dagblog - Comments for "What We Know About How White and Latino Americans Voted In 2020" http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-know-about-how-white-and-latino-americans-voted-2020-33153 Comments for "What We Know About How White and Latino Americans Voted In 2020" en Ah well, tx for reading so I http://dagblog.com/comment/294342#comment-294342 <a id="comment-294342"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294341#comment-294341">It&#039;s clear from looking at</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ah well, tx for reading so I didn't haff 2</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:11:02 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 294342 at http://dagblog.com It's clear from looking at http://dagblog.com/comment/294341#comment-294341 <a id="comment-294341"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294334#comment-294334">Michigan turnout thread </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's clear from looking at the thread that she does advocacy journalism for grassroots left purposes. No data. One story for each demographic group, interviews cherry picked for purposes of rah-rah, we can make a difference SPIN; P.R. Which is fine for what it is, but doesn't help analyze results. Zero real proof the people in her stories really represent their demographics.</p> <p>She actually straight out says what she's trying to do in the first tweet<em> It’s amazing how Michigan voters and democracy activists aren’t cast as the protagonists in their own story,</em> she's trying to<em> cast democracy activists as the protagonists in their own story.</em></p> <p>They are all have the same pitfalls and usefulness of like NYTimes' stories along the lines of "who are these rural Trump fans? let's talk to some of them and see if we can't try and figure them out." Except these are all selected for left activist perspective.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:03:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 294341 at http://dagblog.com Michigan turnout thread  http://dagblog.com/comment/294334#comment-294334 <a id="comment-294334"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-know-about-how-white-and-latino-americans-voted-2020-33153">What We Know About How White and Latino Americans Voted In 2020</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Michigan turnout thread </p> <p>(I'm blocked, so can't read it - hope it's good)</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Here's some important <a href="https://twitter.com/MichiganAdvance?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MichiganAdvance</a> reporting on Michigan voters and policies they want to see, starting with <a href="https://twitter.com/HistoryLivesDet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HistoryLivesDet</a>'s interviews with Black voters in Detroit. <a href="https://t.co/Xmnx7QyY0M">https://t.co/Xmnx7QyY0M</a></p> — Susan J. Demas (@sjdemas) <a href="https://twitter.com/sjdemas/status/1331569449728675843?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 25, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:45:15 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 294334 at http://dagblog.com Not just the professional and http://dagblog.com/comment/294327#comment-294327 <a id="comment-294327"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294303#comment-294303">The Democratic Party is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not just the professional and managerial class, but big corporations too, if Trumpism continues to have a stranglehold on the GOP? Just sayin, after I saw this tweet:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Corporate leaders foresee a more traditional, “no-nonsense” working relationship with the White House. And they urge the next administration to prioritize the Covid-19 pandemic. <a href="https://t.co/XyxuKPG6p8">https://t.co/XyxuKPG6p8</a></p> — The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) <a href="https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1325456817854570497?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 8, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>And thinking of that in turn reminds me of this recent news item, also WSJ:</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/charles-koch-says-his-partisanship-was-mistake-33024"><u>CHARLES KOCH SAYS HIS PARTISANSHIP WAS A MISTAKE</u></a></p> <p>By <a href="http://dagblog.com/users/artappraiser" title="View user profile.">artappraiser</a> on Fri, 11/13/2020 - 5:29pm</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:42:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 294327 at http://dagblog.com I have to admit, it was a http://dagblog.com/comment/294320#comment-294320 <a id="comment-294320"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294317#comment-294317">You can lead a horticulture..</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have to admit, it was in part a chicken shit post.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:38:44 +0000 ocean-kat comment 294320 at http://dagblog.com You can lead a horticulture.. http://dagblog.com/comment/294317#comment-294317 <a id="comment-294317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294307#comment-294307">Yeah I get it. It&#039;s like from</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You can lead a horticulture...</p> <p>Have to note I've never seen so much shit in one comment - 10lbs in a 5lb bag, as they say. Scat-o-logical even - you just might be Superman cuz in real life you're a mild manured man.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:24:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 294317 at http://dagblog.com Yeah I get it. It's like from http://dagblog.com/comment/294307#comment-294307 <a id="comment-294307"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294285#comment-294285">From my years doing political</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah I get it. It's like from my years doing organic gardening, I'd say it comes down to a bunch of shit, and what worked 4 some soils didn't work as much for other soils. Horse shit is better than cow shit. Chicken shit is better than horse shit. And bat shit has such a high concentration of nitrogen is almost the equivalent of a chemical fertilizer like ammonia nitrate. But if the soil is extremely low in organic matter shit isn't enough. Horse stable bedding with it's mixture of urine soaked straw and horse shit is really the best for that situation.</p> <p>I guess what I've learned if that while you have to do a bunch of shit to win an election sometimes you need more than just a bunch of shit.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 03:56:32 +0000 ocean-kat comment 294307 at http://dagblog.com The Democratic Party is http://dagblog.com/comment/294303#comment-294303 <a id="comment-294303"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-we-know-about-how-white-and-latino-americans-voted-2020-33153">What We Know About How White and Latino Americans Voted In 2020</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>The Democratic Party is rapidly becoming the Party of the professional-managerial class. <a href="https://t.co/mxm0bvuqxD">pic.twitter.com/mxm0bvuqxD</a></p> — Ben Winegard (@BenWinegard) <a href="https://twitter.com/BenWinegard/status/1331250331062300679?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">In 1980, the Democrats only won 9/100 of the highest income counties. In 2020, Biden won over fifty percent (57/43) of the highest income counties. Part of this, of course, was due to Trump's unique character flaws, but it is also part of a long-term Party reversal. <a href="https://t.co/BFYkUzCFan">pic.twitter.com/BFYkUzCFan</a></p> — Ben Winegard (@BenWinegard) <a href="https://twitter.com/BenWinegard/status/1331252039234576392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>A key take home: Culture matters. Voters are not income maximizers simply punching the ballot for the candidate who is most likely to improve their post-tax net worth. Rather, they are voting for candidates &amp; coalitions with whom they share broad cultural affinities.</p> — Ben Winegard (@BenWinegard) <a href="https://twitter.com/BenWinegard/status/1331253477457203201?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p>he got some interesting comments in replies</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:29:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 294303 at http://dagblog.com From my years doing political http://dagblog.com/comment/294285#comment-294285 <a id="comment-294285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294283#comment-294283">When we win people stand up</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From my years doing political analysis, I'd say it comes down to a bunch of people went out and did a bunch of shit, and what worked 4 years ago didn't work as much, and some of what didn't work last time worked this, and while some of it was some new stuff that people pulled, and while the nation is largely moving on, a good portion is looking back or staying put, but without doubt the most effective and gamechanging group effort has to go to... sorry, it's in my other notebook - be right back.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:22:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 294285 at http://dagblog.com When we win people stand up http://dagblog.com/comment/294283#comment-294283 <a id="comment-294283"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/294279#comment-294279">suggestion to cut the elite</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When we win people stand up to take credit. When we lose people look for someone to blame. I did a quick search to verify my guess. My guess based on basic knowledge of the country turned out to be true. Nevada has 200 thousand union members with a population of 2.8 million. Arizona has 100 thousand union members with a population of 7.2 million. The question I have is if latino organizers with union backgrounds are so good why did they succeed in Arizona but fail in Nevada? If using latinx is such a turn off to latinos how were the Arizona latino union influencers able to counteract that when the Nevada latino union influencers weren't?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:05:02 +0000 ocean-kat comment 294283 at http://dagblog.com