dagblog - Comments for "Why Do Liberals Hate Beauty Queens?" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/why-do-liberals-hate-beauty-queens-3167 Comments for "Why Do Liberals Hate Beauty Queens?" en Being a tech-head, I'm really http://dagblog.com/comment/10832#comment-10832 <a id="comment-10832"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10830#comment-10830">When someone who&#039;s into gay</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Being a tech-head, I'm really ignorant about <a target="_blank" title="That's what they call it" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_theory">Queer Theory</a>, so I'm really just going on my ignorant observations, but I think the dichotomy between heterosexuals and homosexuals is not just an invention. I.e., I think there are real, genetic differences (although I don't want to oversimplify it, either) between heterosexual and homosexual males. (I know next to nothing about women, and even less about homosexual women.) Of course, Foucault was fighting against the idea that there's something deviant (i.e., "wrong") with homosexuals, not just that they're different. Also, he died in the '80s before a lot of the recent genetic discoveries were made. I do know that there are a lot of homosexuals who don't care for his theories, either, as they can be easily misconstrued to support the idea that homosexuality can be "cured" (although Foucault himself would never suggest such a thing, of course).</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:08:41 +0000 Nebton comment 10832 at http://dagblog.com When someone who's into gay http://dagblog.com/comment/10830#comment-10830 <a id="comment-10830"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10824#comment-10824">Michel Foucault would suggest</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When someone who's into gay bondage says that <i>even he</i> isn't entirely gay, I think that's kind of hard to discount.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:15:00 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 10830 at http://dagblog.com Michel Foucault would suggest http://dagblog.com/comment/10824#comment-10824 <a id="comment-10824"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10769#comment-10769">Am I missing something</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a target="_blank" title="No, not the pendulum guy…" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault">Michel Foucault</a> would suggest that no one is really, thoroughly gay. He would suggest that the homosexual versus heterosexual dichotomy is an invention of the modern era.</p> <p>Of course, he was into leather and S&amp;M, so take that with a grain of salt…</p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:10:54 +0000 Nebton comment 10824 at http://dagblog.com great point, canuck. btw, not http://dagblog.com/comment/10822#comment-10822 <a id="comment-10822"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10769#comment-10769">Am I missing something</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>great point, canuck. btw, not too mention, a total free pass for lesbians. god rocks!</p></div></div></div> Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:04:58 +0000 Deadman comment 10822 at http://dagblog.com Am I missing something http://dagblog.com/comment/10769#comment-10769 <a id="comment-10769"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/why-do-liberals-hate-beauty-queens-3167">Why Do Liberals Hate Beauty Queens?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Am I missing something here?</p> <blockquote> <p>If man lies with mankind as he would lie with a woman ...</p> </blockquote> <p>If you're really, thoroughly gay, you would NOT lie with a woman under any circumstances, right? So you've got a free pass, Bible-wise.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:59:20 +0000 acanuck comment 10769 at http://dagblog.com Gee, when you put it that http://dagblog.com/comment/10761#comment-10761 <a id="comment-10761"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10760#comment-10760">I think it&#039;s truly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gee, when you put it that way, it seems so obvious.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:30:33 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 10761 at http://dagblog.com I think it's truly http://dagblog.com/comment/10760#comment-10760 <a id="comment-10760"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/why-do-liberals-hate-beauty-queens-3167">Why Do Liberals Hate Beauty Queens?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think it's truly unbelievable that you are literally comparing someone tragically losing their life to Sarah Palin's failing career. You can recover from brutal comments, you can't recover from someone brutally killing you.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:04:16 +0000 Anonymous comment 10760 at http://dagblog.com In a way, I have some measure http://dagblog.com/comment/10756#comment-10756 <a id="comment-10756"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/why-do-liberals-hate-beauty-queens-3167">Why Do Liberals Hate Beauty Queens?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In a way, I have some measure of respect for the people who are making some kind of effort to actually read and live by the book that they blaim to be so into.  The "buffet style" Christians are way less fun.  Now if only we had more bull burning and stoning going on, then we'd have some real fun on our hands.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:10:08 +0000 DF comment 10756 at http://dagblog.com That's fair. http://dagblog.com/comment/10751#comment-10751 <a id="comment-10751"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10750#comment-10750">That line is grounds for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's fair.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:46:41 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 10751 at http://dagblog.com That line is grounds for http://dagblog.com/comment/10750#comment-10750 <a id="comment-10750"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/10748#comment-10748">(Now I&#039;m thinking of cheesy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That line is grounds for permanent banning from dagblog. You're on probation now, so watch it..</p></div></div></div> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:17:55 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 10750 at http://dagblog.com