dagblog - Comments for "Why Did California Shooter Target the Tides Foundation?"

This is really innovative and

Web Server Hosting — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:16:00 +0000

In reply to Why Did California Shooter Target the Tides Foundation?

This is really innovative and a new idea, I like this concept and the way it is carried out in so light and cool manner. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your future updates.

You've done a fantastic job

Demolition — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:01:00 +0000

In reply to You need to watch the program

You've done a fantastic job on this blog.

Birds fly. Terrorist fly

Verified Atheist — Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:22:07 +0000

In reply to Queston No matter how they

Birds fly. Terrorist fly planes into buildings. Therefore, birds are terrorists.

The first two facts provided above are correct. The conclusion is as reasonable as Glenn Beck's. There's a Latin expression non sequitor. Glenn Beck has effectively trade-marked non sequitor.

Queston No matter how they

Anonymous — Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:11:32 +0000

In reply to Thanks for this report. The

Queston No matter how they presented, ARE GLENN BECKS FACTS CORRECT? That is the real question here...It they are Not true then we all need to call him out onthe facts and not divert attention away from them and attach the manor in which the facts are presented. That is an old political trick ignore the facts and shoot the messanger.

I'm thinking about switching

Michael Wolraich — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:09:39 +0000

In reply to It's one of the humorous

I'm thinking about switching to Advertise Liberally. Adsense has been sucking for a long time.

It's one of the humorous

Anonymous — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:04:58 +0000

In reply to Hey G-why do you have an ad

It's one of the humorous effects of AdSense, I'm sure. Insulting the right wing means mentioning the right wing, which means being served ads supporting the right wing, at least in theory. In practice, considering the audience, those ads are hopefully providing additional insult to injury (ha!) by draining (albeit very slightly) their campaign coffers to appeal to people who have no interest in supporting them.