dagblog - Comments for "Who Will Wrest Haiti From the Grip of Gang Rule?"

bluntly:

artappraiser — Wed, 20 Oct 2021 01:36:52 +0000

In reply to Who Will Wrest Haiti From the Grip of Gang Rule?

bluntly:

Only parts of the world that have seen police abolition are maybe remote regions of Afghanistan or Haiti where warlords and gangs rule instead.
— Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) October 20, 2021

Haiti needs rule of law. It has to be desired by the citizens (many African societies finally ahead of them on that, just beginning with making it work.) They'd have to leave behind a culture where one curries favor with whoever has power right now to get food or money or whatever.

Anarchists are full of bullshit, deluded about human nature. Sometimes a grifter or murderer is just a criminal that can't be reformed; we left Freud's ideas behind a long time ago about it all being caused by your childhood.

Haiti kidnappers 'demand $17m

artappraiser — Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:53:26 +0000

In reply to Who Will Wrest Haiti From the Grip of Gang Rule?

Haiti kidnappers 'demand $17m' for the missionarieshttps://t.co/kYPbH74RNi
— Okami Wolfen (@okamalita) October 19, 2021

Report: Haiti’s 400 Mawozo Gang Seeks $17M For Kidnapped US Missionaries https://t.co/aBhbG95qaR
— KBXX 97.9 The Box (@979TheBox) October 19, 2021

The missionaries were from an

artappraiser — Mon, 18 Oct 2021 07:49:55 +0000

In reply to American Missionaries

The missionaries were from an Ohio organization founded by Amish & Mennonites, not your typical roving evangelists:

Praying for my fellow Anabaptists in Haiti right now... https://t.co/PTZoYux6Z4
— Andrew Zimmerman (@Zimmerman1n) October 18, 2021

Flogblog

A Guy Called LULU — Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:05:41 +0000

In reply to Gabblog or Dagblog?

Flogblog

Gabba Gabba Hey!

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 17 Oct 2021 23:15:03 +0000

In reply to Gabblog or Dagblog?

Gabba Gabba Hey!

https://youtu.be/_57MlYta3E4

Gabblog or Dagblog?

NCD — Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:18:17 +0000

In reply to well here's some more. I

Gabblog or Dagblog?

well here's some more. I

artappraiser — Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:25:13 +0000

In reply to I think you are intelligent

well here's some more. I think it's highly interesting and a important clue to understanding all the conspiracizng that is part and parcel of the Haiti. Where there is no rule of law, a lot more people tend to do that, because they don't know who to trust and they blame anyone that fits their conspiracy theories for the situation they are in.

Plus here, politically conservative missionaries are bearing the blunt of this, from leftists, rather than the other way around! I think all of that is HIGHLY interesting.

Here she's not afraid of basically accusing the NYTimes of lying and covering up, to he, it is western missionaries that a major part of Haiti's problems. She's going to smear them with claims of heinous acts any chance she gets, yes, it is like Infowars of the left, and it must be working or she wouldn't keep doing it.

"What is Christian Aid Ministries and what does it do in Haiti?"

It's a child trafficking / child sex ring that kidnaps #Haiti's children from poor parents to fill their fake orphanages for profit and criminal / perverted sexual gratification. . https://t.co/V0k4iGWbBH
— Madame Boukman - Justice 4 Haiti (@madanboukman) October 17, 2021

Clearly, her game is always blame "the west." And hyerbole about evil. Just like a lot of the U.S. left does. Nobody's responsible for their own country because "the west" screwed them 200 years ago (yes I am refering to something else posted on this thread that I am sick of hearing as an excuse, cause "the west" has spent a ton of money on Haiti in the late 20th century and look what's still up there!) or it's CIA meddling or some such.

Hey did anyone ever inform Haiti that they are actually part of The West? Just sayin', maybe one solution is realizing that. And let go of the shit that happened more than 200 years ago might help. Constantly thinking of yourself as hapless dumb victims that don't no nothing bout living in the 21st century might help too?

do you really think I believe

artappraiser — Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:08:18 +0000

In reply to I think you are intelligent

do you really think I believe those missionaries are raping the children like she says?

Is there nowhere one can do this kind of analysis, even little Dagblog with 10 users, one has to censor what one shares because there might be stupid people reading it? The Madam already has 18K+ followers on Twitter. but my sharing on Dagblog the strum and drang she is trying to stir up is going to increase it?

Is discussing Infowars off the table too then? One must never ever talk about what he's up to? Unless it's explained in a pedantic manner like as if to a child? One cannot presume grownups are using this website?

I think you are intelligent

artappraiser — Sun, 17 Oct 2021 20:55:22 +0000

In reply to Madame Boukman also said in

I think you are intelligent enough to handle me posting shit that shows the type of inflammatory lies and arguments that are happening. NO? Your not smart enough to handle that info.? I have to explain why I find it interesting? What I said wasn't enough, that the missionaries obviously are controversial enough to attract the interest of like, Haiti's version of Infowars? That this incident is stirring a lot of shit and here's some examples I'm seeing?

You call it spreading disinfo, I call it trying to figure out what a mess of inflammatory emotional disinfo. Haiti is.

Madame Boukman also said in

NCD — Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:28:34 +0000

In reply to It seems that these

Madame Boukman also said (or reposted?) in 2020 that Japan sent "radioactive rice" to Haiti with evil motives.

The rice was sent in 2012 (note she was ranting about it in 2020) link. She also claimed in same tweet California rice is poisonous. Japan' response from 2012.

She's seems to be an Infowars like wackjob.

You might check into people you post. You are spreading unsupported defamatory lies from crackpots with unknown, delusional personal agendas. If you care, or can tell the difference, between reasonable and nuts.