dagblog - Comments for "An Update on the Book Formerly Known as How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas" http://dagblog.com/persecution-politics/update-book-formerly-known-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-3444 Comments for "An Update on the Book Formerly Known as How Bill O'Reilly Saved Christmas" en Funny. At that one link, the http://dagblog.com/comment/11817#comment-11817 <a id="comment-11817"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11816#comment-11816">Cleveland is correct. Don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Funny. At that one link, the subtitle read, <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Penis_percentile.svg">"Genghis was here." Not sure what that meant.</a></p></div></div></div> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:50:48 +0000 quinn esq comment 11817 at http://dagblog.com Cleveland is correct. Don't http://dagblog.com/comment/11816#comment-11816 <a id="comment-11816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11814#comment-11814">Pretty sure Butt Cheeks is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cleveland is correct. Don't mess with the literature scholar.</p> <p>Incidentally, as I was confirming the spelling, wikipedia surprised me with photos of male and female <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttcheek">buttocks</a>. Of course, I immediately wiki'd <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis">penis</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina">vagina</a> and was treated to more graphic anatomy. Who knew? (Other than millions of adolescents.)</p> <p>But back to the book, there is actually one buttcheek reference somewhere in the manuscript. The first person to find it after the book comes out and report back on this thread will receive a free signed photograph of my left buttcheek.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:30:16 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 11816 at http://dagblog.com And capitalized when refering http://dagblog.com/comment/11815#comment-11815 <a id="comment-11815"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11814#comment-11814">Pretty sure Butt Cheeks is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And capitalized when refering to someone named Butt Cheeks. Like Brett "Butt Cheeks" Favre.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:37:11 +0000 William K. Wolfrum comment 11815 at http://dagblog.com Pretty sure Butt Cheeks is http://dagblog.com/comment/11814#comment-11814 <a id="comment-11814"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11813#comment-11813">Quinn is absolutely right</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pretty sure Butt Cheeks is two words.</p> <p>Better ask Genghis though - we're stepping into his territory.</p> <p>Badabing Smiley-Face!</p></div></div></div> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:47:54 +0000 quinn esq comment 11814 at http://dagblog.com Quinn is absolutely right http://dagblog.com/comment/11813#comment-11813 <a id="comment-11813"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11810#comment-11810">See? Now that&#039;s just plain</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Quinn is absolutely right about this.</p> <p>That is why I have retitled my forthcoming scholarly monograph <i>Kiss My Buttcheeks, You Monkeys! How Iambic Pentameter Undermines Our Values and Destroys the Middle Class.</i></p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:26:58 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 11813 at http://dagblog.com I'll take that as snark. http://dagblog.com/comment/11812#comment-11812 <a id="comment-11812"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11807#comment-11807">I would have liked a bit more</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'll take that as snark.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:42:20 +0000 acanuck comment 11812 at http://dagblog.com See? Now that's just plain http://dagblog.com/comment/11810#comment-11810 <a id="comment-11810"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11806#comment-11806">Yes, there is a special</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>See? Now that's just plain BETTER. Your problem Genghis (well, AMONGST your problems...) is that you're too educated. Too intellectual. So consider this your wake-up call ---</p> <p><b>YOU'RE AN AMERICAN.</b></p> <p>Got it? Which means, you can think alllllll you like while WRITING the book. Be as smart as you like. But when it comes time to SELL it, you gotta be crass. Punch 'em in the nuts. Insult people. Start a fire. Blow smoke. Hell, set yourself on fire, if it helps.</p> <p>CRASS. We all know you got it in you.</p> <p>So when it comes time to promote your book, what are you going for again?</p> <p>Right. The nut-punch.And all the children say....</p> <p><b><i>YAY GENGHIS! EXCELLENT NUT-PUNCH! </i></b></p></div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:44:00 +0000 quinn esq comment 11810 at http://dagblog.com If Glenn Beck wears pasties, http://dagblog.com/comment/11809#comment-11809 <a id="comment-11809"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11806#comment-11806">Yes, there is a special</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If Glenn Beck wears pasties, I'll totally buy it.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:14:44 +0000 Orlando comment 11809 at http://dagblog.com Next time, I'll be sure to http://dagblog.com/comment/11808#comment-11808 <a id="comment-11808"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11804#comment-11804">See, I suggested, &quot;Whack</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Next time, I'll be sure to consult you before setting the title. BTW, the powers that be recently euthanized the entire Canadian goose population of Brooklyn's Prospect Park to avoid the whole jet engine thing. How long will it be before they start euthanizing all Canadians?</p></div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:10:56 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 11808 at http://dagblog.com I would have liked a bit more http://dagblog.com/comment/11807#comment-11807 <a id="comment-11807"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/11803#comment-11803">Hey, I&#039;d buy it, even at the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would have liked a bit more tonguecheekfulness, but I think that there was concern that casual browsers would miss the snark. Having seen even the wise Acanuck miss obvious snark, I can see their point.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:05:46 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 11807 at http://dagblog.com