dagblog - Comments for "&quot;I will destroy you&quot;: Biden aide threatened a Politico reporter pursuing a story on his relationship" http://dagblog.com/link/i-will-destroy-you-biden-aide-threatened-politico-reporter-pursuing-story-his-relationship Comments for ""I will destroy you": Biden aide threatened a Politico reporter pursuing a story on his relationship" en talking to Trump fans... Hey http://dagblog.com/comment/300845#comment-300845 <a id="comment-300845"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300619#comment-300619">Present your evidence.  And</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">talking to Trump fans... Hey US media folks, here, I would argue immodestly, is how you interview a Trump supporter on Trump's lies:<a href="https://t.co/D8qElaic7o">pic.twitter.com/D8qElaic7o</a></p> — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) <a href="https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/1062706401804455937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 14, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:13:35 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300845 at http://dagblog.com Analogy, Jeff - Fire Chief is http://dagblog.com/comment/300844#comment-300844 <a id="comment-300844"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300807#comment-300807">Just like the Democrats in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Analogy, Jeff - Fire Chief is having a cookout with his buds in the woods, drinking, shooting the shit. He goes home, his buds keep drinking, later fires breaking out all over the woods. Fire department calls him, says there's a huge problem, fire chief says "i didn't cause it - but man is it pretty. Thise crazy friends of mine." and goes back to sleep. Should he be disallowed from any fire fighting position of responsibility ever again?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:12:23 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300844 at http://dagblog.com I hope Psaki never smiles at http://dagblog.com/comment/300823#comment-300823 <a id="comment-300823"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300510#comment-300510">Impeach Joe, Jeff - &quot;You Lie!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I hope Psaki never smiles at me like that.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:00:37 +0000 moat comment 300823 at http://dagblog.com Are referring to another http://dagblog.com/comment/300820#comment-300820 <a id="comment-300820"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300807#comment-300807">Just like the Democrats in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Are you referring to another event than the <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-impeachment-trial-senators-vote-on-witnesses-11580508468">Senate refusing requests for witnesses</a> in the first impeachment trial?</p> <p>Do you mean to point to some other factor than <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/11/14/impeachment-hearings-donald-trump-blocks-firsthand-witnesses-editorials-debates/4195846002/">Trump blocking firsthand witnesses</a> to events surrounding the Ukraine adventure?</p> <p>Or would you like to go further back in time to the Mueller investigation where the subpoena for <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/20/trump-stops-ex-white-house-counsel-don-mcgahn-testifying-to-congress">Don McGahn to testify</a> is still being processed through the courts?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Feb 2021 20:56:55 +0000 moat comment 300820 at http://dagblog.com What is the President's duty http://dagblog.com/comment/300812#comment-300812 <a id="comment-300812"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300807#comment-300807">Just like the Democrats in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What is the President's duty when the Capitol is under attack - to jack off while watching NewsMax? He took an oath, right?</p> <p>So no, l'il Jeff, the ball's in your court - put up or shut the fuck up - what did your loser president do to defend the Capitol and Constitution, or was he AWOL/off calling a Code Red?</p> <p>I think it's checkmate - deflection and whataboutism doesn't always work. Sometimes you have to answer yourself, not just ask questions.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:22:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300812 at http://dagblog.com Just like the Democrats in http://dagblog.com/comment/300807#comment-300807 <a id="comment-300807"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300621#comment-300621">Read the fucking papers - you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just like the Democrats in during the last impeachment.  They had a chance to call witnesses and then realized what a BIG mistake that was and backed out.  Maybe would have found out who doctored the evidence they sent to Trump's legal team.</p> <p>You had a chance to post your evidence and your response is "read the newspapers".  LOL  What evidence did ANY newspaper claim.  You know, real statements from real people in a position to know. </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:51:01 +0000 Jeff comment 300807 at http://dagblog.com Read the fucking papers - you http://dagblog.com/comment/300621#comment-300621 <a id="comment-300621"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300619#comment-300619">Present your evidence.  And</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Read the fucking papers - you know, your "fake news".<br /> Obviously you don't give a fuck, even his speech is full of incitement, <br /> AND HE DIDN"T DO A FUCKING THING TO STOP THE PROTESTS.</p> <p>So you show me *your* evidence that he did something,  you twat -<br /> otherwise it *IS* proof of dereliction of duty, as President &amp; Commander-in-Chief,<br /> even without his speeches, his taped phone call to Georgia's Secretary of State,<br /> McCarthy's word about Trump's call to him to not do anything,<br /> his aides like Roger Stone meeting with Proud Boys &amp; OathKeepers<br /> etc., etc. If your head is full of shit and sand, there's nothing I can do to "proof" my way in.<br /><br /> But to reiterate - he had a job to do, and if he didn't, that's highly impeachable,<br /> and he should have been removed and barred from office forever,<br /> just as a soldier who buggered out in the middle of battle would be dishonorably discharged - <br /> even more so for a General who went AWOL. They attacked Congress in the middle of<br /> an Election count. No mulligans for Trump.</p> <p>So, you gonna provide a list of what Trump did to stop the attack on the Capitol,<br /> or you gonna sit around and kibbitz about Biden or whatever other useless topic<br /> you can obsess on? Ball's in your court. Go ahead, dribble.<br /><br /> ETA - Trump's crooked colleagues &amp; assistants:<br /> - Manafort (campaign head) - convicted<br /> - Roger Stone - muckraker - convicted<br /> - Michael Cohen - lawyer - convicted<br /> - Michael Flynn - pled guilty twice<br /> - Steve Bannon (campaign head, advisor) - indicted<br /> - Rick Gates (campaign deputy, pled guilty)<br /> - George Papadopoulos - adviser, pled guilty<br /> - George Nader - advisor, pled guilty<br /> I've lost track of how many Proud Boys et al were arrested, plus Bannon &amp; Stone may be involved with this one -<br /> we'll just have to wait. But experience says this group's not clean.<br /> - fake scam university shut down<br /> - fake scam charity shut down<br /> - caught giving dual property valuations to IRS &amp; prospective tenants/investors<br /> - bankruptcy, bankruptcy, bankruptcy</p> <p>- caught cheating on his taxes plus used that cheating to screw relatives out of inheritance</p> <p><br /> If character's a witness, Trump's already guilty.<br /> Which part of the House evidence did you disagree with? or like half the GOP Senators you closed your ears/went AWOL yourself?<br /> - </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:46:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300621 at http://dagblog.com Present your evidence.  And http://dagblog.com/comment/300619#comment-300619 <a id="comment-300619"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300534#comment-300534">What do you think of Trump</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Present your evidence.  And please avoid hearsay.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:48:53 +0000 Jeff comment 300619 at http://dagblog.com What do you think of Trump http://dagblog.com/comment/300534#comment-300534 <a id="comment-300534"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300533#comment-300533">The smell of righteous</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What do you think of Trump abandoning the Capitol, dereliction of duty that would get any soldier court-martialed? Or stacking DoD earlier to interfere with National Guard response. Oh right, you don't actually answer any serious questions, just stuff off your conservative Gotcha sheet. Useless as tits on a warthog. Yeah, you can use that one as well. Maybe put it on your Pinterest site.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:53:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 300534 at http://dagblog.com The smell of righteous http://dagblog.com/comment/300533#comment-300533 <a id="comment-300533"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/300493#comment-300493">Sorry, i just spent a year</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The smell of righteous indignation in the afternoon.  How refreshing.  One might take you more seriously but your overt partisanship makes it nearly impossible.</p> <p>Oh...you're right..you caught me.  I've never seen or heard "you go girl" anywhere other than a dagblog post by you.  Maybe you should think about getting that copyrighted or trademarked or something.  You know, so everyone knows you invented it.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:24:35 +0000 Jeff comment 300533 at http://dagblog.com