dagblog - Comments for "Latest Impeachment Trial" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/latest-impeachment-trial-33798 Comments for "Latest Impeachment Trial" en Section 3 of the 14th http://dagblog.com/comment/301548#comment-301548 <a id="comment-301548"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/latest-impeachment-trial-33798">Latest Impeachment Trial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Section 3 of the 14th Amendment would allow Congress to hold Trump accountable for inciting the Jan 6 insurrection. Read our a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer calling on Congress to invoke Section 3. <a href="https://t.co/Y7IQyDDZNI">https://t.co/Y7IQyDDZNI</a></p> — Protect Democracy (@protctdemocracy) <a href="https://twitter.com/protctdemocracy/status/1366883300128743428?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>just retweeted by<a href="https://twitter.com/waltshaub"> Walter Shaub</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 02 Mar 2021 23:23:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 301548 at http://dagblog.com Trump intimidation of GA SoS http://dagblog.com/comment/301094#comment-301094 <a id="comment-301094"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/latest-impeachment-trial-33798">Latest Impeachment Trial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump intimidation of GA SoS investigated</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The man who would have handled that prosecution was US Attorney BJay Pak, who suddenly and mysteriously resigned two days after the Raffensperger call became public. The Justice Department inspector general is investigating Pak's odd departure. 2/4</p> — Jay Bookman (@jaysbookman) <a href="https://twitter.com/jaysbookman/status/1364307315768365060?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">But if Trump sought a criminal probe of Raffensperger as a way to scare the SoS to "find 11,780 votes," if he abused his office that way and forced Pak out, that's a hard thing for a prosecutor to just walk away from and forget. IF that happened, prosecution is justified. 4/4</p> — Jay Bookman (@jaysbookman) <a href="https://twitter.com/jaysbookman/status/1364307318494683139?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I wish more would also focus on his admission during the call that they had an alternative (the insurrection) that they we’re planning as a last result. It seems like it shows Trump knew the plan for Jan 6 and was contemplating Flynn’s “declare Marshal Law” idea</p> — tybin until all the bots are gone (@4tybin) <a href="https://twitter.com/4tybin/status/1364313587963949058?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:16:28 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 301094 at http://dagblog.com Trump's lawsuits & http://dagblog.com/comment/300997#comment-300997 <a id="comment-300997"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300996#comment-300996">Supremes sing: Trump taxes!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump's lawsuits &amp; investigations</p> <p><a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/18/politics/donald-trump-tax-returns-finances/index.html">https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/18/politics/donald-trump-tax-returns-fin...</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:06:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300997 at http://dagblog.com Supremes sing: Trump taxes! http://dagblog.com/comment/300996#comment-300996 <a id="comment-300996"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/latest-impeachment-trial-33798">Latest Impeachment Trial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Supremes sing: Trump taxes!</p> <p>(immediately)</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">JUST IN: Former President Trump is dealt a massive loss as the Supreme Court clears the way for a New York prosecutor to obtain his tax returns <a href="https://t.co/FKVoBtd3F9">https://t.co/FKVoBtd3F9</a></p> — CNN (@CNN) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1363864404731781123?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 22, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:21:51 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300996 at http://dagblog.com Maybe if we INDICT this guy http://dagblog.com/comment/300857#comment-300857 <a id="comment-300857"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300783#comment-300783">Hatch Act holdovers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Maybe if we INDICT this guy we can fire him. <a href="https://t.co/523uJzeGu6">https://t.co/523uJzeGu6</a></p> — emptywheel (@emptywheel) <a href="https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1363159013765111817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:49:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300857 at http://dagblog.com Hatch Act holdovers http://dagblog.com/comment/300783#comment-300783 <a id="comment-300783"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/latest-impeachment-trial-33798">Latest Impeachment Trial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hatch Act holdovers</p> <p>(how many investigations were closed up; how many still hanging around, and what to do?)</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/18/trump-hatch-act-sands-biden-470037">https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/18/trump-hatch-act-sands-biden-470037</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Feb 2021 06:06:43 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300783 at http://dagblog.com The trial of Aaron Burr for http://dagblog.com/comment/300450#comment-300450 <a id="comment-300450"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/latest-impeachment-trial-33798">Latest Impeachment Trial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The trial of Aaron Burr for treason demonstrates that Trump's Insurrection qualifies as treason.<br /> Here's why:<br /><br /> a. In 1806, Burr recruited current &amp; former US army and govt officials to engage in a scheme to seize all land west of the Allegheny and form a new nation.<br /><br /> 1/</p> — Monty Lincoln's Speeches Boa (@MontyBoa99) <a href="https://twitter.com/MontyBoa99/status/1361368665581637633?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 15, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:29:11 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300450 at http://dagblog.com As Ry Cooder sang: "Romance http://dagblog.com/comment/300385#comment-300385 <a id="comment-300385"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300383#comment-300383">ALSO TOO super important,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As Ry Cooder sang: "Romance without finance is a nuisance."</p> <p>In regards to appealing to large businesses, there is also a great concern to preserve smaller businesses that the GOP has promised they would support but carjacked immediately afterwards with big franchise moves. Agricultural communities really felt the burn of the vague Trade Deals. They don't like any of their options right now. They aren't taking any more IOUs from nobody.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 14 Feb 2021 23:24:37 +0000 moat comment 300385 at http://dagblog.com ALSO TOO super important, http://dagblog.com/comment/300383#comment-300383 <a id="comment-300383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300379#comment-300379">Yes, the central struggle</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ALSO TOO super important, your comments about Mitch coming out anti-Gingrich gave me the reminder of the phenomenon: </p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/business-leaders-urge-congress-certify-biden-win-33504">BUSINESS LEADERS URGE CONGRESS TO CERTIFY BIDEN WIN</a></p> <p>I tried to keep it all on one thread for a reason, it went on and on, day after day. Big donor money out the door for anyone supporting Trump challenges. Virtually 90% of the country's big businesses came out anti-Trump insurrectionism. After Jan. 6 probably made it 100%, all with dug-in-heels. (My Pillow is left out there alone, I think even Goya-oh boya-may have deserted him after Jan. 6?) Big corps want populist insurrectionism like a whole in the head.</p> <p>State and local GOP might think twice about supporting Trumpism after a visit or two to the big local employers in the area with hat in hand. SORRY NO MONEY FOR YOU AS LONG AS YOU CONTINUE TO FLOG THAT MEME.</p> <p>(As to wooing new large businesses to your area if you support Trump insurrectionism instead of rule of law: FUGGEDABOUTIT. No way, it's the antithesis of the meme, you want to get out of the locales that have no rule of law, don't need more disputed elections, insurrections, coups and quasi-coups been there done that in Latin America...)</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 14 Feb 2021 22:47:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 300383 at http://dagblog.com Yes, the central struggle http://dagblog.com/comment/300379#comment-300379 <a id="comment-300379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300372#comment-300372">there is hope for Biden if</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, the central struggle will be in state and local offices plus party apparatuses that are pumping out censures right now. While that puts immediate pressure upon the untrumps, it also broadcasts to any who would like a different caucus to get busy for the next go around. The Mitch Mantra for decades has been that the GOP can afford to appeal to the crazy because the Big Boys will be calling the shots regarding taxes and finance. That cost benefit analysis has just received new input. The Gingrich Gang take over of the party is being challenged for the first time since it began. Doesn't mean the challenge will work, of course.</p> <p>Apart from the question of who is invested in the brand, the last four years did not produce the change that made so many enthusiastic in 2015/2016. He is going to be in court soon. His money stream will not improve unless he demonstrates more situational awareness than he has for the last year. He went out of his way to dismiss most of the people who got him into power. Slapping Graham and McCarthy to be his donkeys is not a good look.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 14 Feb 2021 22:16:07 +0000 moat comment 300379 at http://dagblog.com