dagblog - Comments for "Supreme Court proxy docket" http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-proxy-docket-34570 Comments for "Supreme Court proxy docket" en here's a link to the ruling http://dagblog.com/comment/310446#comment-310446 <a id="comment-310446"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/310431#comment-310431">OK, NOW THE REAL GAME IS ON:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>here's a link to the ruling along with highlighted excerpt; it's quite fiery</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">NOW: A federal judge has blocked enforcement of SB 8, Texas's 6-week abortion ban, and denied Texas's request to pause his ruling pending appeal.<br /><br /> "...this Court will not sanction one more day of this offensive deprivation of such an important right."<a href="https://t.co/GCf6MrFB7C">https://t.co/GCf6MrFB7C</a> <a href="https://t.co/hTb7bd1sIG">pic.twitter.com/hTb7bd1sIG</a></p> — Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1445912486709010432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 7, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:25:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 310446 at http://dagblog.com OK, NOW THE REAL GAME IS ON: http://dagblog.com/comment/310431#comment-310431 <a id="comment-310431"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-proxy-docket-34570">Supreme Court proxy docket</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>OK, NOW THE REAL GAME IS ON:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Federal judge orders Texas to suspend the nation’s most restrictive abortion law, which banned most abortions statewide.</p> — Julie Pace (@JuliePace) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliePace/status/1445916146100748290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 7, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Maybe I'm wrong but I had an inkling the Supreme Court knew something like this was going to happen, i.e., waiting for something more substantive to come up the pike.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Oct 2021 01:03:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 310431 at http://dagblog.com Alito (and others): It's not http://dagblog.com/comment/310210#comment-310210 <a id="comment-310210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-proxy-docket-34570">Supreme Court proxy docket</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Alito (and others): It's not over til it's over; y'all making incorrect simple-minded if not moronic presumptions about us and we're getting tired of that</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">SCOTUS Justice Samuel Alito leapt into a political fray today, saying complaints about the court’s “shadow docket” are misplaced <a href="https://t.co/EfDLyb74aA">https://t.co/EfDLyb74aA</a></p> — POLITICO (@politico) <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1443668279759982595?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Excerpts:</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] In his address, Alito repeatedly railed against the media for propagating what he called “unfair and damaging attacks” on the court, but also accused “political figures” of doing the same.</p> <p>“The media and political talk about the shadow docket is not serious criticism,” Alito insisted. At another point, he snarked at the press: “Journalists may think we can dash off an opinion the way they dash off articles.”[....]</p> <p> </p> <p>Alito denounced what he called “false and inflammatory claims” that the court had overruled <em>Roe v. Wade</em> in its emergency order refusing to block the Texas abortion ban. “We did no such thing and we said that expressly,” the conservative justice declared.</p> <p>Alito noted that the urgency in the Texas case came not from the justices, but from abortion providers who sought relief from the justices about 36 hours before the law was to kick in.[....]</p> </blockquote> <p>ALSO:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Four justices -- Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Barrett -- have all recently given speeches punching down at the journalists who cover them.</p> — Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) <a href="https://twitter.com/imillhiser/status/1443637453513011200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 01 Oct 2021 02:27:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 310210 at http://dagblog.com interesting legal details: http://dagblog.com/comment/310047#comment-310047 <a id="comment-310047"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-proxy-docket-34570">Supreme Court proxy docket</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>interesting legal details:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Eleventh Circuit Chief Says Wait and See How SCOTUS Rules on Mississippi Abortion Ban <a href="https://t.co/U16S6ZrR5D">https://t.co/U16S6ZrR5D</a></p> — Law.com (@lawdotcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/lawdotcom/status/1441579878902480915?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2021 01:45:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 310047 at http://dagblog.com Doctor takes on TX abortion http://dagblog.com/comment/309917#comment-309917 <a id="comment-309917"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/309490#comment-309490">Supremes rule 5-4 against</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Doctor takes on TX abortion law</p> <p>(hopefully he'll take a coat hanger to them - give them a taste of their own medicine?)</p> <p><a href="https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_61466361e4b0e5dd4b27704c">https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_61466361e4b0e5dd4b27704c</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 19 Sep 2021 18:00:02 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 309917 at http://dagblog.com Helpful to look at big http://dagblog.com/comment/309573#comment-309573 <a id="comment-309573"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-proxy-docket-34570">Supreme Court proxy docket</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Helpful to look at big picture history of the political and cultural divide on this, what it used to be and what it changed to.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Democrats, with their Catholic working class base, were the anti-abortion party, Republicans, with their NE Anglo-Protestant business elite base, the pro-abortion party. <a href="https://t.co/o3pLV2Qgkb">https://t.co/o3pLV2Qgkb</a></p> — Wesley Yang (@wesyang) <a href="https://twitter.com/wesyang/status/1434166208690016259?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>For many reasons but one of them is that the Supreme Court tends to look at big picture when approaching cases like this, too.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Sep 2021 21:11:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 309573 at http://dagblog.com DOH! http://dagblog.com/comment/309567#comment-309567 <a id="comment-309567"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/309527#comment-309527">noted on the screwiness of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>DOH!</p> <blockquote> <p>Later on <em>Meet the Press</em>, GOP strategist Brendan Buck also lambasted the "asinine" Texas law, which he argued could backfire on Republicans. "What stops a California from banning guns by saying you can sue anybody who owns one," he said. "There's nothing conservative about how this is set up."</p> </blockquote> <p>from</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Former GOP congresswoman calls Texas abortion ban a 'bad policy and a bad law' <a href="https://t.co/kl5IZ3iMUZ">https://t.co/kl5IZ3iMUZ</a></p> — Heal the Planet (@fwtoney) <a href="https://twitter.com/fwtoney/status/1434586176065843201?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 5, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div>   </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Sep 2021 18:35:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 309567 at http://dagblog.com shocked to hear about all http://dagblog.com/comment/309540#comment-309540 <a id="comment-309540"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/309527#comment-309527">noted on the screwiness of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">shocked to hear about all these kids dying, after all I have heard about the nascent "culture of life" that is being built by the leadership of the state I grew up in <a href="https://t.co/0qfzYkLJdq">https://t.co/0qfzYkLJdq</a></p> — Christopher Federico (@ChrisPolPsych) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChrisPolPsych/status/1434224833718636550?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Sep 2021 18:38:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 309540 at http://dagblog.com Rideshare companies Lyft and http://dagblog.com/comment/309536#comment-309536 <a id="comment-309536"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/309527#comment-309527">noted on the screwiness of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Rideshare companies Lyft and Uber both separately announced they will cover legal fees for any drivers who are sued under Texas’ new abortion law for transporting women to abortion clinics <a href="https://t.co/h3QI9AGlUx">https://t.co/h3QI9AGlUx</a></p> — Forbes (@Forbes) <a href="https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1433923222244929537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 3, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Translation: don't even bother trying....</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Sep 2021 07:24:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 309536 at http://dagblog.com noted on the screwiness of http://dagblog.com/comment/309527#comment-309527 <a id="comment-309527"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-proxy-docket-34570">Supreme Court proxy docket</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>noted on the screwiness of the TX law itself and how it's not exactly traditionally conservative:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Offering citizens bounties to hunt down other citizens for “crimes” is pure evil. It is a form of illiberalism that’s truly poisonous.</p> — Andrew Sullivan (@sullydish) <a href="https://twitter.com/sullydish/status/1433528707751235588?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 2, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">3 not-mutually-exclusive explanations for Republican silence rattling around in my head:<br /><br /> 1. They wanted the issue, not the victory, and are sulking<br /><br /> 2. They fear the radicalism and messiness of this law specifically<br /><br /> 3. They plan to gaslight people that it didn’t happen at all <a href="https://t.co/PttRq3q8n1">https://t.co/PttRq3q8n1</a></p> — southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) <a href="https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1433572996560691206?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 2, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 03 Sep 2021 10:05:39 +0000 artappraiser comment 309527 at http://dagblog.com