dagblog - Comments for "&quot;If You Care About the Court, Don’t Talk About It&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/if-you-care-about-court-don-t-talk-about-it-32469 Comments for ""If You Care About the Court, Don’t Talk About It"" en .@jonathanvswan from March http://dagblog.com/comment/289674#comment-289674 <a id="comment-289674"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/289512#comment-289512">Libertarians over at Reason</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">.<a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jonathanvswan</a> from March 2019:<br /><br /> Scoop: Trump "saving" Judge Amy Barrett for Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat <a href="https://t.co/l32YKnqbC1">https://t.co/l32YKnqbC1</a></p> — Dan Primack (@danprimack) <a href="https://twitter.com/danprimack/status/1309624189075292161?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:52:54 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 289674 at http://dagblog.com apparently nobody thought it http://dagblog.com/comment/289673#comment-289673 <a id="comment-289673"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/289512#comment-289512">Libertarians over at Reason</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">apparently nobody thought it might be a good idea to secure her domain name <a href="https://t.co/zXJar4GoUC">https://t.co/zXJar4GoUC</a></p> — Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1309655667943276545?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:21:15 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 289673 at http://dagblog.com Libertarians over at Reason http://dagblog.com/comment/289512#comment-289512 <a id="comment-289512"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-you-care-about-court-don-t-talk-about-it-32469">&quot;If You Care About the Court, Don’t Talk About It&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Libertarians over at Reason aren't listening to arta and Applebaum, they looked into one of the favorites and they like the way she looks on cops and immunity:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This case is an encouraging sign that Amy Coney Barrett — reportedly the leading contender to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court — is not the sort of judge who bends over backward to shield cops from liability for outrageous misconduct.<a href="https://t.co/aHDUarWLoI">https://t.co/aHDUarWLoI</a></p> — reason (@reason) <a href="https://twitter.com/reason/status/1308931910459162625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:48:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 289512 at http://dagblog.com Nate Silver: http://dagblog.com/comment/289444#comment-289444 <a id="comment-289444"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-you-care-about-court-don-t-talk-about-it-32469">&quot;If You Care About the Court, Don’t Talk About It&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nate Silver:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Yeah, it's pretty clear that Republicans are trying to bait Democrats into a fight over Barrett/Lagoa's personal qualities, because a fight over Roe and the ACA being repealed likely ends badly for them. <a href="https://t.co/0XxvtatAWn">https://t.co/0XxvtatAWn</a></p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1308443446730985477?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Are Democrats likely to take that bait?<br /><br /> I mean ... maybe. They are likely to feel very ... impassioned.<br /><br /> There's sort of the blue-checkmark-crew-that-likes-to-post-videos-of-Trump-awkwardly-walking-down-the-staircase that might bite a bit.<br /><br /> But it's pretty obvious bait.</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1308444638265724933?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 22 Sep 2020 22:39:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 289444 at http://dagblog.com Someone has renamed the 50th http://dagblog.com/comment/289393#comment-289393 <a id="comment-289393"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/289377#comment-289377">money quote:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Someone has renamed the 50th Street C Train station in Manhattan. The 50th street mosaic panel now reads "RUth St." in honor of late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RBG?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RBG</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ruthst?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ruthst</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NYC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NYC</a> <a href="https://t.co/cKkOFboczp">pic.twitter.com/cKkOFboczp</a></p> — Eyewitness News (@ABC7NY) <a href="https://twitter.com/ABC7NY/status/1307715043220430853?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 21 Sep 2020 05:14:56 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 289393 at http://dagblog.com money quote: http://dagblog.com/comment/289377#comment-289377 <a id="comment-289377"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-you-care-about-court-don-t-talk-about-it-32469">&quot;If You Care About the Court, Don’t Talk About It&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>money quote:</p> <blockquote> <p>Why? Fixating on the Court organizes the electorate along two fronts of a culture war, and forces people to make stark ideological choices. Instead of focusing voters on the president’s failure to control COVID-19 or the consequent economic collapse, the culture war makes voters think only of their deepest tribal identities</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 21 Sep 2020 01:35:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 289377 at http://dagblog.com