dagblog - Comments for "Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/whites-woke-gaming-ballot-boxes-1865-32694 Comments for "Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865" en Nothing like a federal http://dagblog.com/comment/291913#comment-291913 <a id="comment-291913"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/whites-woke-gaming-ballot-boxes-1865-32694">Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Nothing like a federal appeals court—five days before an election—holding that Minnesota voters who have been told that they only have to *send* their mail-in ballots by Election Day may actually need them to be *received* by then:<a href="https://t.co/j0zSehm6mY">https://t.co/j0zSehm6mY</a><br /><br /> Judge Kelly dissents: <a href="https://t.co/fVO6mayRlH">pic.twitter.com/fVO6mayRlH</a></p> — Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) <a href="https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1321955771576393728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:09:19 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 291913 at http://dagblog.com A clearer way to state it, http://dagblog.com/comment/291577#comment-291577 <a id="comment-291577"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/291574#comment-291574">Omar is part of the anti</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A clearer way to state it, after 1988, the Democrats won all 7 subsequent presidential elections, by popular vote, except one, 2004.</p> <p>Another point: the political power of Deep South white supremacists post-Civil War was expanded nationally. With Jim Crow, blacks still couldn't vote, but for allotting congressional representation,  blacks were now worth 5/5 not 3/5 of a person...!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Oct 2020 03:29:20 +0000 NCD comment 291577 at http://dagblog.com A rather anachronistic take http://dagblog.com/comment/291576#comment-291576 <a id="comment-291576"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/291574#comment-291574">Omar is part of the anti</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A rather anachronistic take in the electoral college.</p> <p>First, the cotton gin wasn't invented til 1793, quite after the 1787 Constitutional Convention, and indeed slave population decrease up to 1790, and the bigger cotton *territories* weren't even settled til after 1800. So it's unlikely the Founding Fathers in 1787 envisioned the cotton behemoth of 1850.</p> <p><a href="https://userpages.umbc.edu/~bouton/History407/SlaveStats.htm">https://userpages.umbc.edu/~bouton/History407/SlaveStats.htm</a></p> <p>Second, presidents were chosen by states, not voters - as were Senators til the 17th Amendment. So treating early voting as a way to disenfranchise specific voters ignores the whole context - there was no massive national GOTV effort - the whole system was much more representational, i.e. funneled thru representatives even in selection stage (and it's hard to imagine the practical logistics of a 13-colonies-long direct vote on election day back in pre-steam society.)</p> <p>Third, women couldn't vote either. They counted as 5/5th a person, true, but their male relatives had to do the deciding for them till 1919 or so, and women's property rights weren't even settled til 1960-1980 range. Why we turn a blind eye to gender Injustice in all these discussions, as if it's normal that the female half didn't vote now let's talk about blacks - is a bit bizarre but unsurprising in #MeToo era. (yes, a female black would be nonvoting 3/5, and a female white would be non-voting 5/5, and not sure if Cherokee and Choctaw counted at all, nor Chinese)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:32:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 291576 at http://dagblog.com Omar is part of the anti http://dagblog.com/comment/291574#comment-291574 <a id="comment-291574"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/whites-woke-gaming-ballot-boxes-1865-32694">Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Omar is pretty much part of the anti-wokee intellectual club, but he does know real racist history as well:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Electoral College<br /><br /> — Designed to increase power of slaveholding states via 3/5ths clause<br /><br /> — Winner take all rules created, in part, to deny equal voice to Black voters<br /><br /> — In 1970, segregationist Senators filibuster popular reform<br /><br /> Do I detect a pattern?<a href="https://t.co/Do77761wcd">https://t.co/Do77761wcd</a></p> — Omar Wasow (@owasow) <a href="https://twitter.com/owasow/status/1319412933093306368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:55:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 291574 at http://dagblog.com https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki http://dagblog.com/comment/291565#comment-291565 <a id="comment-291565"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/291562#comment-291562">Florida is the origin and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Man">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Man</a></p> <p><a href="https://filmdaily.co/news/florida-man-memes/">https://filmdaily.co/news/florida-man-memes/</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:15:48 +0000 artappraiser comment 291565 at http://dagblog.com Florida is the origin and http://dagblog.com/comment/291562#comment-291562 <a id="comment-291562"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/291558#comment-291558">2016 anti-voter effort (click</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Florida is the origin and national home base of every crook, idiot, shyster, fool, scam, right wing crackpot and experimental territory for GOP system gaming, I have no hope Biden will come out on top there, even if his vote total exceeds Trump.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:52:43 +0000 NCD comment 291562 at http://dagblog.com 2016 anti-voter effort (click http://dagblog.com/comment/291558#comment-291558 <a id="comment-291558"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/whites-woke-gaming-ballot-boxes-1865-32694">Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>2016 anti-voter effort (click for even more)<br /> Why was Manafort passing polling info to the Russians?<br /> Why were those servers passing data between Alfa Bank &amp; Trump &amp; elsewhere?<br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">They used the data to identify Black residents, especially on either side of I-95 in North Miami-Dade, who were unlikely to vote for Trump.<br /><br /> Their goal was not to win them over, but to deter them from voting for <a href="https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HillaryClinton</a>, using negative ads, some laden with misinformation. <a href="https://t.co/UnucnUt6We">pic.twitter.com/UnucnUt6We</a></p> — Miami Herald (@MiamiHerald) <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald/status/1319357334683082752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">In Florida, Trump’s team marked more Black voters for ‘deterrence’ than in any other state — roughly 658,000 people, or 40% of Black voters in the Trump database, according to exclusive data shared with the <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MiamiHerald</a> by the U.K.’s <a href="https://twitter.com/Channel4News?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Channel4News</a>. <a href="https://t.co/oXwF2iBklU">pic.twitter.com/oXwF2iBklU</a></p> — Miami Herald (@MiamiHerald) <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald/status/1319357637885087745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">It then used those profiles to individually target people with advertisements and door-to-door visits designed to dissuade them from voting.<br /><br /> Many of the ads were so-called “dark posts” on Facebook, designed to be seen by only small groups of voters and then disappear forever. <a href="https://t.co/OYjaA2U5Ao">pic.twitter.com/OYjaA2U5Ao</a></p> — Miami Herald (@MiamiHerald) <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald/status/1319358952870760449?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The end result: Trump carried the state of Florida by more than 100,000 votes, boosted by huge turnout in rural and suburban White areas of the state and fewer minorities showing up to the polls. <a href="https://t.co/fLHE8XosbM">pic.twitter.com/fLHE8XosbM</a></p> — Miami Herald (@MiamiHerald) <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald/status/1319359657027211265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Our analysis offers a window into how the Trump campaign undercut Clinton in 2016, and how it could do it again in 2020, as Democratic nominee <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeBiden?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@joebiden</a> relies heavily on robust Black voter turnout to win the nation’s largest battleground state. <a href="https://t.co/k3C7mSjzlz">https://t.co/k3C7mSjzlz</a></p> — Miami Herald (@MiamiHerald) <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald/status/1319359787403018241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:25:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 291558 at http://dagblog.com That cranks like Alito, http://dagblog.com/comment/291549#comment-291549 <a id="comment-291549"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/291546#comment-291546">Secret Supreme Court motions</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That cranks like Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch have some dictatorial omniscience on what is Constitutional is a huge impediment to progress, can set back necessary action/reforms decades or even centuries.</p> <p>All judges and all lawmakers in the nation take an oath to defend the Constitution, there is no monopoly on it especially with our ideologically regressive politicized courts. it's why the courts must be balanced ASAP, or we will be breathing smoky air, enduring increasing oligarchy and inequality, and treading water in rising seas for the next 50 years.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:03:33 +0000 NCD comment 291549 at http://dagblog.com Secret Supreme Court motions http://dagblog.com/comment/291546#comment-291546 <a id="comment-291546"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/whites-woke-gaming-ballot-boxes-1865-32694">Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Secret Supreme Court motions</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There's a lot that's wrong with <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SCOTUS</a>'s shadow docket. But perhaps nothing is more troubling than the fact that significant decisions affecting how we vote are handed down with literally *no* explanation — even when, as here, multiple Justices dissent:<a href="https://t.co/ReIPavzpOT">https://t.co/ReIPavzpOT</a> <a href="https://t.co/XtxJYTrBQ5">pic.twitter.com/XtxJYTrBQ5</a></p> — Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) <a href="https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1319073879864840193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:56:22 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 291546 at http://dagblog.com There's a lot that's wrong http://dagblog.com/comment/291544#comment-291544 <a id="comment-291544"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/whites-woke-gaming-ballot-boxes-1865-32694">Whites Woke to Gaming Ballot Boxes Since 1865</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There's a lot that's wrong with <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SCOTUS</a>'s shadow docket. But perhaps nothing is more troubling than the fact that significant decisions affecting how we vote are handed down with literally *no* explanation — even when, as here, multiple Justices dissent:<a href="https://t.co/ReIPavzpOT">https://t.co/ReIPavzpOT</a> <a href="https://t.co/XtxJYTrBQ5">pic.twitter.com/XtxJYTrBQ5</a></p> — Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) <a href="https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1319073879864840193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:55:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 291544 at http://dagblog.com