dagblog - Comments for "Effects of Large Group Meetings on the Spread of COVID-19: The Case of Trump Rallies" http://dagblog.com/link/effects-large-group-meetings-spread-covid-19-case-trump-rallies-32877 Comments for "Effects of Large Group Meetings on the Spread of COVID-19: The Case of Trump Rallies" en Excellent point that goes for http://dagblog.com/comment/292034#comment-292034 <a id="comment-292034"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/effects-large-group-meetings-spread-covid-19-case-trump-rallies-32877">Effects of Large Group Meetings on the Spread of COVID-19: The Case of Trump Rallies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Excellent point that goes for both rallies or protests or whatever you want to call them. That many people chose to stay home when they might have gone out, just because they know one is going on in their locality!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Two things being conflated on the question of whether rallies (right or left) can spread COVID. Yes these rallies are dangerous to go to, doesn't matter if you have a cloth mask on standing shoulder to shoulder. Two, the reason there is no large uptick from them is interesting.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1323007109261332481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The best study I've seen on rallies/COVID suggested the reason they didn't lead to a net increase in cases is because *so many people stayed home to avoid the rallies* <a href="https://t.co/VyjUg9cep4">https://t.co/VyjUg9cep4</a></p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1323007263481671683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">So these large protests you're seeing in the US, EU, other places do carry dangers. The fact that net number of cases hasn't gone up as a result does not mean the rallies themselves aren't a danger for people who attend them. That's not what the science shows.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1323008115743301646?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There is a lot of innumeracy in the way this stuff is reported in the media but the basic fact is standing very close to people who are yelling in dense environments, even outside, even with a mask on, still carries dangers and is still a risk.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1323008533638664194?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 01 Nov 2020 21:06:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 292034 at http://dagblog.com