dagblog - Comments for "John Bolton plans to publish a tell-all about time in White House in late June" http://dagblog.com/link/john-bolton-plans-publish-tell-all-about-time-white-house-late-june-31533 Comments for "John Bolton plans to publish a tell-all about time in White House in late June" en Traitor? https://t.co http://dagblog.com/comment/283637#comment-283637 <a id="comment-283637"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/john-bolton-plans-publish-tell-all-about-time-white-house-late-june-31533">John Bolton plans to publish a tell-all about time in White House in late June</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Traitor? <a href="https://t.co/bE5dI58IIh">https://t.co/bE5dI58IIh</a></p> — Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) <a href="https://twitter.com/waltshaub/status/1273792569160470528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Jun 2020 01:36:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 283637 at http://dagblog.com Bolton book passages of http://dagblog.com/comment/283636#comment-283636 <a id="comment-283636"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/john-bolton-plans-publish-tell-all-about-time-white-house-late-june-31533">John Bolton plans to publish a tell-all about time in White House in late June</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Bolton book passages of interest—an idiosyncratic thread.<br /><br /> (1) p. 6 <a href="https://t.co/0eLTEKjknH">pic.twitter.com/0eLTEKjknH</a></p> — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) <a href="https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1273676325291790337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="und" xml:lang="und">(2) p. 45 <a href="https://t.co/7mIn2WkKPw">pic.twitter.com/7mIn2WkKPw</a></p> — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) <a href="https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1273719576715542530?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">(3) For those who think the Trump admin leak problem is principally about deep state folks or Obama holdovers, p. 45: <a href="https://t.co/SUWM76QWig">pic.twitter.com/SUWM76QWig</a></p> — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) <a href="https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1273720463714385923?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">(4) Meow!!!! p. 55 <a href="https://t.co/qwkX4HHUMN">pic.twitter.com/qwkX4HHUMN</a></p> — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) <a href="https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1273788500685570048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Whoa, p. 57 <a href="https://t.co/ssUObQlrxz">pic.twitter.com/ssUObQlrxz</a></p> — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) <a href="https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1273790505210580993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Jun 2020 01:32:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 283636 at http://dagblog.com Nonny, you never complained http://dagblog.com/comment/283598#comment-283598 <a id="comment-283598"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283585#comment-283585">Bolton may avoid prosecution</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nonny, you never complained about Ivanka doing gov biz on a private email server before having any official role, even calling an actual gov employee her "chief of staff" while getting trademark favors out of China a few day before meeting with Xi. You're not a hypocrite, are you?</p> <p><a href="https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5eeaceddc5b67b92ff2d260c">https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5eeaceddc5b67b92ff2d260c</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:18:24 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 283598 at http://dagblog.com Speaking of slush funds, http://dagblog.com/comment/283587#comment-283587 <a id="comment-283587"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283585#comment-283585">Bolton may avoid prosecution</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Speaking of slush funds, Supreme Court should rule this month on Trump taxes. Can see maybe what other hookers He wrote off his taxes. Bother you that Javanka pulled in $82 million riding daddy's coattails pretending to help the US taxpayer? Bother you that Mnuchin refuses to reveal where a half trillion corporate aid went? Of courses not - youre just a Russian-cheering shill fucktard enjoyung the destruction of US gov while "owning the libs". Get stuffed </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:59:57 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 283587 at http://dagblog.com Bolton may avoid prosecution http://dagblog.com/comment/283585#comment-283585 <a id="comment-283585"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283563#comment-283563">Mutable Joe says:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bolton may avoid prosecution if this tome is released in the fiction/fantasy section. otherwise all that Globalist slush-fund money he gor to create it will go to lawyers and fines.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:28:51 +0000 Anonymous comment 283585 at http://dagblog.com You gotta learn from the best http://dagblog.com/comment/283576#comment-283576 <a id="comment-283576"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283575#comment-283575">Which gets kind of Trumpy as</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You gotta learn from the best.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:21:31 +0000 barefooted comment 283576 at http://dagblog.com Which gets kind of Trumpy as http://dagblog.com/comment/283575#comment-283575 <a id="comment-283575"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283574#comment-283574">Short version:  Bolton is,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Which gets kind of Trumpy as a branding thing.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:17:07 +0000 moat comment 283575 at http://dagblog.com Short version:  Bolton is, http://dagblog.com/comment/283574#comment-283574 <a id="comment-283574"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283573#comment-283573">In view of the recent</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Short version:  Bolton is, and always has been, about Bolton.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:07:26 +0000 barefooted comment 283574 at http://dagblog.com In view of the recent http://dagblog.com/comment/283573#comment-283573 <a id="comment-283573"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/282906#comment-282906">He&#039;s not really Trumpian.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In view of the recent developments, there is an element of calculation upon Bolton's part that doesn't square with the iconoclastic mythos of him standing up for his ideas no matter the consequence. <br /> He kept his mouth shut for the GOP during the impeachment trial.<br /> Is he still serving those interests by exposing Trump now?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Jun 2020 23:56:56 +0000 moat comment 283573 at http://dagblog.com Read what Burton Gerber told http://dagblog.com/comment/283566#comment-283566 <a id="comment-283566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/283559#comment-283559">.@MarthaRaddatz: “How would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Read what Burton Gerber told me about how Putin sees Trump: <a href="https://t.co/8FZblzV6CX">https://t.co/8FZblzV6CX</a> <a href="https://t.co/GK0xfWI1lM">https://t.co/GK0xfWI1lM</a></p> — Michael Weiss (@michaeldweiss) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/status/1273392533910032384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Jun 2020 23:03:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 283566 at http://dagblog.com