dagblog - Comments for "Getting Lucky" http://dagblog.com/link/getting-lucky-31928 Comments for "Getting Lucky" en Even more, it's this kind of http://dagblog.com/comment/285890#comment-285890 <a id="comment-285890"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/285889#comment-285889">Nice piece. After seeing the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Even more, it's this kind of journalistic story that humanizes all the different sides.  And there are at least a hundred or so of them.</p> <p>It also gives a glimmer to the "defund police" dullness ... rather than a totally misunderstood idea put forward in perhaps the clumsiest way possible, it provides an example of how money can be perhaps better spent within the force. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jul 2020 00:32:18 +0000 barefooted comment 285890 at http://dagblog.com Nice piece. After seeing the http://dagblog.com/comment/285889#comment-285889 <a id="comment-285889"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/getting-lucky-31928">Getting Lucky</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice piece. After seeing the reaction to the George Floyd video, where we get a worldwide phenomenon of recognition of examples reported before, only because their own eyes can see it.--this is obviously the kind of journalism that's needed to continue with the polity being informed on what they really want out of police reform--up close and personal human interest, as opposed to the theoretical, the dry policy and stats. Even "just the facts,, ma'am" Jack Webb style doesn't seem to work for a lot of people. It's got to be like a novel.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jul 2020 00:20:35 +0000 artappraiser comment 285889 at http://dagblog.com