dagblog - Comments for "Sanders won&#039;t back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees" http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-wont-back-infrastructure-deal-more-gas-taxes-electric-vehicle-fees-34414 Comments for "Sanders won't back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees" en Kinda has a point though - http://dagblog.com/comment/307355#comment-307355 <a id="comment-307355"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/307351#comment-307351">oh boy, can&#039;t leave this take</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Kinda has a point though - albeit a year ago it was all white dudes and Ivanka. Still, if you're coordinating initiatives that includes supports for "underserved" minorities, it might make sense to have some minority representation. Of course there are questions about which committees are involved, which senators represent key constituencies to pass this legislation, etc, so it might not line up. Basically it'd have to be 1 of 5 D m Senators)</p> <p><img alt="" src="https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fbccad2f8-3cb7-4d21-b1bc-c464eedfd179.jpg?fit=scale-down&amp;source=next&amp;width=700" width="500" /></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:14:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 307355 at http://dagblog.com oh boy, can't leave this take http://dagblog.com/comment/307351#comment-307351 <a id="comment-307351"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/307350#comment-307350">Kabuki shows in spades. The</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>oh boy, can't leave this take out, also at The Hill</p> <p><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/house/560099-ocasio-cortez-criticizes-bipartisan-deal" title="Ocasio-Cortez criticizes bipartisan infrastructure deal for lack of diversity among negotiators ">Ocasio-Cortez criticizes bipartisan infrastructure deal for lack of diversity among negotiators</a></p> <p>BY <a href="https://thehill.com/author/mychael-schnell">MYCHAEL SCHNELL</a> 9H AGO</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 25 Jun 2021 05:41:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 307351 at http://dagblog.com Kabuki shows in spades. The http://dagblog.com/comment/307350#comment-307350 <a id="comment-307350"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-wont-back-infrastructure-deal-more-gas-taxes-electric-vehicle-fees-34414">Sanders won&#039;t back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Kabuki shows in spades. The first four here are all at The Hill right now. Then there's the Utah Gov's retweet of Mitt's tweet.  What did that<a href="http://dagblog.com/link/how-america-fractured-four-parts-34379"> Geo. Packer article</a> say? Four parts? Is like quadrapatisanship?</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/how-america-fractured-four-parts-34379">Democrats seek to calm nervous left</a></p> <p>BY <a href="https://thehill.com/author/cristina-marcos">CRISTINA MARCOS</a> - 06/24/21 05:57 PM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>Democratic leaders are trying to assure nervous progressives that their priorities for climate change, paid family leave and other “human infrastructure” can still be delivered even with <a href="https://thehill.com/people/joe-biden">President Biden</a> embracing a much more narrowly focused Senate infrastructure deal.</p> <p>Speaker <a href="https://thehill.com/people/nancy-pelosi">Nancy Pelosi</a> (D-Calif.) made clear Thursday that the House won’t vote on any bipartisan infrastructure deal until the Senate also passes a larger package with Democratic priorities through the budget reconciliation process that can evade a GOP filibuster.</p> <p>It was a move by Pelosi intended to calm the unrest among liberals, and it sent a strong signal to the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue as well [.....]</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/560145-mcconnell-slams-biden-for-alreadhttps://thehill.com/homenews/senate/560145-mcconnell-slams-biden-for-already-caving-to-left-on-infrastructure-dealy-caving-to-left-on-infrastructure-deal">McConnell slams Biden for already 'caving' to left on infrastructure deal</a></p> <p>BY <a href="https://thehill.com/author/alexander-bolton">ALEXANDER BOLTON</a> - 06/24/21 05:40 PM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>Senate Minority Leader <a href="https://thehill.com/people/mitch-mcconnell">Mitch McConnell</a> (R-Ky.) on Thursday afternoon slammed <a href="https://thehill.com/people/joe-biden">President Biden</a> for “caving” to his left flank after the president endorsed a bipartisan $579 billion, five-year infrastructure framework and then threatened to veto it if it’s not accompanied by a much larger reconciliation package.</p> <p>“Less than two hours after publicly commending our colleagues and actually endorsing the bipartisan agreement, the president took the extraordinary step of threatening to veto it. It was a tale of two press conferences,” McConnell said on the floor.</p> <p>McConnell’s criticism is the latest sign that the Democratic strategy of trying to pass Biden’s infrastructure on two tracks consisting of a scaled-down bipartisan package and a larger partisan reconciliation package will be difficult to pull off [....]</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/560110-manchin-says-democratic-only-ihttps://thehill.com/homenews/senate/560110-manchin-says-democratic-only-infrastructure-bill-inevitablenfrastructure-bill-inevitable">Manchin says Democratic-only infrastructure bill 'inevitable'</a></p> <p>BY <a href="https://thehill.com/author/jordain-carney">JORDAIN CARNEY</a> - 06/24/21 03:30 PM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>Sen. <a href="https://thehill.com/people/joe-manchin">Joe Manchin</a> (D-W.Va.) said on Thursday that it was "inevitable" that Democrats would move forward with a separate, Democrat-only infrastructure package — it was just a question of what the size and scope will be.  </p> <p>"Reconciliation is inevitable because basically Republicans I understand on the tax they don't want to undo anything on the 2017 [bill]. For those who didn't vote for 2017, there should be some adjustments. I'm open to that," Manchin told reporters.  </p> <p>Manchin's remarks are a huge boon for Democrats because the party needs all 50 of its members to support reconciliation — the budget process that lets them bypass the 60-vote legislative filibuster [....]</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/560103-biden-says-he-wont-sign-bipartisan-bill-without-reconciliation-bill">Biden says he won't sign bipartisan bill without reconciliation bill</a></p> <p>BY <a href="https://thehill.com/author/alex-gangitano">ALEX GANGITANO</a> AND <a href="https://thehill.com/author/morgan-chalfant">MORGAN CHALFANT</a> - 06/24/21 03:01 PM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://thehill.com/people/joe-biden">President Biden</a> on Thursday said he won’t sign the bipartisan infrastructure deal if Congress doesn’t also pass a reconciliation bill, committing to a dual track system to get both bills passed.</p> <p>“I expect that in the coming months this summer, before the fiscal year is over, that we will have voted on this bill, the infrastructure bill, as well as voted on the budget resolution. But if only one comes to me, this is the only one that comes to me, I’m not signing it. It’s in tandem,” Biden told reporters at the White House.</p> <p>Speaker <a href="https://thehill.com/people/nancy-pelosi">Nancy Pelosi</a> (D-Calif.) said Thursday that the House would not vote on a bipartisan infrastructure bill until the Senate passes a larger set of Democratic priorities through budget reconciliation.</p> <p>Biden said he agreed with the Speaker on the sequencing [....]</p> </blockquote> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">We appreciate <a href="https://twitter.com/SenatorRomney?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenatorRomney</a>'s work on an infrastructure bill that includes funding for roads, broadband, and water storage projects.<br /><br /> Utah will need all of it and more to stay ahead of our explosive growth. We'll watch for details, but we’re encouraged to see the progress. <a href="https://t.co/IAw5oDwGDQ">https://t.co/IAw5oDwGDQ</a></p> — Utah Gov. Spencer J. Cox (@GovCox) <a href="https://twitter.com/GovCox/status/1408174474902401025?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 25 Jun 2021 05:37:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 307350 at http://dagblog.com the President declares: http://dagblog.com/comment/307329#comment-307329 <a id="comment-307329"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-wont-back-infrastructure-deal-more-gas-taxes-electric-vehicle-fees-34414">Sanders won&#039;t back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>the President<em> declares:</em></p> <p><em> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">We’ve struck a deal. A group of senators – five Democrats and five Republicans – has come together and forged an infrastructure agreement that will create millions of American jobs.</p> — President Biden (@POTUS) <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1408103224817639432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </em></p> <p>I think it's important to note that it's a declarative statement.</p> <p>He's standing behind the bipartisan group as representing the real power in Congress.</p> <p>If it's derailed by others they will be painted as the radical obstructionists.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:33:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 307329 at http://dagblog.com op-ed published by Fox News: http://dagblog.com/comment/307317#comment-307317 <a id="comment-307317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-wont-back-infrastructure-deal-more-gas-taxes-electric-vehicle-fees-34414">Sanders won&#039;t back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>op-ed published by Fox News:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Big Tech’s monopoly powers must be broken up — conservatives should support our bipartisan antitrust reform bills.<a href="https://t.co/DWNtnfOZ9m">https://t.co/DWNtnfOZ9m</a></p> — Rep. Ken Buck (@RepKenBuck) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepKenBuck/status/1407670181111947267?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jun 2021 03:50:37 +0000 artappraiser comment 307317 at http://dagblog.com Politico implies Green http://dagblog.com/comment/307311#comment-307311 <a id="comment-307311"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-wont-back-infrastructure-deal-more-gas-taxes-electric-vehicle-fees-34414">Sanders won&#039;t back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Politico implies Green Lanterism or a variant is a growing problem among progressives in Congress:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Important read amid the infrastructure deal drama from <a href="https://twitter.com/lbarronlopez?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@lbarronlopez</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/nicholaswu12?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nicholaswu12</a> <a href="https://t.co/dQeZMMyRh5">https://t.co/dQeZMMyRh5</a></p> — Elana Schor (@eschor) <a href="https://twitter.com/eschor/status/1407878403492134914?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Like children wanting a daddie to make it all better; like they were promised a rose garden and wouldn't have to work. When some of the buzzwords in their very own campaigns are responsible for losing seats elsewhere for Dems in the House! Personally I'd like to see less dumping on Manchin, at least he works on trying to make deals! I don't get what they don't get about this not being a progressive country! Many other countries that were once more progressive are going more conservative. Hello, reality. Why not stay in local politics if there were majority of friendlies there in your district. In DC, this is a grownup making sausage place. The Republicans won't play fair, waaaaah.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jun 2021 02:02:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 307311 at http://dagblog.com MANCHIN http://dagblog.com/comment/307308#comment-307308 <a id="comment-307308"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-wont-back-infrastructure-deal-more-gas-taxes-electric-vehicle-fees-34414">Sanders won&#039;t back infrastructure deal with more gas taxes, electric vehicle fees</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">MANCHIN<br /><br /> —Expresses openness to a major reconciliation bill<br /><br /> —Echoes Biden on investing in "human infrastructure"<br /><br /> —Says size/scope TBD but doesn't draw a red line<br /><br /> —Wants to pay for it by unwinding Trump tax cuts<br /><br /> —Says '17 tax law was tilted to the rich<a href="https://t.co/5RT1wUbhR4">https://t.co/5RT1wUbhR4</a></p> — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1407713247990587395?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>^ that was 10 hrs. ago. 3 hrs. ago &gt;</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">On infrastructure talks, Cassidy asked “Are you on the verge?” his response, “of a nervous breakdown”.</p> — Christian Hall (@christianjhall) <a href="https://twitter.com/christianjhall/status/1407825472227061761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>now &gt;</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The tentative bipartisan framework reached among senators tonight calls for $559B in new spending (down from $579B because of new decision to repurpose $20B in previously appropriated broadband funds).</p> — Jennifer Haberkorn (@jenhab) <a href="https://twitter.com/jenhab/status/1407873155704803330?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The senators will go to the White House tomorrow to present the framework to Biden.</p> — Jennifer Haberkorn (@jenhab) <a href="https://twitter.com/jenhab/status/1407873743662235649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Jun 2021 01:30:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 307308 at http://dagblog.com Biden's a Zappa fan - Choose http://dagblog.com/comment/307254#comment-307254 <a id="comment-307254"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/307251#comment-307251">this is a surprising</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Biden's a Zappa fan - <a href="https://www.hogranch.com/cheese.html">Choose Cheese!</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:14:06 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 307254 at http://dagblog.com scrolling thru the thread, it http://dagblog.com/comment/307253#comment-307253 <a id="comment-307253"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/307252#comment-307252">extra weird is that when I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>scrolling thru the thread, it has lots of interesting comments, like this:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Literally saw this ad (???) in LA this week. Ohio craves more human sacrifice <a href="https://t.co/Lsg0yhoTs9">pic.twitter.com/Lsg0yhoTs9</a></p> — bee (@apbeeZah) <a href="https://twitter.com/apbeeZah/status/1407395329784258561?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 22, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:57:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 307253 at http://dagblog.com extra weird is that when I http://dagblog.com/comment/307252#comment-307252 <a id="comment-307252"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/307251#comment-307251">this is a surprising</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>extra weird is that when I went back to Twitter, first thing I saw was this retweeted:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>ppl be like yea bro move to the midwest its so cheap ur neighbors are gonna be a corn field and the family from get out</p> — first-mate prance (@bocxtop) <a href="https://twitter.com/bocxtop/status/1407047133224738817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 21, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>if i wanted to pay to be somewhere im miserable imma just go to the club dude i dont need to relocate</p> — first-mate prance (@bocxtop) <a href="https://twitter.com/bocxtop/status/1407048397899636737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 21, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>just gonna warn anyone who wants to be cute and remind me that i live in fl*rida i will hide ur reply then block</p> — first-mate prance (@bocxtop) <a href="https://twitter.com/bocxtop/status/1407100813382586381?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 21, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Yeah im good bro <a href="https://t.co/rkrJQULBn1">pic.twitter.com/rkrJQULBn1</a></p> — (@rad_vsn) <a href="https://twitter.com/rad_vsn/status/1407048638572945419?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 21, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:51:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 307252 at http://dagblog.com