http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-again-rejects-church-challenge-virus-restriction-31930 Comments for "Supreme Court again rejects church challenge to virus restriction" en http://dagblog.com/comment/285918#comment-285918 <a id="comment-285918"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-again-rejects-church-challenge-virus-restriction-31930">Supreme Court again rejects church challenge to virus restriction</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>the public health agency as the totalitarian bureaucracy thing:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The dilemmas of the pandemic—public-health measures that are meant to save lives, but might end up blighting them—have a "Catch-22" feel <a href="https://t.co/1dM0AD9vyj">https://t.co/1dM0AD9vyj</a></p> — The Economist (@EconCulture) <a href="https://twitter.com/EconCulture/status/1286868482139791361?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:31:39 +0000 artappraiser comment 285918 at http://dagblog.com