http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-ends-emoluments-suits-against-trump-33688 Comments for "Supreme Court Ends Emoluments Suits Against Trump" en http://dagblog.com/comment/298882#comment-298882 <a id="comment-298882"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-ends-emoluments-suits-against-trump-33688">Supreme Court Ends Emoluments Suits Against Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump screws up pardons</p> <p>(as relates to emoluments, legal proceedings on emoluments may have stopped, but a Dominion-like billion dollar emoluments-violation damages suit could be worse for Trump)</p> <p>Also note despite Flynn's better pardon in November, he may have violated laws inciting insurrection since then.</p> <p>(I am a bit concerned about pardons inviting prosecutors to then charge other uncharged crimes, but sane future presidents will undoubtedly be more careful)</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Don't read anything about just-released pardon for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bannon?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Bannon</a> without reading this by <a href="https://twitter.com/AWeissmann_?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AWeissmann_</a>:<br /><br /> The text "clearly leaves—unpardoned—numerous potential federal charges."<br /><br /> "The decision about whether to charge these new counts is relatively easy."<a href="https://t.co/yDzQbFVx2k">https://t.co/yDzQbFVx2k</a></p> — Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) <a href="https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1353479076770689025?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:18:19 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 298882 at http://dagblog.com