dagblog - Comments for "John McWhorter: &quot;The Dictionary Definition of Racism Has to Change&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/john-mcwhorter-dictionary-definition-racism-has-change-31668 Comments for "John McWhorter: "The Dictionary Definition of Racism Has to Change"" en McWhorter http://dagblog.com/comment/284039#comment-284039 <a id="comment-284039"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/284028#comment-284028">I am guessing Prof. McWhorter</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>McWhorter</p> <blockquote> <p>If I had it my way—which I won’t—we would allow that <em>racism</em> now refers to a societal state, and revive <em>prejudice</em> to refer to attitudinal bias.</p> </blockquote> <p>Read the entire sentence. Do you see prejudiced as an attitude making a return? We will talking about people and society as racist. I gave myself an A+.</p> <p>McWhoter again</p> <blockquote> <p>But in my idealized English, people would be prejudiced while a society would exhibit racism.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:18:08 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 284039 at http://dagblog.com I am guessing Prof. McWhorter http://dagblog.com/comment/284028#comment-284028 <a id="comment-284028"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/284024#comment-284024">McWhorter realizes that he is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am guessing Prof. McWhorter, Linguistics/Comparative Lit, Columbia University might perhaps give you a D+ for interpreting the quoted text that way.  He's the opposite of "out of step" here!  He's specifically separating out how he would like to see the word used optimally, <em>from the actual way the word is being used in general discourse</em>. He's putting on his linguistics professor hat and saying: this is the way the word is being used. In step totally. He's saying the dictionaries are what's out of step.</p> <p>You're clearly approaching the text with a closed mind, reading your own thoughts into it, as you see him as a political enemy. He's not doing politics here, he's doing linguistics. The desire is to make people communicate more accurately.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 26 Jun 2020 01:43:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 284028 at http://dagblog.com McWhorter realizes that he is http://dagblog.com/comment/284024#comment-284024 <a id="comment-284024"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/john-mcwhorter-dictionary-definition-racism-has-change-31668">John McWhorter: &quot;The Dictionary Definition of Racism Has to Change&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>McWhorter realizes that he is out of step.</p> <blockquote> <p>If I had it my way—<strong>which I won’t</strong>—we would allow that <em>racism</em> now refers to a societal state, and revive <em>prejudice</em> to refer to attitudinal bias. <em>Prejudiced</em> was once, after all, the word of choice for racist bias. <em>Racist</em> only took over starting in about 1970, with a major uptick after 1980. Here is Sammy Davis Jr. taunting Archie Bunker on <em>All in the Family</em> in 1972. Note that his usage of <em>prejudiced</em> is now antique; the word would be <em>racist</em> today:</p> <p><strong><em>If you were prejudiced, you’d go around saying you were better than anyone else in the world, but I can honestly say, after spending these marvelous moments with you, you ain’t better than anybody!</em></strong></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 26 Jun 2020 01:15:35 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 284024 at http://dagblog.com continuation of Zilani's http://dagblog.com/comment/284012#comment-284012 <a id="comment-284012"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/john-mcwhorter-dictionary-definition-racism-has-change-31668">John McWhorter: &quot;The Dictionary Definition of Racism Has to Change&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>continuation of Zilani's comments related to McWhorter's article:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">National Spelling Bee could be considered extremely racist, despite it being 100 percent based on a process that can't discriminate by skin color.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1276302478645047297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Overall, the word racism doesn't have very much meaning these days, more precise words like discrimination, bias, prejudice, and disparities seem to convey more information as it is. Also, many types of related bias that don't neatly fit into racism around.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1276303082113191938?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">That being said at a certain point McWhorter is right. If a word starts being used in a different way across society the dictionary has to keep up. I still think most normies do not think have a definition of racism so vast that everything is racist, but if they ever did...</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1276303828871241728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:58:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 284012 at http://dagblog.com