dagblog - Comments for "What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan" http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986 Comments for "What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan" en What's been going on in the http://dagblog.com/comment/301812#comment-301812 <a id="comment-301812"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What's been going on in the Senate the last couple hours from Shahil Kapur. Mitch wants to go to bed, they vote no 50-49, fuck u grampa, they're gonna go all night, MORE</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">ELEVEN HOURS LATER: The Senate has yet to call the minimum wage vote as Democrats ready their new jobless benefit amendment for prime time.<br /><br /> The chamber is mostly empty. <a href="https://t.co/IgCmKRyaet">pic.twitter.com/IgCmKRyaet</a></p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368035268574470145?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">And 11 hours and 50 minutes later, the Senate finishes the vote on the first amendment to the Covid relief bill.<br /><br /> "Voting will resume shortly," <a href="https://twitter.com/SenSchumer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenSchumer</a> says. "Now that this agreement has reached we are going to power through the rest of this process and get this bill done."</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368047859426357249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">McConnell mocks Democrats for their internal divisions that forced this delay. "What this proves is there are benefits to bipartisanship," he says. As majority leader, McConnell pursued partisan votes (unsuccessfully) for ACA repeal and (successfully) on a major tax overhaul.</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368049238391861252?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">McConnell calls for the Senate to adjourn until 10 am tomorrow. The chamber is voting on it now.</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368049313885093889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">And the Senate votes 50-49 to reject McConnell's motion to adjourn the chamber.<br /><br /> They're gonna go all night.</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368057943095185408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">How one Senate Dem aide expects this to play out:<br /><br /> Portman is offering his amendment to slash jobless benefits and it will PASS.<br /><br /> Then Dems will pass the deal they cut with Manchin to supersede that amendment.<br /><br /> (Again, per this source.)<br /><br /> A way to maneuver around this landmine.</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368061142531194880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Joe Manchin has voted for Portman's amendment so it is indeed on track to pass.</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368061807299018752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Sinema, on the other hand, is voting with Dems to kill the Portman amendment that curtails jobless benefits.</p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1368062149126406146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:09:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 301812 at http://dagblog.com BTW, as I stated on this http://dagblog.com/comment/301801#comment-301801 <a id="comment-301801"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/301799#comment-301799">&quot;Progressive&quot; group Justice</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>BTW, as I stated on this thread, I do think this was his part of plan, I think he already expected the minimum wage thing wasn't going to work out when he made this video, it's why he made it</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/reply/33989#comment-form"><u>BIDEN SPEAKING ON THE RIGHT TO UNIONIZE</u></a></p> <p>especially as I am sure he knows that just Amazon workers alone having a union would make a <em>huge </em>difference pronto and that the effect would spread!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 05 Mar 2021 21:49:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 301801 at http://dagblog.com "Progressive" group Justice http://dagblog.com/comment/301799#comment-301799 <a id="comment-301799"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Progressive" group Justice Dems doing the "cancel the Biden wing" thing:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A statement of position, or pledge to fight for a policy goal, is not a “campaign promise” which becomes broken when others in Congress don’t agree with you. <a href="https://t.co/LZMRWzLaZr">https://t.co/LZMRWzLaZr</a></p> — Bill Scher (@billscher) <a href="https://twitter.com/billscher/status/1367954185434640388?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Eh, it's just playing to their choir.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 05 Mar 2021 21:43:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 301799 at http://dagblog.com Senate quickly losing all http://dagblog.com/comment/301794#comment-301794 <a id="comment-301794"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Senate quickly losing all semblance of the grownup chamber it was intended to be, Sinema doing House-style performance art, role play/antics to emphasize culture wars</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>She’s decided she’s going to be a media darling as Marie Antoinette of the establishment. Dress in a super fun way, do performatively hip thumbs downs as she votes to kill higher wages &amp; now rub it in with symbolic cake we can all eat instead of higher salaries. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CorporateTool?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CorporateTool</a> <a href="https://t.co/IvbzF7NfOj">https://t.co/IvbzF7NfOj</a></p> — Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur) <a href="https://twitter.com/cenkuygur/status/1367926959628455937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Kyrsten Sinema flippantly tried and failed to emulate John McCain.<br /><br /> Instead she ended up with a sort of Sarah Palin meets Marie Antoinette energy.</p> — Shari Lynn (@LynnSharig8) <a href="https://twitter.com/LynnSharig8/status/1367931911637700615?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Strong Marie Antoinette energy. <a href="https://t.co/tGORPD6Ido">https://t.co/tGORPD6Ido</a></p> — Dwight Rhinosoros (@rhinosoros) <a href="https://twitter.com/rhinosoros/status/1367915860917161987?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Note that the "Official New York Socialist" basically loves him some of this, chomping at the bit to play.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 05 Mar 2021 21:08:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 301794 at http://dagblog.com Senate at standstill with http://dagblog.com/comment/301788#comment-301788 <a id="comment-301788"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Senate at standstill with Manchin surprise:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The Manchin surprise:<br /><br /> - Dems fear he'll back the GOP plan to pare back jobless benefits<br /> - GOP working to line up support from all 50 members<br /> - Dems working to get him to back WH-Dem deal<br /> - Manchin concerned about $10,200 in tax-free jobless benefits<br /> - Senate in a standstill <a href="https://t.co/dTUo66IKer">pic.twitter.com/dTUo66IKer</a></p> — Manu Raju (@mkraju) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1367934047054336000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 05 Mar 2021 20:22:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 301788 at http://dagblog.com the future is starting to http://dagblog.com/comment/301717#comment-301717 <a id="comment-301717"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/301708#comment-301708">Krugman&#039;s 7 tweets to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>the future is starting to look bright if we pass it, who'd a thunk it</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A year-long pandemic leading to higher long-run economic output is the best evidence that the future is in fact a policy choice. <a href="https://t.co/nVKaFZ2A4F">https://t.co/nVKaFZ2A4F</a></p> — Conor Sen (@conorsen) <a href="https://twitter.com/conorsen/status/1367224369697677315?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:41:14 +0000 artappraiser comment 301717 at http://dagblog.com Ezra's wonk brain really http://dagblog.com/comment/301716#comment-301716 <a id="comment-301716"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ezra's wonk brain really working overtime today, wish I knew what he had for breakfast:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">That reflects their base — while the Rescue Act won't get a single Republican vote in Congress, it has huge support among actual Republicans. When asked if it should be abandoned for a smaller, bipartisan bill, half of Republicans say no! <a href="https://t.co/jnhP4l5Mn0">https://t.co/jnhP4l5Mn0</a></p> — Ezra Klein (@ezraklein) <a href="https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1367519889120894978?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:38:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 301716 at http://dagblog.com Krugman's 7 tweets to the http://dagblog.com/comment/301708#comment-301708 <a id="comment-301708"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Krugman's 6 tweets to the faithful warning about perfect being enemy of the good, stop nitpicking and move:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>As the Senate begins debate on the Biden relief bill, let me remind everyone of three crucial facts:<br /><br /> 1. The bill is imperfect — because all legislation is imperfect<br /><br /> 2. Nonetheless, it's very, very good<br /><br /> 3. The clock is ticking 1/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1367533565639077889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>On (1), sure, you can argue that some aid recipients don't need the money as badly as others. An idealized bill would target aid more accurately on families, local governments etc hurt worst by the pandemic. But so what? 2/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1367534028392456192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>The great bulk of the proposed outlays will go to extremely worthy causes — shots in arms, reopened schools, sustaining the unemployed, avoiding cuts in crucial services, and more. Compared with real-world bills of the past, this one is amazingly good 3/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1367534618069643288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>And it must be done fast. If it doesn't happen literally within days, some unemployed workers will be cut off. Beyond that, anyone awake in 2009 knows that political momentum, once lost, is very hard to regain. 4/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1367535041790763009?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>So for good-faith critics of the details: OK, you've been heard. If some of the problems you've predicted, like inflationary heating, come true — I don't think so, but they might — your prescience will be duly acknowledged 5/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1367535515105431552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>But this thing isn't going back to the drawing board. The choice now is to pass it, imperfections and all, or have the whole effort to rescue the economy crash and burn. Please, let's just get this done 6/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1367535929297149955?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p>and a good reminder in reply to him:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>And remember this bill has huge BIPARTISAN support from every around the country except DC republicans. They don't want it to work because they know it's going to help a lot of people who are hurting and that's not going to help their 2022 campaign agenda. Not one bit.</p> — Conor Sheridan - Wear a mask. (@conorfsheridan) <a href="https://twitter.com/conorfsheridan/status/1367534137171656708?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:52:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 301708 at http://dagblog.com Sen. Johnson says he's http://dagblog.com/comment/301703#comment-301703 <a id="comment-301703"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Sen. Johnson says he's setting up shifts to make sure Senate Republicans force a ton of amendment votes on covid bill<br /><br /> “The better way of putting it is making sure that all amendments offered are all voted on."</p> — Burgess Everett (@burgessev) <a href="https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1367536314934063109?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2021 18:59:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 301703 at http://dagblog.com OMG, Trump has issued this http://dagblog.com/comment/301701#comment-301701 <a id="comment-301701"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/what-s-house-s-19-trillion-coronavirus-plan-33986">What’s in the House’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>OMG, Trump has issued this statement. He really has it out for Mitch, timed to hurt:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">TRUMP: “To set the record straight, there were two reasons the Senate races were lost in Georgia. ...<br /><br /> “Senator Mitch McConnell’s refusal to go above $600 per person on the stimulus check payments when the two Democrat opponents were touting $2,000 per person in ad after ad.” <a href="https://t.co/AwsygaXuLd">pic.twitter.com/AwsygaXuLd</a></p> — Scott Wong (@scottwongDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/scottwongDC/status/1367534323570790400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 04 Mar 2021 18:53:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 301701 at http://dagblog.com