dagblog - Comments for "Impeachment related news and analysis" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/impeachment-related-news-and-analysis-33693 Comments for "Impeachment related news and analysis" en Biden is trying to walk a http://dagblog.com/comment/300093#comment-300093 <a id="comment-300093"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/impeachment-related-news-and-analysis-33693">Impeachment related news and analysis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Biden is trying to walk a disciplined line regarding comments on the impeachment trial. The trial itself is helping keeping focus off Biden and on the Republicans' fracture, a boon to the White House. <a href="https://twitter.com/anniekarni?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@anniekarni</a> and me <a href="https://t.co/a3xEZkJXoW">https://t.co/a3xEZkJXoW</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1360043148676911105?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 12 Feb 2021 04:40:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 300093 at http://dagblog.com Wow. http://dagblog.com/comment/300041#comment-300041 <a id="comment-300041"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300003#comment-300003">very talented retired veteran</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Wow.<br /><br /> Orange dot = Mike Pence<br /><br /> Blue dot = Eugene Goodman<br /><br /> Red Dot = Mob<br /><br /> Hero. Full stop. <a href="https://t.co/hFgrXmVM5R">pic.twitter.com/hFgrXmVM5R</a></p> — Angry Staffer (@Angry_Staffer) <a href="https://twitter.com/Angry_Staffer/status/1359617629753913350?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:05:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 300041 at http://dagblog.com Twitter to uphold permanent http://dagblog.com/comment/300027#comment-300027 <a id="comment-300027"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299939#comment-299939">Good one:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Twitter to uphold permanent ban on Trump, even if running for office</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Twitter has the First Amendment right to prevent use of its platform to incite violence, and they have done the right thing here. No more <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RealDonaldTrump</a>.<a href="https://t.co/eHhjuwls80">https://t.co/eHhjuwls80</a></p> — Richard W. Painter (@RWPUSA) <a href="https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1359750006777995266?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:28:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 300027 at http://dagblog.com very talented retired veteran http://dagblog.com/comment/300003#comment-300003 <a id="comment-300003"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/impeachment-related-news-and-analysis-33693">Impeachment related news and analysis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>very talented retired veteran reporter of war and foreign civil unrest still worrying about "the troops":</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">i hope officer goodman is getting support from his command &amp; has readily available mental health care. he deserves the gratitude &amp; accolades. but this kind of public profile can be hard to bear; it can be disorienting, draining, damaging. here’s hoping someone has the man’s back.</p> — C.J. Chivers (@cjchivers) <a href="https://twitter.com/cjchivers/status/1359658937163874307?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:18:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 300003 at http://dagblog.com Interesting fine point on http://dagblog.com/comment/299958#comment-299958 <a id="comment-299958"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299956#comment-299956">Maybe can hire Pussy Riot to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting fine point on populist demagoguery I just ran across here, just reiterates for me why we have a Senate in the founders design, that's what they are there for, that's their main raison d'etre, to counteract when this happens, the House is for the rabble and they are supposed to be the elite grownups who keep it from spinning out of control when some of "the masses" go off the rails</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>One small data point I didn't include in my <a href="https://twitter.com/monthly?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@monthly</a> voting rights deep dive <a href="https://t.co/cwI96qDEje">https://t.co/cwI96qDEje</a><br /><br /> What's the greatest example of same-day registration upending an election?<br /><br /> Answer: Jesse Ventura's '98 MN Gov win<br /><br /> ...</p> — Bill Scher (@billscher) <a href="https://twitter.com/billscher/status/1359569108484972545?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>...the former wrestler won with a 37% plurality thanks to young wrestling fans taking advantage of same-day registration.<br /><br /> An estimated 70% of Ventura's vote came from same-day registrants <a href="https://t.co/LOz2IWyqAG">https://t.co/LOz2IWyqAG</a><br /><br /> ...</p> — Bill Scher (@billscher) <a href="https://twitter.com/billscher/status/1359570006439321609?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>...Ventura ran on a third-party ticket and was not easy to peg ideologically (radical centrist/anti-establishment is how I'd put it). But same-day registration allowed non-voters captivated by a charismatic figure to determine the outcome.<br /><br /> In other words...</p> — Bill Scher (@billscher) <a href="https://twitter.com/billscher/status/1359571172136992768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p>We don't have a "one man, one vote" simple democracy where demagogues can rule the day, we have a republic....</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/12/18/republic-if-you-can-keep-it-did-ben-franklin-really-say-impeachment-days-favorite-quote/">‘A republic, if you can keep it’: Did Ben Franklin really say Impeachment Day’s favorite quote?</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/12/18/republic-if-you-can-keep-it-did-ben-franklin-really-say-impeachment-days-favorite-quote/">Here’s the history behind the quote.</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:43:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 299958 at http://dagblog.com Maybe can hire Pussy Riot to http://dagblog.com/comment/299956#comment-299956 <a id="comment-299956"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299953#comment-299953">True, but this whole thing is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe can hire Pussy Riot to give seminars in being ballsy.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:20:07 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 299956 at http://dagblog.com powerful righteous men, not http://dagblog.com/comment/299954#comment-299954 <a id="comment-299954"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299953#comment-299953">True, but this whole thing is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>powerful righteous men, not meese:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Congress needs to make sure that no future President can ever abuse his or her vast powers to cling to the Presidency, even if he or she is turned out by American voters.</p> — Michael Beschloss (@BeschlossDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/BeschlossDC/status/1359565577409490948?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:16:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 299954 at http://dagblog.com True, but this whole thing is http://dagblog.com/comment/299953#comment-299953 <a id="comment-299953"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299950#comment-299950">I think the intimidation is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>True, but this whole thing is how you stop that! The founders gave them the same power that Jack Dorsey has. It's: are you a mouse or a man? You want to live like this for the rest of your career? There's 50 of you and one of him, for chrissakes. You want to live in a civilization or a jungle? <em>RULE OF LAW.</em>  Start sending the message: rule of law for everyone, "<em>lock em up"</em> if they don't agree.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:14:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 299953 at http://dagblog.com I think the intimidation is http://dagblog.com/comment/299950#comment-299950 <a id="comment-299950"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299946#comment-299946">P.S. Romney is such a good</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think the intimidation is physical - one of these nuts can come out anywhere, and it could get quite worse. It's kind of amazing it hasn't get 10-15,000 nuts together..</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:02:10 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 299950 at http://dagblog.com A few to many "theys" but http://dagblog.com/comment/299948#comment-299948 <a id="comment-299948"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299945#comment-299945">Yes, but, the tweet really</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A few to many "theys" but assume you mean the GOP mostly. But I don't think they want to punish anything. Any behavior by Repubs is fine as long as it's owning or shocking the libs. There's simply not a lot of principle left - i guess passing certain legislation or appointing more judges, but does that really get them across the River Jordan, and is that a real goal, or simply a well-worn prop they don't take theologically/literally? I mean, do they really think Jesus is pro-2nd Amendment and Reagan would be happy with Trump deficit/debt?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:59:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 299948 at http://dagblog.com