dagblog - Comments for "The Distorting Prism of Social Media " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133 Comments for "The Distorting Prism of Social Media " en some address the echo chamber http://dagblog.com/comment/294666#comment-294666 <a id="comment-294666"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294665#comment-294665">Ok, after all that high</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>some address the echo chamber thing in comments later on the thread--there's no need to blame the software, grownups can chose not to have one</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:03:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 294666 at http://dagblog.com Ok, after all that high http://dagblog.com/comment/294665#comment-294665 <a id="comment-294665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133">The Distorting Prism of Social Media </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ok, after all that high faluting talk, here's the problem, though--it's wanting to hang with people that know how to be<em> SOCIAL:</em></p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I cannot emphasize enough how life-changing it is to just fully and unapologetically embrace the block and mute buttons on this thing.<br /><br /> Some ppl sign onto Twitter to share jokes and figure out interesting stuff together. Others are broken ppl and rage-mongers. Just block em!</p> — Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) <a href="https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/1333512278579302401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 30, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>It’s not even rude. It’s just a matter of pruning your online social life the exact same way that everybody naturally treats their offline networks.</p> <em>— Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) <a href="https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/1333513209450549250?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 30, 2020</a></em></blockquote> </div> <p>maybe the answer for those who do not like "bubbles" of dittoheading</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Yes.<br /><br /> It's also worth having an appeals process for the odd false positive though.</p> — Antonio García Martínez (@antoniogm) <a href="https://twitter.com/antoniogm/status/1333513220280131585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 30, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>for sure. that appeals process tends to elicit kindness and good faith! i make a point to accept 100% of the un-block requests i receive.</p> — Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) <a href="https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/1333513443492700161?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 30, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:59:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 294665 at http://dagblog.com "Can a country in which http://dagblog.com/comment/294661#comment-294661 <a id="comment-294661"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133">The Distorting Prism of Social Media </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">"Can a country in which people refuse to listen to one another’s perspectives continue to function as a democracy?" <a href="https://twitter.com/HankBissonnette?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HankBissonnette</a> on the importance of tolerating disagreement, popping media bubbles, &amp; building a common identity in <a href="https://twitter.com/AreoMagazine?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AreoMagazine</a> <a href="https://t.co/TJei0i6eFY">https://t.co/TJei0i6eFY</a></p> — Paul Kuhne (@pauljkuhne) <a href="https://twitter.com/pauljkuhne/status/1332379660940808193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:51:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 294661 at http://dagblog.com Another psych study I http://dagblog.com/comment/294594#comment-294594 <a id="comment-294594"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133">The Distorting Prism of Social Media </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Another psych study I reference which I haven't seen referenced before in context of social media effects is a 1967 Abelson one on how insults make people more likely to commit to their initial beliefs. <a href="https://t.co/l54bQKTAMh">pic.twitter.com/l54bQKTAMh</a></p> — Zachary Elwood (@apokerplayer) <a href="https://twitter.com/apokerplayer/status/1329088552831905793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 30 Nov 2020 07:48:13 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 294594 at http://dagblog.com Nate Silver on same: http://dagblog.com/comment/294273#comment-294273 <a id="comment-294273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294272#comment-294272">Echo chambers make for better</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nate Silver on same:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">One thing that's striking here is the extent to which Facebook is maximizing for short-term, measurable gains as opposed to long-term brand equity. A better news feed could result in more trust from readers, more partnerships with news organizations, higher internal morale, etc. <a href="https://t.co/4ettG93YVw">https://t.co/4ettG93YVw</a></p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1331261532068597765?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Publishers understand this, which is why they employ editors. If the NYT wanted to maximize traffic *next week*, they could publish lots of highly sensationalist or even conspiratorial stories about Trump, etc. But this would likely be very damaging to them in the long term.</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1331262559115239426?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There's also a degree of path-dependance. If Facebook has lost high-info readers because its news feed is too low-quality, the remaining customers might not like it if you changed things. But ideally you'd want to win the high-info readers back, which could take time to measure.</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1331264083509862402?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:52:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 294273 at http://dagblog.com Echo chambers make for better http://dagblog.com/comment/294272#comment-294272 <a id="comment-294272"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133">The Distorting Prism of Social Media </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Echo chambers make for better user engagement. <a href="https://t.co/XVeyeWVS56">https://t.co/XVeyeWVS56</a></p> — Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) <a href="https://twitter.com/FrankLuntz/status/1331264521529221120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:45:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 294272 at http://dagblog.com Funniest part of this tweet http://dagblog.com/comment/294240#comment-294240 <a id="comment-294240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133">The Distorting Prism of Social Media </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Funniest part of this tweet is that in the comments selected to assess toxicity they used "your antifa." Honestly I don't know if that was picked as an accurate spelling of a comment or if the people doing the study are also that stupid and didn't know the correct usage of your and you're.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:51:40 +0000 ocean-kat comment 294240 at http://dagblog.com Democracy is healing https:/ http://dagblog.com/comment/294237#comment-294237 <a id="comment-294237"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/distorting-prism-social-media-33133">The Distorting Prism of Social Media </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Democracy is healing <a href="https://t.co/EIf8ds0Hg4">https://t.co/EIf8ds0Hg4</a></p> — Robert L. Tsai (@robertltsai) <a href="https://twitter.com/robertltsai/status/1331048134596816897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:26:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 294237 at http://dagblog.com