dagblog - Comments for "The Democratic battle to unseat Mitch McConnell in Kentucky is getting complicated" http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-battle-unseat-mitch-mcconnell-kentucky-getting-complicated-31620 Comments for "The Democratic battle to unseat Mitch McConnell in Kentucky is getting complicated" en Charles Booker, running http://dagblog.com/comment/283625#comment-283625 <a id="comment-283625"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-battle-unseat-mitch-mcconnell-kentucky-getting-complicated-31620">The Democratic battle to unseat Mitch McConnell in Kentucky is getting complicated</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Charles Booker, running against Amy McGrath, has a 100% rating from Americans for Prosperity, the Koch-funded libertarian group in the state. I think this may be one where the left wingers are kind of projecting their views onto him. <a href="https://t.co/aR2aNoZvZf">https://t.co/aR2aNoZvZf</a></p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1273747665684172801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">More progressive than Amy McGrath, probably, going to be a left-wing Senator, also probably not given the state's general political climate.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1273747789491699712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 18 Jun 2020 22:36:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 283625 at http://dagblog.com