dagblog - Comments for "Shell-shocked &amp; angry: Inside the Capitol Police force a month after the attack" http://dagblog.com/link/shell-shocked-and-angry-inside-capitol-police-force-month-after-deadly-attack-33752 Comments for "Shell-shocked & angry: Inside the Capitol Police force a month after the attack" en Letter from wife on http://dagblog.com/comment/299623#comment-299623 <a id="comment-299623"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299611#comment-299611">1 month after Capitol riot,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Letter from wife on infections (TMZ)</p> <p><a href="https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/31/capitol-police-wives-officers-testing-postive-covid-19-chief-yogananda-pittman/">https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/31/capitol-police-wives-officers-testing-pos...</a></p> <p>Split between union &amp; others on timing of no-confidence vote vs memorials et al</p> <p><a href="https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/03/politics/capitol-police-turmoil-no-confidence-leadership/index.html">https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/03/politics/capitol-police-turmoil-no-co...</a></p> <p>A few days ago a complaint that new chief Pitmann greatly exaggerated the # of police actually working/in area &amp; mobilized that day.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 06 Feb 2021 02:02:25 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 299623 at http://dagblog.com 1 month after Capitol riot, http://dagblog.com/comment/299611#comment-299611 <a id="comment-299611"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/shell-shocked-and-angry-inside-capitol-police-force-month-after-deadly-attack-33752">Shell-shocked &amp; angry: Inside the Capitol Police force a month after the attack</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">1 month after Capitol riot, not a single press conference from <a href="https://twitter.com/CapitolPolice?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CapitolPolice</a>. New chief just released 7 min video. She says attack “forever changed” dept, they’ve reinstated critical emergency training &amp; will be making significant changes to operations <a href="https://t.co/BD4K8z6TNw">https://t.co/BD4K8z6TNw</a></p> — Lindsay Watts (@LindsayAWatts) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindsayAWatts/status/1357809739946721286?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 05 Feb 2021 22:25:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 299611 at http://dagblog.com I am not solving all of my http://dagblog.com/comment/299528#comment-299528 <a id="comment-299528"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299513#comment-299513">Non-sequiturs &amp; bland</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am not solving all of my problems so I won't get uppity about other people. But I think the following can't hurt as a set of guidelines:</p> <p>Challenge statements as you see fit. Observe what is not addressed from your point of view. Ignore what has no bearing upon the matter as you understand it if it doesn't challenge your observations or interest you. If something is dead, don't pour your blood in the cup to hear more about it.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 21:06:54 +0000 moat comment 299528 at http://dagblog.com thank you, moat http://dagblog.com/comment/299522#comment-299522 <a id="comment-299522"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299519#comment-299519">What is to be gained by such</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thank you, moat</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 20:22:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 299522 at http://dagblog.com What is to be gained by such http://dagblog.com/comment/299519#comment-299519 <a id="comment-299519"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299517#comment-299517">PP... did you know...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What is to be gained by such a remark? It seems self serving.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 20:17:03 +0000 moat comment 299519 at http://dagblog.com PP... did you know... http://dagblog.com/comment/299517#comment-299517 <a id="comment-299517"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299513#comment-299513">Non-sequiturs &amp; bland</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>PP... <em>did you know...</em></strong></p> <blockquote> <p><em>"If you asked for time off because you're going through something, they give you time off as long as you don't say buzzwords like 'depression' and stuff like that, you can keep your gun." </em><a href="https://twitter.com/PeterNickeas/status/1357113413634306048">Link at Twitter</a></p> </blockquote> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:05:10 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 299517 at http://dagblog.com Non-sequiturs & bland http://dagblog.com/comment/299513#comment-299513 <a id="comment-299513"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299512#comment-299512">What makes it a taunt is the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Non-sequiturs &amp; bland repetition also weaken strength of discourse, as do weakly supported conspiracy theories.<br /> Got a solution?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:45:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 299513 at http://dagblog.com What makes it a taunt is the http://dagblog.com/comment/299512#comment-299512 <a id="comment-299512"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299511#comment-299511">That was &quot;describing&quot;, not </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What makes it a taunt is the personal contempt that is expressed. It weakens the strength of his discourse when he does it. It weakens the strength of your discourse when you do it. The mutuality of it is cloying to those outside of the party. It reminds me of being stuck in a subway car that has stalled between stations while a family starts yelling at each other.</p> <p>When any of us do it, it turns a topic immediately into a meta-discussion like the one I have initiated here. I can only imagine how boring that must be for people outside of the group. It bores me even though I stick around. Shame on me, as the expression goes.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:05:10 +0000 moat comment 299512 at http://dagblog.com He is entertaining  http://dagblog.com/comment/299510#comment-299510 <a id="comment-299510"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299509#comment-299509">Taunting not helpful?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>He is entertaining </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:44:27 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 299510 at http://dagblog.com That was "describing", not http://dagblog.com/comment/299511#comment-299511 <a id="comment-299511"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/299508#comment-299508">Taunting people is not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That was "describing", not "taunting". Note, however out of context the name "Chauvin" is to whatever rmrd wants to say, he'll go off, and the next thing you know it's a 20-line pedantic haiku invoking whatever race-dotted thing he wants as filler. He's the resident race-scold, the race expert has spoken (btw, you know he works with some kids on racial equality issues that trumps any opinion that you or i would every have, out there in the "real wrorld"), always ready to pull his shtick. There's no new ground to break - he's not interested in discussion, he's interested in drudgery, a thick tar dragging whatever down into the miasma. That makes his day.<br /> But if you want to call it "taunting", fine. Just after so many years the act is rather tiring. And speaking of "taunting", since OGD showed back up, that's his shtick - rmrd's sidekick to taunt especially AA, sometime me. But whatevs - we survived Wattree &amp; Hal, we'll survive this.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:07:31 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 299511 at http://dagblog.com