "The President Versus the Mods" http://dagblog.com/link/president-versus-mods-31410 Comments for "The President Versus the Mods" en SAD! —Trump is desperate to http://dagblog.com/comment/282399#comment-282399 <a id="comment-282399"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/president-versus-mods-31410">The President Versus the Mods</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/05/why-donald-trumps-war-on-big-tech-is-doomed-to-fail/"><em>SAD! —</em>Trump is desperate to punish Big Tech but has no good way to do it</a></p> <p><em>Trump's executive order shows how little power the president has over Silicon Valley.</em></p> <p>By TIMOTHY B. LEE AND KATE COX @ ArsTechinca.com- 5/29/2020, 7:55 AM</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 31 May 2020 01:32:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 282399 at http://dagblog.com Wow. @therickwilson at his http://dagblog.com/comment/282317#comment-282317 <a id="comment-282317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/president-versus-mods-31410">The President Versus the Mods</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Wow. <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@therickwilson</a> at his best. Cough up the $35 for an annual subscription to the Beast. Worth it in spades. <a href="https://t.co/t2JnnEeCuG">https://t.co/t2JnnEeCuG</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/thedailybeast?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@thedailybeast</a></p> — Coffee Me (@RealScottSharp) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealScottSharp/status/1266576190275534853?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>could at least read the first 3 graphs w/o subscription</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 May 2020 03:46:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 282317 at http://dagblog.com Here's what employees are http://dagblog.com/comment/282306#comment-282306 <a id="comment-282306"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/president-versus-mods-31410">The President Versus the Mods</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Here's what employees are saying inside Facebook today about the company's decision not to take action against Trump's threatening posts: "History will not judge us kindly."<a href="https://t.co/vXVwULz8T3">https://t.co/vXVwULz8T3</a> <a href="https://t.co/xU9SyrS448">pic.twitter.com/xU9SyrS448</a></p> — Casey Newton (@CaseyNewton) <a href="https://twitter.com/CaseyNewton/status/1266473587801653250?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 30 May 2020 01:45:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 282306 at http://dagblog.com Pretty sure all-hands don't http://dagblog.com/comment/282283#comment-282283 <a id="comment-282283"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/282280#comment-282280">NYTimes cybersecurity</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pretty sure all-hands don't have a "no like" option" either. Maybe a frowny smiley?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:54:41 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 282283 at http://dagblog.com I used to have the job of http://dagblog.com/comment/282282#comment-282282 <a id="comment-282282"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/282281#comment-282281">Maybe your new career in new</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I used to have the job of taking out the bags of dissected lab cats - better at this than you imagine. </p> <p>[in a just world, this comment would win the internet for the day, but hélas...]</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:49:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 282282 at http://dagblog.com Maybe your new career in new http://dagblog.com/comment/282281#comment-282281 <a id="comment-282281"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/282278#comment-282278">Ahem, and the fine superfine</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe your new career in new world could be herding cats!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:45:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 282281 at http://dagblog.com NYTimes cybersecurity http://dagblog.com/comment/282280#comment-282280 <a id="comment-282280"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/president-versus-mods-31410">The President Versus the Mods</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NYTimes cybersecurity reporter:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Huh. Just had my third conversation in two days with an employee at FB who admires the position Twitter has taken, and is disappointed in Zuckerberg's response. Wonder if this will come up at the all-hands meeting today.</p> — Sheera Frenkel (@sheeraf) <a href="https://twitter.com/sheeraf/status/1266410806175883264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:43:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 282280 at http://dagblog.com Ahem, and the fine superfine http://dagblog.com/comment/282278#comment-282278 <a id="comment-282278"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/282277#comment-282277">Brings to mind even something</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ahem, and the <em>fine</em> <em>superfine</em> moderation at Ye Ole Daggeblogge. [saved ya the trouble - knew it was on the tip of your lippes]</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:34:31 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 282278 at http://dagblog.com Brings to mind even something http://dagblog.com/comment/282277#comment-282277 <a id="comment-282277"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/282256#comment-282256">Sometimes, the mods quelled</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brings to mind even something family members of differing views have mentioned to me: the New York Times itself does a superb job moderating comments on articles! It's easy to find bitchin from all sides about who they hire for op-eds and how they handle them, but you rarely see anything about how reader comments are handled except marveling at how they differ in quality from like, Facebook comments.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:30:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 282277 at http://dagblog.com Sometimes, the mods quelled http://dagblog.com/comment/282256#comment-282256 <a id="comment-282256"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/president-versus-mods-31410">The President Versus the Mods</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Sometimes, the mods quelled the fight or struck a compromise, and brought the board back into harmony. Other times, the angry users broke off and started their own forum, or the board simply became so intolerable that everyone left.</em></p> <p>There's big big money involved this time, tho. A lot on the line. So I am most curious to watch how The Twitter proceeds. There is evidence that the way they have nonsensically moderated up to this point (seen enough examples myself, people cut off for really silly reasons) doesn't bode well. But now hopefully more than minimum wage moderating types have been engaged to handle the problem. We'll see.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 29 May 2020 18:46:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 282256 at http://dagblog.com