dagblog - Comments for "NFT Art crash already?" http://dagblog.com/arts/nft-art-crash-already-34192 Comments for "NFT Art crash already?" en NFT art is taking over! http://dagblog.com/comment/305869#comment-305869 <a id="comment-305869"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts/nft-art-crash-already-34192">NFT Art crash already?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NFT art is taking over! Cryptocurrency is going to allow artists and creators and really take over their own work! <a href="https://somedigitalnftcompany.com">Promote NFT Art Here.</a>  [<em>congratulations, our 1st NFT spam post - PP</em>]</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 24 May 2021 19:51:00 +0000 NYC NFT ART comment 305869 at http://dagblog.com Emily takes home $175k http://dagblog.com/comment/305407#comment-305407 <a id="comment-305407"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/304488#comment-304488">NFTease: Emily&#039;s art play </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Emily takes home $175k</p> <p><a href="https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/emily-ratajkowski-nft-sale-christies/index.html">https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/emily-ratajkowski-nft-sale-christi...</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 14 May 2021 21:50:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 305407 at http://dagblog.com Virtual fashion replaces real http://dagblog.com/comment/304885#comment-304885 <a id="comment-304885"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts/nft-art-crash-already-34192">NFT Art crash already?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Virtual fashion replaces real</p> <p>(fast fashion? tired. Wardrobes are meant to be seen, not worn, at least not in meat space)</p> <p><a href="https://www.inputmag.com/style/virtual-fashion-digital-clothes-nfts-gucci-augmented-reality-sneakers-balenciaga-video-game">https://www.inputmag.com/style/virtual-fashion-digital-clothes-nfts-gucc...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 May 2021 06:18:43 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 304885 at http://dagblog.com I'd guess Soviet women are http://dagblog.com/comment/304526#comment-304526 <a id="comment-304526"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/304517#comment-304517">thought-provoker I just ran</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd guess Soviet women are much much more proscribed in these freedoms, much narrower choices. It's a man's world for the most part.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:51:24 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 304526 at http://dagblog.com thought-provoker I just ran http://dagblog.com/comment/304517#comment-304517 <a id="comment-304517"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/304510#comment-304510">And then she was bashed for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thought-provoker I just ran across that goes with that (while it may be a generalization that's not 100% true; i.e., Soviet women)</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">It is capitalist America that produced the modern independent woman. Never in history have women had more freedom of choice in regard to dress, behavior, career, and sexual orientation. (SAAC 1992)</p> — CamillePagliaQuotes (@PagliaQuotes) <a href="https://twitter.com/PagliaQuotes/status/1384869535430418437?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:10:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 304517 at http://dagblog.com And then she was bashed for http://dagblog.com/comment/304510#comment-304510 <a id="comment-304510"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/304491#comment-304491">yeah, is true, pretty clear</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And then she was bashed for NFT being unenvironmental (funny, didn't see fuckall worry last week when praising Nas for ho much he's made. And, it's mining etherum that's a pig - go to Proof of Stake or other metric and the Chinese Bitcoin farms go cold). We live in weird times. But still, dudez wanna see tits, at least the one with the tits should get paid, not some flat-chested pecker-head go-between. This *is* the world being set right, bit by bit.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:24:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 304510 at http://dagblog.com yeah, is true, pretty clear http://dagblog.com/comment/304491#comment-304491 <a id="comment-304491"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/304488#comment-304488">NFTease: Emily&#039;s art play </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>yeah, is true, pretty clear that the nft boyz haven't given much thought to the copyright problem, ironically <em>EVEN THOUGH</em> their pals the blockchain sales reps have been driving many of us crazy<em> for several years </em>trying to convince everyone that blockchain would be the ideal answer to copyright issues, among other things...</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:18:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 304491 at http://dagblog.com NFTease: Emily's art play http://dagblog.com/comment/304488#comment-304488 <a id="comment-304488"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts/nft-art-crash-already-34192">NFT Art crash already?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NFTease: Emily's art play (beat or be beaten</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">How many ways does this demonstrate that copyright doesn’t “work”? (Cc ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@brianlfrye</a>⁩ ) <a href="https://t.co/7WC1wUaFDa">https://t.co/7WC1wUaFDa</a></p> — Cynthia B. Meyers (@AnneHummert) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnneHummert/status/1386006314397077506?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A new twist in the NFT saga: Emily Ratajkowski re-appropriates Richard Prince <a href="https://t.co/jlRFdjHwi8">https://t.co/jlRFdjHwi8</a></p> — Andres Guadamuz (@technollama) <a href="https://twitter.com/technollama/status/1385949297376698369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Apr 2021 23:06:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 304488 at http://dagblog.com This meta part at the top was http://dagblog.com/comment/304058#comment-304058 <a id="comment-304058"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts/nft-art-crash-already-34192">NFT Art crash already?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This meta part at the top was very interesting news to me <em>This article was originally published by The Art Newspaper<u>,</u> <u>an editorial partner of CNN Style</u></em>.</p> <p>They actually set up an NFT section once the flood of writing of "now wassup with that" started becoming necessary, so it did not overwhelm "the other art market" news. <a href="https://www.theartnewspaper.com/nfts">https://www.theartnewspaper.com/nfts</a>. This is a major "developing", the maniacs are not going to let it go at that, it's not over til it's over.</p> <p>Aside. They are a real savvy journalistic outlet, seem more so every day. Except for one thing: if you access their articles anonymously, you get a paywall at 3 free per month; but if you register as a user, you get a constant message that you have 5 free articles left but you can access all the articles you want in eternity, though the message never disappears.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Apr 2021 18:52:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 304058 at http://dagblog.com