dagblog - Comments for "538 tweeted by Obama: &quot;The Police’s Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn’t An Aberration&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/538-police-s-tepid-response-capitol-breach-wasn-t-aberration-33546 Comments for "538 tweeted by Obama: "The Police’s Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn’t An Aberration"" en What does the Capitol police http://dagblog.com/comment/297483#comment-297483 <a id="comment-297483"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/538-police-s-tepid-response-capitol-breach-wasn-t-aberration-33546">538 tweeted by Obama: &quot;The Police’s Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn’t An Aberration&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">What does the Capitol police do? More traffic stops and low level drug war enforcement than you'd think <a href="https://t.co/vqEiM6zhel">https://t.co/vqEiM6zhel</a></p> — Conor Friedersdorf (@conor64) <a href="https://twitter.com/conor64/status/1348039762712530946?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:51:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 297483 at http://dagblog.com Maggie Haberman recommended http://dagblog.com/comment/297477#comment-297477 <a id="comment-297477"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/538-police-s-tepid-response-capitol-breach-wasn-t-aberration-33546">538 tweeted by Obama: &quot;The Police’s Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn’t An Aberration&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maggie Haberman recommended this one from the NBC congressional reporter by retweeting it:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">.⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/haleytalbotnbc?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@haleytalbotnbc</a>⁩’s account of what it was like inside the House chamber is absolutely chilling, as all of these stories have been. I’m in awe of her always but especially right now. Read her story &gt;&gt; <a href="https://t.co/qqfDC4JOpH">https://t.co/qqfDC4JOpH</a></p> — Ali Vitali (@alivitali) <a href="https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/1348033244642615296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:25:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 297477 at http://dagblog.com Mark Levitt @ JustSecurity http://dagblog.com/comment/297470#comment-297470 <a id="comment-297470"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/538-police-s-tepid-response-capitol-breach-wasn-t-aberration-33546">538 tweeted by Obama: &quot;The Police’s Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn’t An Aberration&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Mark Levitt @ JustSecurity.org, June 9: Tragedy at the Capitol:<a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/74121/tragedy-at-the-capitol-four-questions-that-demand-answers/"> Four Questions that Demand Answers</a></p> <blockquote> <p>[....[ In what follows, I highlight four initial questions to focus on:</p> <ul><li>Was the District of Columbia National Guard properly deployed and resourced?</li> <li>What prevented other state National Guards from being expeditiously deployed?</li> <li>What role do other federal law enforcement have and why did the DC police have to play such a critical role in the Capitol’s defense?</li> <li>What other assets may have assisted?</li> </ul><p>[....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 21:13:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 297470 at http://dagblog.com My opinion, Washington Post's http://dagblog.com/comment/297467#comment-297467 <a id="comment-297467"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/538-police-s-tepid-response-capitol-breach-wasn-t-aberration-33546">538 tweeted by Obama: &quot;The Police’s Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn’t An Aberration&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My opinion, Washington Post's  "what happened?" is the best on topic I have read so far:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/capitol-police/2021/01/07/fa3114b8-5114-11eb-83e3-322644d82356_story.html">How the U.S. Capitol Police were overrun in a ‘monumental’ security failure</a></p> <p>By <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/peter-hermann/">Peter Hermann</a>, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/carol-d-leonnig/">Carol D. Leonnig</a>, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/aaron-c-davis/">Aaron C. Davis</a> and <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-a-fahrenthold/">David A. Fahrenthold</a>. Maria Sacchetti, Devlin Barrett, Paul Sonne, Tom Jackman, Rachel Weiner, Ovetta Wiggins, Laura Vozzella, Michael Brice-Saddler, Dan Lamothe and Colby Itkowitz contributed to this report.</p> <p>Jan. 8, 2021 at 12:15 a.m. EST</p> </blockquote> <p>Doh! Why didn't I check the pros from Dover earlier? They've only been covering D.C. since 1877.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 21:06:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 297467 at http://dagblog.com I found the description http://dagblog.com/comment/297448#comment-297448 <a id="comment-297448"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/297446#comment-297446">Nope, with a couple other</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I found the description interesting, thanx. And better to be the butt of a joke than meet the butt of a gun. Even if the business end not a barrel of laughs.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 17:53:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 297448 at http://dagblog.com Nope, with a couple other http://dagblog.com/comment/297446#comment-297446 <a id="comment-297446"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/297442#comment-297442">Uhhh... Lulu...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nope, with a couple other things but never with either end of a carbine. But, if it came to a confrontation I would much rather someone swing a gun at me than shoot me with it.  My comment was just to say what I think the tactical situation was, not to make any judgment about it.  </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 17:14:29 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 297446 at http://dagblog.com The death shot of Ashli http://dagblog.com/comment/297401#comment-297401 <a id="comment-297401"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/297388#comment-297388">I&#039;d simply like to stress</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>The death shot of Ashli Babbitt </strong></em></p> <p> </p> <p>From that JaydenX video tha Paracles posted.</p> <div> </div> <div><a href="https://youtu.be/PfiS8MsfSF4?t=2103">https://youtu.be/PfiS8MsfSF4?t=2103</a></div> <div> </div> <p> </p> <p><img alt="" height="351" src="https://i.imgur.com/R8sYheE.png" width="473" /></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:46:04 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 297401 at http://dagblog.com Uhhh... Lulu... http://dagblog.com/comment/297442#comment-297442 <a id="comment-297442"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/297391#comment-297391">Those soldiers appear to have</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>Uhhh... </strong></em><strong>Lulu</strong><em><strong>...</strong></em></p> <p>You ever gotten whacked in the face<br /> with the butt or barrel of a carbine?</p> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:33:05 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 297442 at http://dagblog.com another reaction to the http://dagblog.com/comment/297406#comment-297406 <a id="comment-297406"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/297387#comment-297387">Maggie Haberman just tweeted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>another reaction to the crushed in the door video,  with 4,000 retweets, 14k likes (he has a ton of followers, best selling crime and mystery author, has been a strong anti-Trump voice)</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">If you watch the video they just played on <a href="https://twitter.com/CNN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CNN</a> of the officer being crushed in the door by the mob of domestic terrorists I promise you will never suggest "moving on"<br /><br /> This is so awful<br /><br /> We can't be this<br /><br /> We have prosecute every person responsible to the fullest extent of the law</p> — Don Winslow (@donwinslow) <a href="https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1347750082163036162?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 06:15:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 297406 at http://dagblog.com Those soldiers appear to have http://dagblog.com/comment/297391#comment-297391 <a id="comment-297391"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/297384#comment-297384">Anecdotal? 1960s... ~OGD~</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Those soldiers appear to have rifles loaded with blanks, for whatever that is worth if it is actually the case. Notice the cross shaped extensions on the rifle barrels. Those appear, though I cannot be sure, to be suppressors which insert into the barrel so as to offer enough resistance to the blanks gas because they have a smaller powder load than a standard bullet. This is to operate the automatic feed of the next round. A standard bullet cannot be fired with a blank suppressor in place. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 09 Jan 2021 04:45:37 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 297391 at http://dagblog.com