dagblog - Comments for "Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again." http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568 Comments for "Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again." en This is an enormous sea http://dagblog.com/comment/297842#comment-297842 <a id="comment-297842"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This is an enormous sea change in GOP approach to impeachment. Cheney could move a lot of votes - in the House and the Senate. <a href="https://t.co/7vrEh2mxie">https://t.co/7vrEh2mxie</a></p> — Eamon Javers (@EamonJavers) <a href="https://twitter.com/EamonJavers/status/1349129872610914313?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p><em>Eamon is a Washington Correspondent for CNBC covering the Trump White House. Economy + Politics = News. Leak to me: <a dir="ltr" href="https://t.co/9Ox3WvYP9R?amp=1" rel=" noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://cnbc.com/news-tips/</a></em></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:00:35 +0000 artappraiser comment 297842 at http://dagblog.com House GOP leaders are not http://dagblog.com/comment/297811#comment-297811 <a id="comment-297811"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">House GOP leaders are not whipping their colleagues to tell them to vote against the impeachment resolution tomorrow, per aides. They will let members vote their conscience, a marked departure from the approach in 2019 when GOP leaders pushed their members to fall in line</p> — Manu Raju (@mkraju) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1349012715734499337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:38:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 297811 at http://dagblog.com on Senators Angus King & http://dagblog.com/comment/297781#comment-297781 <a id="comment-297781"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>on Senators Angus King &amp; Susan Collins:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Collins — who hasn't publicly called on Trump to resign, hasn't publicly urged <a href="https://twitter.com/VP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@VP</a> &amp; cabinet to consider 25th Am., &amp; has declined to say where she stands on impeachment, citing her role as a juror — said clearly that Trump incited the rioters. <a href="https://t.co/ibsruKvECl">https://t.co/ibsruKvECl</a> <a href="https://t.co/Bapi7eUEPp">pic.twitter.com/Bapi7eUEPp</a></p> — Steven Porter (@reporterporter) <a href="https://twitter.com/reporterporter/status/1348723097071988736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Sen. Angus King also hasn't said where he stands on impeachment, but he has called on <a href="https://twitter.com/VP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@VP</a> and cabinet to consider Trump's removal via 25th Amendment. <a href="https://t.co/yrK6Csm9wJ">https://t.co/yrK6Csm9wJ</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/mepolitics?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#mepolitics</a></p> — Steven Porter (@reporterporter) <a href="https://twitter.com/reporterporter/status/1348723795989827590?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:55:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 297781 at http://dagblog.com Maggie Haberman retweeted http://dagblog.com/comment/297776#comment-297776 <a id="comment-297776"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maggie Haberman retweeted this including that GOP House is expecting 10-20 GOP members to vote for impeachment:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">NEWS — ☀️Punchbowl AM — ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/GOPLeader?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GOPLeader</a>⁩ and ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/Liz_Cheney?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Liz_Cheney</a>⁩ split on impeachment. McCarthy opposed. Cheney says it’s a vote of conscience.<br /><br /> Rs expecting 10-20 gop lawmakers to vote for impeachment. <a href="https://t.co/BCUdPX8qbO">https://t.co/BCUdPX8qbO</a> <a href="https://t.co/QcQuXCtCl4">pic.twitter.com/QcQuXCtCl4</a></p> — Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) <a href="https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1348961268003188738?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:07:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 297776 at http://dagblog.com Potential Criminal Charges in http://dagblog.com/comment/297774#comment-297774 <a id="comment-297774"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Potential Criminal Charges in D.C. Sends Signal That Trump and Allies ‘Can’t Pardon Their Way Out’; D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine (D) revealed his probe during recent interviews with Fox News and MSNBC</em></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">‘What Trump Knew’: Potential Criminal Charges in D.C. Sends Signal That Trump and Allies ‘Can’t Pardon Their Way Out’<a href="https://t.co/wABNGDHskW">https://t.co/wABNGDHskW</a></p> — Law &amp; Crime (@lawcrimenews) <a href="https://twitter.com/lawcrimenews/status/1348776213364559874?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:34:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 297774 at http://dagblog.com On Monday, non-partisan http://dagblog.com/comment/297773#comment-297773 <a id="comment-297773"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>On Monday, non-partisan government watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) penned an open letter to Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and FBI Director Christopher Wray styled as “criminal sedition complaint.”</p> </blockquote> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Watchdog Group Files ‘Criminal Sedition Complaint’ Against Trump: ‘This Cannot Go Unanswered’<a href="https://t.co/HeXaHFXPag">https://t.co/HeXaHFXPag</a></p> — Law &amp; Crime (@lawcrimenews) <a href="https://twitter.com/lawcrimenews/status/1348797761748140032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:30:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 297773 at http://dagblog.com Daniel Dale on myths gone http://dagblog.com/comment/297765#comment-297765 <a id="comment-297765"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/moral-imperative-or-dangerous-precedent-house-plans-impeach-trump-again-33568">Moral imperative or dangerous precedent? House plans to impeach Trump again.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Daniel Dale on myths gone viral about what impeachment would do:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">- Trump won't lose pension if impeached, only if removed by Senate<br /> - Unclear if he loses Secret Service even if removed<br /> - Even removal doesn't auto-ban him from a 2024 run<br /> - He prob doesn't get a big travel allowance anyway<br /><br /> Debunking a mega-viral tweet: <a href="https://t.co/n1biUeHKZJ">https://t.co/n1biUeHKZJ</a></p> — Daniel Dale (@ddale8) <a href="https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1348688712419463174?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:44:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 297765 at http://dagblog.com