dagblog - Comments for "Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records"

3 National elections plus 2

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:20:20 +0000

3 National elections plus 2 mid-week elections have gone by since that NYTimes article. Even vote/election assurance from 2020 was way way better than 2016 (and i was quite surprised, considering Trump, Barr & de Joy pushed to screw it up/bias it.) So it's falling that the (til recently) least judicial justice on the court reaches back to pull a misleading article out of someone's ass from 8 1/2 years ago as "justification" for right-wing talking points for a decade (cf Hans von Spakovsky, among others)

Lawyers Compare Justice

artappraiser — Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:26:09 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records

Lawyers Compare Justice Thomas’ Dissent on Pa. Election Cases to Rumsfeld’s ‘The Absence of Evidence Is Not the Evidence of Absence’https://t.co/ae1eYGCx3U
— Law & Crime (@lawcrimenews) February 23, 2021

The wife of Lt. Col. Vindman

artappraiser — Tue, 23 Feb 2021 01:23:05 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records

The wife of Lt. Col. Vindman points out that "witch hunt" is capitalized in Trump's prepared statement

There is no need to capitalize witch hunt. Thank you. https://t.co/MfMO5HiIHb
— Rachel Vindman (@natsechobbyist) February 22, 2021

though I have to likewise point out that if he were still on Twitter we would still be seeing it in ALL CAPS.

Turns out the Manhattan D.A.

artappraiser — Tue, 23 Feb 2021 01:07:56 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records

Turns out the Manhattan D.A. already has TrumpCo's property tax information and it's for a criminal probe.

Exclusive: New York City tax agency subpoenaed in Trump criminal probe | Reuters https://t.co/q6yrDOU8uV
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) February 20, 2021

but wait, there's more, it's

artappraiser — Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:58:41 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records

but wait, there's more, it's almost like they're open to listening to all complaints about the Trump administration:

BREAKING: The Supreme Court agreed to hear our challenge to Trump's Title X rule.

The rule gutted the national family planning program, which had been the only source of reproductive health care for millions with low incomes, disproportionately harming Black and Brown people.
— ACLU (@ACLU) February 22, 2021

click on tweet for more, as it's a thread.

holy moly, they also

artappraiser — Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:53:51 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records

holy moly, they also proclaimed a trifecta "fuck you" to further election challenges:

NEW: Supreme Court DENIES crackpot effort to review dismissal of the Michigan Kraken conspiracy case.https://t.co/DGLdq4cLo1
— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) February 22, 2021

NEW: Supreme Court ends the frivolous lawsuit filed by Pennsylvania GOP Congressman Mike Kelly that sought to block certification of the 2020 elections--including his own.https://t.co/KgtT3qohX9
— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) February 22, 2021

NEW: Supreme Court DENIES Trump request to review Wisconsin post-election recount case.https://t.co/YXiMPxxb6w
— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) February 22, 2021

Michael Cohen statement: “The

artappraiser — Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:49:23 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court again rejects Trump’s bid to shield tax returns, other financial records

Michael Cohen statement: “The Supreme Court has now proclaimed that no one is above the law. Trump will, for the first time, have to take responsibility for his own dirty deeds.” https://t.co/tFoAMfupwB
— Katy Tur (@KatyTurNBC) February 22, 2021