dagblog - Comments for "Merrick Garland Is Not Your Liberal Firebrand" http://dagblog.com/link/merrick-garland-not-your-liberal-firebrand-34399 Comments for "Merrick Garland Is Not Your Liberal Firebrand" en BTW, I was mindful of the New http://dagblog.com/comment/306937#comment-306937 <a id="comment-306937"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/306935#comment-306935">David Rohde:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>BTW, I was mindful of the New Yorker strike situation and was thinking of honoring their requests even though I pay for a subscription I can ill afford. Then I read this by Ben Smith @ the NYTimes, June 13: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/13/business/media/new-yorker-union.html?action=click&amp;module=In%20Other%20News&amp;pgtype=Homepage"><strong><em>Why The New Yorker’s Stars Didn’t Join Its Union</em></strong></a> and it all sounded too much like Yglesias at Vox and similar (and even a little like the "Strike MOMA" crew at times) and I decided we need more quality journalism of the meritocratic variety than we do millennial spoiled brats thinking everyone should be paid the same no matter what they do...</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:47:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 306937 at http://dagblog.com Uh, didn't Mueller already http://dagblog.com/comment/306936#comment-306936 <a id="comment-306936"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/306935#comment-306935">David Rohde:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Uh, didn't Mueller already prove he can't?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:41:54 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 306936 at http://dagblog.com David Rohde: http://dagblog.com/comment/306935#comment-306935 <a id="comment-306935"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/merrick-garland-not-your-liberal-firebrand-34399">Merrick Garland Is Not Your Liberal Firebrand</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>David Rohde:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Merrick Garland’s recent Trump-related decisions have led some to question whether a cautious institutionalist with a passionate belief in the need for fairness and neutrality can effectively counter the former President. <a href="https://t.co/AauTCc6nP8">https://t.co/AauTCc6nP8</a></p> — The New Yorker (@NewYorker) <a href="https://twitter.com/NewYorker/status/1404950979544498177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:34:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 306935 at http://dagblog.com